Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are Dems trying to avoid a midnight executive order on bailout?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kurt_cagle Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:21 PM
Original message
Are Dems trying to avoid a midnight executive order on bailout?
One thing that occurred to me, and that I'm not seeing on DU, is that few people have considered the possibility that Bush is just waiting out the clock, expecting Congress to go home in order to do last minute electioneering, at which point he will issue an executive order giving Paulson his "emergency finance plan" by fiat. The Dems recognize this, and are trying to set up a realistic alternative before they adjourn to avoid precisely this course of action. Bush has certainly not been shy to use executive orders before (after all, isn't that essentially what the bail out plans for Freddie and Fannie were?) and his contempt for congress has been manifest from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. can he actually do that? Congress controls appropriations....
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 01:23 PM by mike_c
That part of the Constitution is pretty unambiguous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Exactly. Not even BushCo is that stupid.
Talk about climbing out on a limb and then sawing it off, oy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let him do it. Then the blame goes on the Republicans.
Democrats need to realize that there are third party candidates out there who will oppose this suicide pact. Democrats need to pass credit card relief and foreclosure relief and let the fat cats eat their vomit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. well I guess some Americans are awake they are blaming the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarbirdForObama Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let him do JUST that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then, even the Rethugs will be calling for his head.

Has ANY President even had a 0% approval rating, or 100% disapproval?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebass1271 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. i have think of a different perspective on this bail out
crap.. how about if republicans are doing this to put Obama again on the fence and waiting for his VOTE to get him!!.. if he votes for it it will the american ppl that he is for the same lobbyists mccain is.. if he votes against it, he will be accused of not wanting to support the american ppl who are currently hurting..

This vote for Obama will not be a win win for him.. To me, this is all A TRAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. who votes first, mccain or obama?
are states called on alphabetically, or in the order they became states, or something else?

how does it work in the senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. There should be no vote. That takes care of it.
This should not be decided in the last two months before an election. It is too important.

The bill does not end the foreclosures, so it won't help ordinary Americans or relieve them. And the super-rich who invested in these infamous securities can wait. So what if they have to sell their Lamborghinis or put off buying a new set of golf clubs. They won't starve.

The entire point of this proposal is to tie the hands of the next president and to prevent change in D.C.

No. No. No. Write your Congresscritters right now and often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where does the president get that power?
The power to make recess appointments is in the Constitution. I'm not aware of any power to appropriate money during congressional recess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. from dick cheney's over-active imagination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurt_cagle Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ordinarily ...
a president does not have this kind of authority ... however, with Congress having given the nod to Paulson trying to help shore up Freddie and Fannie, etc., it looked to me like the assumption had been on Treasury's part that they already HAD a blank check to provide a bailout that differed only in magnitude, and it had been their intent to essentially push this through only as more of the same. BushCo had assumed that Congress would cave without argument, they didn't, and many (most) of the opposition came not from the Dems but from their own party.

The Paulson bailout plan is a flagrantly blank cheque, and nothing else - there is no substance, no real plan, it amounted to "give all of the authority to Hank Paulson and he'll fix the mess". It wasn't intended to stand scrutiny, it was there simply to be a prop to wave in front of Congress to get them to vote out of panic. Moreover, Reid had already announced earlier that Congress would be adjourning for the election season, and the intent of Bush was that they would react in their own self-interest, sign the bill without looking at it, and go home.

I think it was a major miscalculation on their part, and one I'd probably trace to Cheney. Now, the attention has shifted from the crisis to the bailout, and people are becoming angry about the deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC