Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think EX-felons should be allowed to vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:45 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you think EX-felons should be allowed to vote?
The other poll, in my opinion, allowed people to hide an indefensible position behind a defensible one (although some were brazen enough to defend the indefensible). This one is more clear, and I'd like you to expound on your vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me copy my post from another thread.
Prohibition is admissible only if they are actually imprisoned. After they get out, even in probation, they become part of society again and therefore should be allowed to vote just like anybody else, no other red tape hoops to jump through either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. Agreed
They did the time for the crime, I've always been under the impression that all rights should be restored at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why should someone with a felony conviction be
barred from voting for life? A felony could have been simply shoplifting as little as $250 worth of merchandise or passing a bad check for $1.00.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There's this mental disease called punishism.
In which, when you see one of those "other," "inferior" people, you get off crushing that person's life in every way possible, and everybody who's appalled at your destructive psychosis is a "criminal lover."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. that is it
The real criminals, in some ways, are the ones out running around free and calling for the infliction of misery and suffering on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
68. good one! I was always looking for a word for this.
Why are these people not satisfied with the jail term as punishment? or the fines, or other penalties? They just want the punishment to go on forever, and with the person out of jail, where they are free to act on their resentments for being excluded. They had struck out against society once, and paid for it, so continuing to make them pay in these little irritating ways just makes it more likely they'll strike out again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
45. Because many of those people are members of the underclass, and they will tend to vote for
progressive candidates. I do believe that is one covert reason.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other. They should be able to vote inside jail
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 08:51 PM by question everything
why not? Why should not prisoners be allowed to vote while servicing their sentences?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's not "other," there's an option to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks, did not see it (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. In my opinion, even convicts should be allowed to vote.
Certainly would get rid of a lot of this "tough on crime" BS that politicians are so fond of that doesn't actually work.

It is not as though convicts cease to be American citizens, or that they are not afforded protections under the constitution. I think it is a strange thing indeed that taking away the right to vote should be a part of punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. The answer to this poll lies in what one thinks the purpose of prison is.
To me prison should be used as an opportunity to rehabilitate (I know that's a dirty word even here at DU for some) criminals in order to prepare them for productive lives when they get out. To this end we should be encouraging responsibility instead of just caging them like animals for however many months or years then shoving them back onto the streets. To this end, voting would be a small but effective way of preparing them for the future and the responsibilities that entails.

There's too much bloodlust in this country. Everyone wants to punish criminals just a little more than the last person who spoke. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Everyone wants to punish criminals just a little more than the last person who spoke."
Consider that stolen.

Oops! Theft is a crime!

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL! Consider it a gift.
I'd hate to see you lose your vote. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
55. Too late.
Them's the breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Depends on the crime!
If it's one of those victimless crimes, they should be allowed to vote in jail. if there was a victim to the crime, then after the sentence is fully served.

However, if they committed a "white collar crime" their rights to vote should be removed in perpetuity.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Define "white collar crime"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. When a white person who wears a suit at his job commits a crime. Just kidding.
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 09:10 PM by ColbertWatcher
When a corporate "titan" commits a crime, likely fraud.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Jesus FUCK, that's the kind of attitude I rant about all the time.
Basically, you want to punish persons X, Y, and Z in every way possible because you don't like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Have a look at the various statutes as to what constitutes a felony
or what might be considered "white collar crime."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Unless you can post one, I'd rather not, thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Of course you'd rather not
Duh.

You'd prefer to act like a child- rather than look things up and think about things like an adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. You know what, this isn't a conversation or an argument, this is stupid. I'm done. n/t
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 09:37 PM by ColbertWatcher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Exactly
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
53. White color crime deserves more punishment than murder?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. So strip someone of their citizenship rights for writing a bad
check (white collar crime) and let someone doing 10-15 years for forcible raping a child get their rights back when they get out? Is that what you are calling for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Voting is a RIGHT, not a PRIVILEGE!!!
Even for those wasting away in prison/jail...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's not quite that clear...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Where in the Constitution is it fuzzy? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. yes it is
The right to self government. That is foundational and all encompassing and superior to all of our law. It couldn't be more clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Considering the sorts of things that pass for felonies in many states
it's impressive that anyone at all would want to disenfranchise people based on a conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
56. See #45. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. If you've "paid your debt to society" you should be able to vote. It's INSANITY state govts. can...
prevent people from voting in a FEDERAL election!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hell, in some political parties, a felony rap sheet is a requirement for office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. If you think prisoners voting is 'indefensible' you're a fool
You can disagree with the clearly right answer.

You cannot, however, sensibly characterize the correct answer as 'indefensible' in the face of a series of defenses far superior to your own arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. You got it 100% WRONG. It's the OTHER extreme I find indefensible. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oak2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. Vermont has long allowed criminals serving their terms to vote
and we seem to be doing pretty good for ourselves, despite our dogged pursuit of this extremist agenda called "democracy".

The rest of the country might want to try it out, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malidictus Maximus Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. If they don't get to vote, why should they have to pay taxes?
"No taxation without representation" and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think everyone should have to take and pass a course in government before
they can vote, at least that way they would know a little something about how it works and maybe stop believing the faux talking heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. No. I'm kind of hardcore about this. Everybode votes, period.
Training wheels may be good for bicycles, not for democracy. If people are dumb, they should suffer the consequences of bad votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. But why should smart people suffer because of the dumb, especially after the
republicans all out dumbing down of America? Besides learning never hurt anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
32. Of course. the only crime for which one should lose citizenship rights is treason.
Otherwise, one is still a citizen and citizens have the right to vote. I can support restrictions against people actually in prison, on the grounds that they aren't residents of a community for which they'd be making decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Don Siegelman should not have been allowed to vote for himself while Rove imprisoned him.
That would've been a travesty of justice. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Even felons are still citizens
Every adult should be allowed to vote in a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
38. Here's a stumper: Should they be allowed to own guns?
Should a felon be allowed to own a gun after the sentence and probation is over?

Whatcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. depends on the crime, if it were violent or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Hmm. Should the right to vote also depend on whether the crime was violent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. That's stupid. A violent person doesn't endanger society by voting.
They DO endanger society by having a gun.

That said, maybe those ex-felons should keep the right to own a gun, but only for self-defense, and only at home, provided they live alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. So *partial* rights are OK with you?
Is that person still "a violent person" as you call him after he gets out of prison?

If they can't be trusted with all rights, why let them decide issues of war, crime and education?

Also, should they be allowed to hold public office?

Get a security clearance?

Join the army?

Become a cop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. So, if one right is abridged, ALL must be? Stupid II, the sequel. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
60. No, I think you should stop being stupid altogether.
Maybe murderers, civil rights abusers, tax cheats, Wall Street crooks and people who traffic guns into our cities shouldn't vote.

I think bad voting can be just as dangerous as letting them have government jobs or hunting licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. Not the same thing, would you let a violent person have a weapon which might
possibly be used against another person? I think if they paid the dues they should be able to vote, which has nothing to do with violent tendencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. Nope. I don't think they should have guns or votes.
Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. So should they be allowed a knife to cut their food?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. Yes, of course.
They should also be allowed to have driver's licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #38
67. To the same extent that other people can, yes
Once you've paid the price for the crime, you ought to have the same rights as others. Why have people out there, who, for life, are excluded from stuff? They are only resentful. And out of jail! The idiocy of this stuff amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Constitution is not the right place to look for..
the right to vote-- remember that the country stated out with only white male landowners voting. It took a long time for black men to get the vote, and even longer for women. And those were by specific amendments.

So, since it's not clearly spelled out in the Contitution that convicts have an inalienable right to vote, we have to approach it from another angle.

Are convicts citizens? Is the right to vote an inalienable right of citizens? While giving up some freedoms of movement, association, etc, at what point do we stop stripping convicts of basic human and political rights?

And while we're arguing that, what is accomplished by denying a convict the right to vote? Is it merely punitive, or is there some argument that allowing convicts to vote would somehow cause societal problems so bad that we must stop them from voting before civilization falls?

Me? I say they are still citizens and still have the basic rights of citizens even while incarcerated. Anyone wanting to deny them the vote must come up with some damn good arguments before we start taking away basic rights.

(Not that some people seem to enjoy taking away rights as long as they can get away with it...)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. They'll legalize crime!
If they get together to vote they will vote to have all crimes legalized!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
50. Bullshit. My poll couldn't have been clearer.
I specified that I was speaking of those currently incarcerated. Try being honest. And yeah, I support my state's allowing felons to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. Instead of "clear," I should've said "specific."
The thing is that allowing a convict to vote after the sentence is up, or even when in probation, two defensible positions, were lumped with denying the right to vote forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
51. Yes. They should be allowed to vote while in jail, too.
The only way you should be able to lose the right to vote is if you renounce your citizenship. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
54. I say give them the vote even in prison.
The real psychopaths aren't going to bother. There's nothing in it for them. The others would benefit from being given some rights & responsibilities. They need practice thinking beyond the narrow confines (no pun intended--don't hit me) of their self-interests, and as they start taking an interest in society, they ought to have the experience of having their opinions count. After all, how many of them do you imagine voted before they got locked up?

For most of you folks, the idea of a felon is an abstraction. Not for me. I have done psychological evaluations of a couple thousand of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
57. All BUT violent criminals should be able to vote in jail
Violent criminals - aggrevated rape, murder, etc. - should lose all rights in jail, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. Yes, unless their offense was related to public office or voting
If they betrayed their oath or tried to prevent a fair election, they should never again be allowed to hold any office of public trust, nor ever vote or be involved in elections in any way. Those kinds of offenses are a kind of generic, "white-label" treason and the people who commit them should be forever beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pterodactyl Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
61. Giving ex-felons the vote would cause a very big problem.
The problem is that both white color criminals and violent offenders don't respect other people. Which means they'd be more likely to vote Republican. That wouldn't be good.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
65. How the hell are we going to reform America's culture of imprisonment...
...if its victims are silenced?

The right to vote should never be taken away, or suspended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
66. Yes, they should not be out of jail, yet excluded from society
Why do we need people free roaming the streets who have no right to vote, and thus no stake in civil government and social institutions.

This is stupid shit that the vindictive don't even realize could blowback against them.

The punishment is the jail term. When that term is over, they've paid. Society has exacted its penalty and tries for more at its own peril. Have these people knowing they aren't included but free? What are they going to do? Strike back, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
69. Yes
As soon as they are no longer under supervision of the criminal justice system, they should have ALL civil rights restored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC