Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The scam explained......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:27 PM
Original message
The scam explained......
Posted last night by kpete and in my opinion the best explanation that I have read.....



Today's banking crisis is the THIRD trillion dollar plus
US-caused financial meltdown in the last twenty years.

Each one of these crises came into being through the same basic
mechanism...the fraudulent over-valuing of financial assets by
Wall Street - with a "wink and a nod" (and sometimes a lot more)
from the White House and Congress.

The fraudulently valued assets stimulate the economy, impart
the illusion of health and then, inevitably, the fraud goes
too far and the whole house of card comes painfully crashing
back to earth.

The three trillion dollar plus frauds were:

Fraud #1: The so-called "Savings and Loan Crisis" of the late 80s

Fraud #2: The so-called "Tech Bubble" of the late 90s

Fraud #3: The so-called "Credit Crisis" of today

*** How the scam works

The mechanism of these frauds is simplicity itself...

...Take a shaky financial asset and blow up its value
and then sell as much of it as you can.

In the "Savings and Loan Crisis," the instrument was junk bonds.

In the "Tech Bubble" it was Internet stocks.

In the "Credit Crisis" it was individual mortgages collected
into pools and then re-sold to investors.

In each case, normal, well established "bread and butter"
financial principles were consciously thrown away by Wall Street
with no hint of protest from federal regulators.

***The "Savings and Loan Crisis" dissected

Junk bonds caused the Saving and Loan crisis which
resulted in the US taking over the assets of hundreds of
banks and selling them back over time to the marketplace
at fire sale prices.

Junk bonds, which caused the "Savings and Loan Crisis" were
shaky bonds that were pumped up by deliberate misrepresentation
and what I call "staged dealing."

Bonds get their value from two things: the amount of interest
they pay and how safe they are.

"Junk" bonds have to pay higher interest because they are less
safe. Therefore, until the "Savings and Loan Crisis," savings
and loan banks banks were not allowed by law to buy them and call
them assets.

Reagan/Bush changed all this and then a group of Wall Street
fraudsters used the new loophole to kick off an orgy of junk
bond creation and junk bond selling to banks and insurance
companies.

The crooks would deal the junk bonds back and forth
amongst themselves thereby establishing their "value"
and then they'd sell them to outsiders. The bonds
then became "assets" which could be borrowed against
and leveraged to buy even more bonds.

When the bonds failed, the banks failed and in stepped the
US government to "fix" the problem that it created at the cost
of at least one trillion dollars to US tax payers.

Deja vu, eh?

***The "Tech Bubble" dissected

The instrument of fraud in the "Tech Bubble" was Internet
stocks, start ups in particular.

A stock gets its value from the underlying company's sales,
its growth and its overall prospects for the future.

Pre-tech bubble, companies used to have to prove themselves
by being in existence for several years before they could
be sold on major exchanges. That standard was thrown away
during the tech bubble.

To pump of their values, the companies engaged in
"staged dealing" just like the junk bond crooks.

Company #1 would "sell" 20 million dollars in banner
ads to Company #2 which would in turn "sell" 20 million
in banner ads to Company #1.

In fact, nobody sold anybody anything. Company #2 ran
ads for Company #1 and billed it for them. Company #1
ran ads for Company #2 and billed for an equal amount.

These should have been called media trades not sales, but
Wall Street was happy to claim them as legitimate cash sales
and then use the sales numbers to fraudulently value these
companies - many of them totally worthless - in the
hundreds of millions and sometimes even the billions.

***The "Credit Crisis" dissected

By now, you see how the scheme works.

It's not complicated at all.

You take near worthless pieces of paper (junk bonds, stock
of start up Internet companies, etc.) and declare them to
be good as gold.

Then you create as many junk bonds and Internet start up
stocks as you get and sell them as fast as you can.

In the case of our current crisis, the instrument of fraud
was so-called sub-prime mortgages.

Previously, sub-prime mortgages had very little trading value.
Only people in the sub-prime industry itself dealt in them and for
good reason. They're tricky to value and packed with financial
peril.

But Wall Street changed all that.

Wall Street said: "If we take LOTS of these mortgages and assemble
them into large pools and then slice and dice the pools in various
ways, we can sell the slices to banks and other investors as AAA
paper."

It sounds crazy, doesn't it?

If the underlying pieces of paper are garbage, how does assembling
a whole bunch of garbage into one place make it "better?"

It doesn't, of course, and this is a principle even a three year
old child can understand.

But greed and the need to pump up a shaky economy for propaganda
purposes are two very strong motivators.

Banks created these mortgage pools, sold them to each other,
and they by virtue of these "staged sales" declared them valuable.

Do you recognize the pattern now?

If you do, then you are now smarter than all the assembled j@ck@sses
who do financial reporting because they apparently can't - or
won't.

This is the THIRD trillion-dollar plus fraud driven financial
meltdown in twenty years and apparently no one in the financial
news media can see how it happened.

***But there's more...

Junk bonds were mass manufactured as fast as the crooks could
invent them. Ditto for Internet stocks.

But how did hundreds of billions of dollars worth of "toxic"
mortgages suddenly come into being?

Why did the mortgage industry change its lending standards so
radically and so suddenly to make their creation possible?

And why did real estate lending regulators in all 50 states -
because real estate lending is a STATE-level issue not a federal
- go along with it?

Here's where it gets very interesting...

The fact is state-level lending regulators were VERY concerned
about what was going on. They have been for years.

And they not only expressed their concern clearly, they also
took SERIOUS concerted legal action to stop lenders from making
bad real estate loans to their citizens.

(Most of the sub-prime loans in the news so much today were
designed to screw the people who borrowed the money and can
rightly be called "predatory" loans.)

Guess who stopped the states from enforcing their own time-proven
real estate lending laws and thus created the raw material that
made the current "Credit Crisis" possible?

*** The trillion dollar plus question

If you're a US taxpayer, you're going to pay for this fraud
so you might as well know who did it to you.

His initials are GB.

You know him well.

But perhaps more interesting is the name of the person who
single-handedly rallied first state attorneys general and then
fellow governors to fight the creation of these loans and who
in the process became Public Enemy #1 to the Bush Administration...

His initials are ES.

If you follow "silly" US political scandals, you'll recognize
his name instantly when you hear it.

And you will *finally* understand why he was quickly and
permanently assassinated politically earlier this year.

Had ES been allowed to "live," he would have been in position to
remind everyone every day of who made the current meltdown
possible.

Instead, he was silenced very effectively. Not with a bullet
in the back of the head, but the net effect was just the same.

So effective was his assassination that no one can even
mention his name in connection with today's crisis without
risking ridicule, or worse.

Last note:

The crisis this fraud has created is *exponentially* bigger
than the S & L and Tech Bubble combined.

It's not going to be resolved by a quick "patch up" and will
likely have the same impact on the current generation that the
depression of the 1930s had on its parents, grandparents and
great grandparents.

On that cheerful note, here's the big story everyone missed
this year and now you'll finally know what REALLY happened
and why:


It's one of the most amazing displays of journalistic incompetence and malpractice in recent memory.

The US news media failed to draw the obvious connection between the bizarre federal law enforcement investigation and leak campaign about the private life of New York Governor Spitzer and Spitzer's all out attack on the Bush administration for its collusion with predatory lenders.

While the international credit system grinds to a halt because of a superabundance of bad mortgage loans made in the US, the news media failed to cover the details of Spitzer's public charges against the White House.

Yet when salacious details were leaked about alleged details of Spitzer's private life, they took that information and made it the front page news for days.

To the 9/11 fiasco, the Iraq War, the travesty of the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, and the shredding of the US Constitution, we can now add a deliberate and reckless undermining of the credit and banking system of the US to the list of Bush administration "accomplishments."

No external enemy, or group of external enemies, could have done as much harm to the nation as this group has in less than eight years.

Hey, do you think it's a coincidence that a Bush was involved the lasttime the US banking industry fell into a black whole because of White House-facilitated fraud?

There's actually a lot of money to be made blowing up banks.

Bush Jr. is not the first Bush to get "hands on" involved in shaping the lending industry to his will.

Many know that one of this brothers, Neil, was part of a spectacular Savings & Loan failure in the 1980s.

What far fewer people are aware of is how deeply the CIA, organized crime and, George Bush Sr. were involved in the Savings & Loan disaster which caused US taxpayers and estimated trillion dollars plus.

The term of art for these kinds of operations is a "bust out."

The scam works as follows: an organized crime group takes over a business, borrows as much as it can in the business' name, fails to pay vendors and then disappears with all the cash.

The Bush family and its associates in organized crime and the CIA have figured out how to run this scam on a multi-hundred billion dollar level using the entire US banking system as its playground.

When you consider that Reagan was probably out of it from Day One of his term and that Bill Clinton is a close associate of George Bush Sr., the Bush crime syndicate has been influencing when not outright running the executive branch continuously since 1980, which, perhaps not so coincidentally, marks the earliest days of the credit bubble the economy is now having serious trouble digesting.


"We are watching a poorly staged rendition of Wag the Dog , interpreted for the morbidly stupid and performed by the criminally insane." - Jules Carlysle

http://current.com/items/89322147_the_financial_meltdown_explained
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. So that's why Spitzer was brought down.
Retribution. We knew it, but it helps to know exactly why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank you for reading... I think it was a great article.
I am not saying that every implication is a hundred percent spot on... but it certainly gives a lot to think about!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are watching a poorly staged rendition of Wag the Dog , interpreted for the morbidly stupid and
performed by the criminally insane." - Jules Carlysle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Scary quote n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Only because it is SO true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. The New Investor Class
It's the only way the rich have to make money anymore. Production is irrelevant. They make money off of stock manipulation. Costs have little to do with anything anymore. If workers want their share, they have to fight the Investor Class to get it - not management.

Been saying that since I first got here. I think Michael Moore did too, in Stupid White Men.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly ... what do they do? What value do they add???
they are of $50 million dolloar use??? They ruin these 50+ year old companies in a few short years and ge paid $50+ million for doing it!!!

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. The person who wrote this is full of shit
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:23 PM by NNN0LHI
How much money did the Tech Bubble cost taxpayers?

Ø$

Thats how much.

To compare the two criminal enterprises that occurred during Republican administrations that cost the American taxpayers trillions of dollars that will effect each and evey one of us to the Tech Bubble that only hurt a few stupid greedy investors is being disingenuous at best.

There is no comparison.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think the tech bubble is another
example of market manipulation to pay a few by the many. Just because the tech bubble was not taken to the extreme that this bubble was taken to does not mean there is no comparison. It shows a pattern of false values and non-transperency in wall street that allows them to dictate prices and walk away with the cash when the bubble bursts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Two out of three isn't bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thats the thing I have discovered all stupid people have in common
They think everyone else is as stupid as they are.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes insulting people that are on our side but may believe some
things that we don't is smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Anyone attempting to insult our intelligence as the author did is not on our side
Nice try though.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Anyone who does not believe exactly like you do is insulting your intelligence?
Why are you so combative to discussion? Discussing different points of view and things that we have not previously considered which may allow us a more holistic perspective (if we have an open mind) could be helpful right now. Sometimes in discussions people say things that even they do not believe one hundred percent. Throwing these ideas around helps to expand and clarify.

I understand why you are angry but I do not understand why you are directing your anger where you are. You can disagree without being insulting and read things that you believe not to be well thought out with out assigning malice to the authors. I think we need to start dissecting what has been going on in a brainstorming manner and quit trying to look at things from the same perspective we have always had. And those of us who are happy to continue thinking the exact same way we always have could at least not be hateful to those who are trying to push the envelope and get somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Which raises the question you really are on.
This is the same tactics used in the Dungeon.
Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. The OP doesn't say the Tech bubble cost the taxpayers anything.
He points out that it was a Ponzi scheme, like the other two he mentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. agreed
people bet money on poor business models because everyone else was and the stocks were rising. And then one day, after the million dollar Super Bowl ads aired and the logos were designed and the foozball table was installed in the "conference room" somebody realized that these companies did everything but earn revenue; and wouldn't you know it, all the stocks crashed.

The taxpayers were not fleeced, just dumb or greedy investors. No crime was committed, at least no systemic "conspiracy" type of crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC