Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How people get trapped in bad mortgages.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:37 AM
Original message
How people get trapped in bad mortgages.
I realize the meme these days is "irresponsibility" - i.e., people who entered into unaffordable loans made their own bed and now they should have to lie in it.

That, however, is very much unfair. I personally feel more of the blame lies on predatory lenders, and in turn, deregulated lending practices.

No, I'm not defending myself - I have a 30-yr fixed at my own insistence because I'm 50 years old and know better. I remember the days of 13% interest. Most first home buyers probably do not.

Here's what happens: Renter dreams of owning home. Renter calls a popular mortgage lender and asks what it would take to get a loan. Mortgage lender gives a bucketload of options, all the way from fixed to ARM to interest-only. Renter is assured that every option is valid in certain circumstances, that property values will "always increase" and that you can "always refinance later."

So renter sets a goal and claws his way into a house with a mortgage. And mortgage insurance. And property taxes. And homeowner's assoc. fees. And credit card debt to buy furniture for the house. And more gas because of the long commute he now has to make. Yes, yes, he should have thought about all of that, but he wouldn't have incurred it in the first place if he'd not been lulled into believing that ARM was a good idea.

And so now, he's in debt to his eyeballs, the credit card companies have trashed his credit so that he couldn't get refinanced if he could, his house is upside down, his neighbors have already walked and his property value is declining by the day.

But we choose to bail out Bear Stearns, Freddie and Fannie, AIG et al and watch their CEOs walk off with millions. Yeah, THAT'S responsiblity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I remember when we moved 8 years ago...
The mortgage company was nearly irate with us because we didn't purchase a house worth the maximum they would lend us. And that we wanted a 30 year fixed rate.

They pushed hard for all the other options and told us we need to look for a more expensive house. We were strong and stood up against them and got what we wanted. What worked for us.

But many people are lured to the new homes, with all the glamor and manicured lawns and told no problem, we can just set you up with a interest only loan and set you out there in suburbia until we come and take it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They tried that with us, too.
We actually downsized into a different neighborhood. I think our first realtor was in cahoots with a mortgage lender (Countrywide) who was handling most of the RE in that redevelopment. We told him what we were looking for, the price range, etc., and he proceeded to show us houses $100k higher than that! "Look at the vaulted ceilings! Room for a chandelier! Huge yard! Mother-in-law cottage!"

"We don't want any of that."

"But think about resale!"

"We're going to die here"

"Think about your kids."

"We're gay and don't have any."

"uh . . . fine."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Modular homes cost $200,000 here
Not everybody is living in a glamor home and manicured lawn, even though they have $1800 mortgage payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. My clients' story.
Young couple ready to get married. Found a house on a lake. Home inspection report made the structure something between the "Money Pit" and "Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House". The asking price was waaaay to high for all the budgeting of repair and restoration to make it merely habitable. Think black mold everywhere for starters.

The Seller wouldn't budge on the price. My clients' own realtor begged them to break the contract and look at other houses and they refused. They had to get a mortgage plus a piggyback mortgage to pay for it and find money to fix the place.

I later found out why the Seller wouldn't lower the price. He paid initially a sum to buy the house, let it deteriorate, got a refi but for $160,000 more than he paid for it four years prior. My clients were subsidizing his windfall that the mortgage company inappropriately gave him.

Yes, they went on to buy the house, but have great financial pressure and argue about finances due to the house payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And then there's the divorce - like that would solve anything.
Throw in divorce into all this mess and you're only left with the bankruptcy option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Renter does not get "a bucketload of options"
Renter is given ARM and interest only variables, as they are told that's what they qualify for. They're asked a series of question that leads the mortgage "adviser" to recommend an ARM interest only loan. They would be fools to do it any other way.

People have no idea what's been going on in the mortgage industry. It's not like it was 20 years ago, not in any way. I was going through Wells Fargo, and they just kept juggling the monthly payment estimates when the terms of the loan changed for various reasons. No matter what the variables were, they just kept juggling the numbers so that good faith monthly payment stayed exactly the same. Crooks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC