Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How long would it take to count 1,250,000,000,000 dollars?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:39 PM
Original message
How long would it take to count 1,250,000,000,000 dollars?
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 07:41 PM by louis c
one trillion, 250 billion dollars.

assuming it took one second to count a single one dollar bill, and assuming you did not stop to eat, drink, sleep, or conduct other bodily functions.

If, on those conditions, by my primitive calculations, in order to reach that number today, you would have had to start counting on the day Jesus Christ was born.

please double check my work to see if I'm correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate math. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Don't be hatin' on math. Math don't hate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. LOL
I have to hate on math. It kicked my ass in school. Especially trigonometry crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Trig! (?) ain't no thing.
Just triangles. Be happy you never had to figure out the tables for yourself!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honey, it's not how long it takes, it's who you trust to do the counting.
Ask the mob how they deal with large quantities of cash. It's a problem.

Hint: they employ oversight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Honey, Like being called honey.
I'm a 56 year old male, so I take that as a complement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Count it? Hell, you probably couldn't even spend it in that time!
Unless I'm calculating things wrong, as of Jan 1, 2008 there had been roughly 732,920 days since Jan 1 in the year zero (2008 x 365).

Doing a little math, if you spent 1.5 million dollars every single day since the year zero, you still wouldn't have spent $1,250,000,000,000. (732,920 days x $1,500,000 = $1,099,380,000,000).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Amazing, isn't it. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. If it were all in single dollar bills...
...I don't even know if you could burn it in a bonfire quickly enough to get rid of $1.25 trillion in 2008 years.

Er,...maybe Paulson could, but I'm pretty sure I couldn't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lots longer than that. Over 39,610 years. That's almost 20 times longer.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You used 365.25 and I used 365, n/t
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 07:53 PM by Junkdrawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Slacker, taking leap-day off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yup. I probably should have used 365.24, though.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Either way, we're talking the very beginning of the Upper Paleolithic period...
The Upper Paleolithic (or Upper Palaeolithic) is the third and last subdivision of the Paleolithic or Old Stone Age as it is understood in Europe, Africa and Asia. Very broadly it dates to between 40,000 and 10,000 years ago, roughly coinciding with the appearance of "high" culture (behavioral modernity) and before the advent of agriculture. The terms "Late Stone Age" and "Upper Paleolithic" refer to the same periods. For historical reasons "Late Stone Age" usually refers to the period in Africa, whereas "Upper Paleolithic" is generally used when referring to the period in Europe. In 19th century archaeology, the Upper Paleolithic was also known as the "Reindeer Age".

....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Paleolithic

The "Reindeer Age", or, for Palin, more than 5 times older than the Universe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. In other words, they'd have to start counting before 'counting' was invented
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. ... and those pictures of George Washington would've been VERY confusing.
:silly:

They'd SURELY think it was Barbara Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. I get 39637 years...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. If I'm off by that much that makes it 20 times worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Now imagine it's all in pennies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Now my head just spun all the way around. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. 1 year = 31,556,926 seconds
1.25e12/31556926 = 39,610.96558 years

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. 39,610 years! Unpossible, the Earth is only 6,000 years old! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I got the one year right
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 08:16 PM by louis c
Then I didn't multiply the millenniums correctly, I guess.

Political science and journalism was my deal in college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC