Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland Security Detects Terrorist Threats by Reading Your Mind

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:00 PM
Original message
Homeland Security Detects Terrorist Threats by Reading Your Mind
:eyes:

Sorry for the Faux link, but it's where the story came from...

===

Homeland Security Detects Terrorist Threats by Reading Your Mind

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

By Allison Barrie


A computer screens displays input from Homeland Security's FAST body scanner during a demonstration.

A computer screens displays input from Homeland Security's FAST body scanner during a demonstration.

Baggage searches are SOOOOOO early-21st century. Homeland Security is now testing the next generation of security screening — a body scanner that can read your mind.

Most preventive screening looks for explosives or metals that pose a threat. But a new system called MALINTENT turns the old school approach on its head. This Orwellian-sounding machine detects the person — not the device — set to wreak havoc and terror.

MALINTENT, the brainchild of the cutting-edge Human Factors division in Homeland Security's directorate for Science and Technology, searches your body for non-verbal cues that predict whether you mean harm to your fellow passengers.

It has a series of sensors and imagers that read your body temperature, heart rate and respiration for unconscious tells invisible to the naked eye — signals terrorists and criminals may display in advance of an attack.

But this is no polygraph test. Subjects do not get hooked up or strapped down for a careful reading; those sensors do all the work without any actual physical contact. It's like an X-ray for bad intentions.

Currently, all the sensors and equipment are packaged inside a mobile screening laboratory about the size of a trailer or large truck bed, and just last week, Homeland Security put it to a field test in Maryland, scanning 144 mostly unwitting human subjects.

While I'd love to give you the full scoop on the unusual experiment, testing is ongoing and full disclosure would compromise future tests.

But what I can tell you is that the test subjects were average Joes living in the D.C. area who thought they were attending something like a technology expo; in order for the experiment to work effectively and to get the testing subjects to buy in, the cover story had to be convincing.

While the 144 test subjects thought they were merely passing through an entrance way, they actually passed through a series of sensors that screened them for bad intentions.

Homeland Security also selected a group of 23 attendees to be civilian "accomplices" in their test. They were each given a "disruptive device" to carry through the portal — and, unlike the other attendees, were conscious that they were on a mission.

In order to conduct these tests on human subjects, DHS had to meet rigorous safety standards to ensure the screening would not cause any physical or emotional harm.

So here's how it works. When the sensors identify that something is off, they transmit warning data to analysts, who decide whether to flag passengers for further questioning. The next step involves micro-facial scanning, which involves measuring minute muscle movements in the face for clues to mood and intention.

Homeland Security has developed a system to recognize, define and measure seven primary emotions and emotional cues that are reflected in contractions of facial muscles. MALINTENT identifies these emotions and relays the information back to a security screener almost in real-time.

This whole security array — the scanners and screeners who make up the mobile lab — is called "Future Attribute Screening Technology" — or FAST — because it is designed to get passengers through security in two to four minutes, and often faster.

If you're rushed or stressed, you may send out signals of anxiety, but FAST isn't fooled. It's already good enough to tell the difference between a harried traveler and a terrorist. Even if you sweat heavily by nature, FAST won't mistake you for a baddie.

"If you focus on looking at the person, you don't have to worry about detecting the device itself," said Bob Burns, MALINTENT's project leader. And while there are devices out there that look at individual cues, a comprehensive screening device like this has never before been put together.

While FAST's batting average is classified, Undersecretary for Science and Technology Adm. Jay Cohen declared the experiment a "home run."

As cold and inhuman as the electric eye may be, DHS says scanners are unbiased and nonjudgmental. "It does not predict who you are and make a judgment, it only provides an assessment in situations," said Burns. "It analyzes you against baseline stats when you walk in the door, it measures reactions and variations when you approach and go through the portal."

<snip>

Burns noted his team's goal is to "restore a sense of freedom." Once MALINTENT is rolled out in airports, it could give us a future where we can once again wander onto planes with super-sized cosmetics and all the bottles of water we can carry — and most importantly without that sense of foreboding that has haunted Americans since Sept. 11.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,426485,00.html




Yay! The thought police are here!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm in trouble-I ALWAYS have bad thoughts about the Gestapo
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 02:03 PM by hobbit709
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can it distinguish between bad intentions and being pissed off at bullshit 'security'?
I don't think so, same emotions, odors, etc.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can it distinguish between fear of flying and bad intentions?
To top it off they will have less that intelligent humans operating the machines, go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. "restore a sense of freedom."
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The freedom to be a slave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh yea..that'll work
Nobody has ill thoughts while getting shaken down by TSA goons. ever.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. OH PLEASE!
"As cold and inhuman as the electric eye may be, DHS says scanners are unbiased and nonjudgmental"

These devices are not sentient.

They were programmed by biased and judgemental people.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I expect it will be every bit as accurate as...
...the polygraph itself. Which means it's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Homeland Security conducting secret tests on unwilling subjects?
That's fucking great.

What tech expo? if it wasn't some spook convention and say a regular tech expo that people like me go to, I sure as fuck would be pissed off and thinking about a fat lawsuit.

I do not consent to being scanned by undisclosed devises. I do not approve of Homeland security heading down the path of secret experiments on unsuspecting citizens. This kind of crap didn't play out all too great with the CIA in the 50's did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. So they are going to arrest bush/Cheney? Great.
Well, you said they could read my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkat65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Does it do pap smears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wouldn't it be so much easier to read Dick Cheney's mail to Addington?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC