Republicans Should Vote Against the Bailout
by Patrick Ruffini | September 21, 2008 at 9:25 PM
Republican incumbents in close races have the easiest vote of their lives coming up this week: No on the Bush-Pelosi Wall Street bailout.
God Himself couldn't have given rank-and-file Republicans a better opportunity to create political space between themselves and the Administration. That's why I want to see 40 Republican No votes in the Senate, and 150+ in the House. If a bailout is to pass, let it be with Democratic votes. Let this be the political establishment (Bush Republicans in the White House + Democrats in Congress)
saddling the taxpayers with hundreds of billions in debt (more than the Iraq War, conjured up in a single weekend, and enabled by Pelosi, btw), while principled Republicans say "No" and go to the country with a stinging indictment of the majority in Congress. But for this to be actionable, it has to be controversial. So this can't be a few lonely voices like Coburn and DeMint. It needs to be the bulk of the Republican conference. In an ideal world, McCain opposes this because of all the Democratic add-ons and shows up to vote Nay while Obama punts.
A bailout may be inevitable, but so to can be the political benefit for Congressional Republicans if played correctly.There's more and I included the link but Huffington Post also has the story so better to go there than to give this prick any hits.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/23/rising-conservative-star_n_128789.htmlhttp://thenextright.com/patrick-ruffini/republicans-should-vote-against-the-bailouthttp://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Conservative_Patrick_Ruffini_Riles_the_Right_Veto_Bailout/blog