Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Congresswoman responds to my email (No Bailout)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GeoK Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:46 PM
Original message
My Congresswoman responds to my email (No Bailout)
Nancy Boyda is AWESOME! She is on it!

I have yet to receive any response from Pat Roberts or Sam Brownback (both Repugs)

Just thought I would share. :-)


Dear Mr. XXX,

The last several days have been truly unique in my time in office. I often say that democracy is a contact sport; it only works if the people keep in contact with their representatives. On most issues, the vast majority of contacts are organized call-in and write-in campaigns. This issue is different. Almost every call and e-mail is individual and spontaneous. I've heard from conservatives, moderates and liberals but, across the political spectrum, they're almost all opposed to Bush's bailout. I hear the same thing from my colleagues. The American people are making their voices heard, and they're making a difference.

I want you to know that I also oppose the bailout. I put out a press release explaining my position. Instead of communicating through the media, I wanted to send this to you directly.

BOYDA SAYS "NO!" TO
BUSH BAILOUT



"WE CAN'T PAY FOR EVERY BAD DECISION THAT ANYONE EVER MADE IN THIS COUNTRY"


WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congress is considering President Bush's proposal for a $700 billion bailout of the financial markets by the government. Congresswoman Nancy Boyda (Kansas Second District) issued the following statement on the proposal:

"It's obvious that the New York markets are in turmoil. President Bush has proposed a plan to fix that. I agree with him that government has a role in keeping markets running smoothly, but it appears that's about all we agree on.

"President Bush is asking Congress for sweeping new power with no judicial review, no effective oversight, and no real limit on the money that can be spent. He's trying to ram it through with little debate by sowing fear and anxiety. I don't like those tactics, and I don't like his proposal.

"If President Bush thinks that Wall Street really needs $700 billion in taxpayer dollars, then he should come before the American people to ask for it and tell them how he plans to pay for it. If he will not do that, I will work with my colleagues to develop a plan that achieves five basic goals:
o Minimizes expense and maximizes profit for the taxpayer
o Restoring the availability of credit to business and consumers
o Protecting our responsible community banks who avoided the mess
o Enacting regulations to prevent this from happening again
o Preventing those responsible for the mess from profiting in the rescue

"We can't pay for every bad decision that anyone ever made in this country. Our goals should be the best deal for the taxpayer that gets the markets running again. I think Bush's plan fails on both counts. It takes from the taxpayer for Wall Street's benefit, but it doesn't provide the capital the banks need to get this country moving again."

Things are moving quickly in Washington, and I'm sure that there will be more proposals to consider in the days to come. I hope you will continue to keep in touch with me, and I will continue to do the same for you.



Sincerely,

Nancy Boyda
Member of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. She has the right * is a coward he won't come on the boob tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I find her comments ambiguous.
Is she saying that she won't vote for a bailout at all?

Or that she will vote for the $700 billion bailout as long as there are strings attached?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent news, I hope the majority of Congress Critters adopt this stance.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent - I have emailed Congresswoman Boyda's email to my very own Congresscritter
I have called her and will continue to call her every morning until this is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC