Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TYT: Amnesty for Wall Street and Questioning Paulson's Motives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:02 PM
Original message
TYT: Amnesty for Wall Street and Questioning Paulson's Motives
Amnesty for Wall Street and Questioning Paulson's Motives
By Cenk Uygur

The government has made some stunning admissions over the last couple of days. First, the Bush administration admitted that they brought the world to the brink of global economic collapse. They said they desperately needed the help of Congress to authorize a $700 billion bailout. Otherwise their governance would lead to a complete financial disaster. Is anyone going to be held accountable for that?

Before they get any of the money, I would like George Bush to come out and say, "I'm sorry. Our governing philosophy was wrong and it led to this debacle." That might seem petty to some in light of the weighty issues at hand. But actually it isn't; it's very important. If we want to avoid this type of colossal blunder again, we need to know why it happened. If Bush (the government) is going to get the money, I need to know that he (they) understands what he (they) did wrong.

Secondly, the response to this situation has been as horrible as the Hurricane Katrina response. It's just that it's about finance, so not as many people easily understand it. Think about it. Bear Stearns melted down months ago. They saw this hurricane coming from a mile away - and now they introduce a panicked, three-page bill to give the Treasury Secretary almost complete power over $700 billion.

They didn't have time craft better legislation than that? Of course, they did. Either they wanted this kind of unchecked authority and pretended there was a sudden panic or there was a slow-motion Hurricane Katrina like response as they dawdled along with no plan until it got to be too late. I honestly think it's the latter. I'm now convinced they're not bright or competent enough to be that devious.

Let me re-emphasize that point. The $700 billion bailout is wrapped up in a three page bill! That is astounding. That means there are almost no checks on it and is incredibly vague. Any chance that some finance companies take advantage of that vagueness to unload all of their bad loans and contracts on us? Any chance that vagueness leads to lobbyists getting all that they want out of this while the American taxpayer gets screwed?

But we are told we must not question this bailout, because terrible danger lurks above us. It is imminent, we must act now. In fact, Bush said, "The risk of not acting would be far higher." I feel like I remember that from somewhere? Oh yeah, it sounds a lot like Iraq.

Who in their right mind would believe the Bush administration with no qualifications? Who takes their word for it? They tell us that they have secret evidence of an imminent global economic collapse. Really? You'll excuse me if I'd like to see that evidence.

It's not that I don't appreciate the seriousness of the situation. I understand that many financial companies were in a lot of trouble and I understand how that can affect the whole economy. But remember they told us earlier that if one of these giant financial companies went bankrupt, it would be the end of the world. Then Lehman went under and the world didn't end.

The stock market went down but it didn't come anywhere close to collapsing. Remember Nasdaq lost 75% of its value in the beginning of this decade, and we still survived. What I am not convinced about is that there is evidence of a worldwide financial collapse. And until about a week ago, apparently the Bush administration was not convinced of that, either. Until someone said the magic word - Goldman. The minute Goldman Sachs was put on the board of possible companies who might go down next, panic set in.

Now, let me do something that is forbidden in polite Washington circles - question the motives of Henry Paulson. For those of you who don't know, Hank Paulson was the CEO of Goldman Sachs before he became the Treasury Secretary...




PS---To watch Friday's Meet The Bloggers on the environment, sustainability, and Big Oil, . To watch previous episodes Free On Demand with guests including Rachel Maddow and Michael Moore,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R -- I liked this (always enjoy Cenk's viewpoint) Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. In Japan they have honor.
When someone screws up this bad, they take care of it themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. This should tell us volumes about the Paulson deal, I didn't know this
TYT's quote:

"For those of you who don't know, Hank Paulson was the CEO of Goldman Sachs before he became the Treasury Secretary..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree, that's a critical point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And there's more that people should know about his appointment.:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks for the link n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That is worse than I thought!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bump!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks. I'm happy to see that Rachel talked about this issue tonight n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. At this point, I am totally against a bail-out. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC