Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Channel Changer (Rachel Maddow is The American Prospect's Cover Girl!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:04 PM
Original message
Channel Changer (Rachel Maddow is The American Prospect's Cover Girl!)


http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=channel_changer_08

"I think I have a fear in general about whether being a pundit is a worthwhile thing to be," Rachel Maddow tells me over dinner at a Latin restaurant in lower Manhattan. It's more than the ordinary self-deprecation of someone who just got her own cable commentary show. It's an insecurity essential to the on-air style that's powered the 35-year-old's rapid rise from a wacky morning radio show in western Massachusetts to the liberal radio network Air America and now to her own prime-time show on MSNBC.

Maddow is not a Tim Russert or a Chris Matthews--an ostensibly nonpartisan interviewer who badgers politicians and policy-makers about contradictions in their records. Nor is she a Rush Limbaugh or a Glenn Beck--an attack dog who deals in calculated anger, bluster, and outrage. She's no mild-mannered liberal like Alan Colmes or a veteran observer like Wolf Blitzer or David Gregory. Maddow has broken the broadcasting mold. She has succeeded as an avowed liberal on television precisely because she is not a liberal version of conservatives like Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck. Unlike so many progressive media figures who sought to replicate the on-air habits of the aggressive shock jocks of the right, she stumbled upon a workable style for the left. She is liberal without apology or embarrassment, bases her authority on a deep comprehension of policy rather than the culture warrior's claim to authenticity, and does it all with a light, even slightly mocking, touch. She proves that liberals can attract viewers on television when they actually act like, well, liberals.

Maddow's accidental path was paved by the success of Keith Olbermann's Countdown on MSNBC. Neither Olbermann's impressive ratings (second only to Bill O'Reilly's) nor his liberalism were foreseen by the network, which hired him in 2003 as a straight newscaster. Olbermann's audience, along with the declining popularity of Republican media outlets as the country soured on the Bush agenda, emboldened MSNBC to give Maddow her own hour of prime time, a coveted 9 P.M. slot immediately following Countdown. (The Rachel Maddow Show debuted Sept. 8.)

The announcement was interpreted by some as a turning of the tide, a sign that cable news networks were no longer a hostile environment to liberalism. But, for her part, Maddow never accepted the idea that cable executives harbor a conservative bias. As she put it, "It's sort of the first refuge of lefty scoundrels to say, 'I get the real picture, and the mainstream media would explode if they ever handled it.' But if you can make it interesting, the mainstream media is interested in it."

-SNIPPED-

When I visited her at Air America a month before her MSNBC show was announced, Maddow spent most of her working hours in the cramped and messy office that she shares with her radio show's executive producer. The office--the walls of which are adorned with a holographic picture of a unicorn and a shooting target--is where she holds the daily news meeting for her Air America show. At that day's meeting, Maddow did most of the talking--accepting, rejecting, or modifying ideas definitively and quickly. "It's a great advantage to me that I've almost always done a full radio-show prep period before I've done any prime-time or late-night," she says. (In this, she has something in common with right-wing radio hosts like Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck, who do both radio and TV.)

Maddow's immersion in facts rather than in opinions has helped shape her on-air persona. When Pat Buchanan, who joined Maddow on MSNBC's election-night panel throughout the presidential primary, claimed that the expansion of the health-care program S-CHIP would give money to already well-off families, Maddow quickly pointed out that 8 million children in the very income group he claimed could afford insurance don't have it. And in another segment, when conservative MSNBC host Joe Scarborough said John McCain had not backtracked on previous support for immigration reform, Maddow was ready with examples of how McCain had reversed himself on the issue during the primary campaign. "When you see how hard she works and how much of a pro she is, that's magic to producers. She just kills it," Wolff says. "And that preparation is seen in the ease with which she goes topic to topic and the seemingly encyclopedic knowledge of current events she displays in the conversation."

MUCH MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Key = "Maddow's immersion in facts rather than in opinions..."
Of course, she has a perspective, but it is a widely informed perspective; it relates to both sides of an issue and IS its own thing at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go Rachel... she is superb!! Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I *heart* Maddow!!! WOOT! WOOT! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have a woman-crush on Rachel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Me too Mabus! And I'm not even a Lesbian . . .
but if I was . . . :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I hear about man-crushes all the time
I thought it was time to stand up and proclaim that we women can have them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Yeah, we DO hear just a bit toooooo much about man-crushes!! Rachel IS enchanting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like the fact she continues to have Pat Buchanan on her show
Buchanan was her biggest opponent on the MSNBC panels where she always got the best of him. Buchanan continues appearing on her new show and she handles him like a smiling and serene cat playing with a mouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I love how she calls him "Uncle Pat".
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. The funniest part of this is that it was Pukecannon's
hellfire and brimstone speech about eeeevil homosekshals at the 92 Repuke KKKonvention that jump started Rachel's interest in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Precisely! A wonderful sleak brunett cat playing with a chubby winded blustering mouse.
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 05:20 PM by patrice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Rachel kitteh sez
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 06:42 PM by dgibby
Come herez Unca Pat, Iz gonna put big hurtz on youz! I can haz Patburger, now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Nice Kitty, Kitty! I hope you don't have to barf up that sour, wrinkley, old white dude now!!!
We stand ready with rubber gloves and clorox-spray if you do!!! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. You know what else I notice last night? The other hosts really like her!
I know whe's KO's prodegy, so I could see why he always was visably happy to toss the programming to her show, but I also saw that likability or friendship in Schuster last night. I think that says a lot obout her as a person. All these hosts are competative, and I swear I saw real animosity by Matthews when he would turn the show over to KO in the past, but the obvious friendship between all of them & Rachel tells me she is not only intelligent, and a very NICE person!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Even Andrea Mitchell seemed genuinely taken with her when she was on.
I thought that was so cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am so proud of her!!
:loveya: Rachel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I say this in every Rachel thread and here I go again...
My gawd, I love that woman!!!

:loveya:

:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hooray!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for posting. Great article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. I hope she's not the future of cable news.
I like Ms. Maddow, and i do value her opinion. It's just that though she is more about...or at least some part opinion. She's great in the pundit/opinion role. I'm sure she could do real journalistic news, but thats not the hand she's playing. I just wish we could get more toward the point where actual "news" was a no sided issue just facts.

As a personality i find her uplifting. She is smart as a whip, lovely, and well spoken. She has an infectious smile that while even delivering bad news makes me smile. I get a good feeling from watching her.

As a caveat this is how the news is trending ala Bill-O, Hannity, K.O., etc. All in all i think having K.O., and Ms. Maddow on our side > than Bill-O, and Hannity on their side. Our side has the smarter, and for sure better looking people. Hate to admit the other side has numbers(media shills)in their favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Did you read the article?
Bill-O, Hannity not in Rachel's league.

Maddow has broken the broadcasting mold. She has succeeded as an avowed liberal on television precisely because she is not a liberal version of conservatives like Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck


Rachel is not the mirror image of rw pundits.


But I heartily agree with you on this: "As a personality i find her uplifting. She is smart as a whip, lovely, and well spoken. She has an infectious smile that while even delivering bad news makes me smile. I get a good feeling from watching her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePowerofWill Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'll give a little on that, but not all of it.
I'll agree she is not like Bill-O, and the others in that she shows more class and intelligence. Her show still reflects a lot of opinion. She is tougher than those posers to. I can see why she was begging for any McCain rep to come on her show the other night. The big bad repukes so afraid of a woman lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. k&r for Rachel
And here's hoping the massive success of her and Keith prompts a realignment at the other cable news networks. The way I envision it is that conservatives have Fox, CNN returns to call it right down the middle and MSNBC rejigs it's lineup to cater to a liberal audience. That doesn't mean distorting facts like Faux does but, like The Independent newspaper here, talking about issues liberals care about and tackling them from a liberal POV. That way, like newspapers, everyone has an option for them.

There's plenty of liberal journalists out there with every style from outright opinion to hardcore reporting (Moyers would be my choice for that. He works for another network but if the money offer is good enough...). It would not be all that difficult to sign as many of them as possible, some hosting shows, others providing analysis or being talking heads. Reorganise the schedule a little and reap the profits from the 30%+ of the populace which isn't being served currently (minus Rachel and Keith's ten hours weekly).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. I've said this before too, but here goes.
When I listened to her radio show, I was amazed at how she could make hard news interesting without watering it down. I would find myself getting immersed in some arcane procedure on Capitol Hill, and where other hosts would have left me bored, I would be engrossed. I knew then if she ever got on the TV machine, she could hit it out of the park. She's actually done better than I would've imagined. Smooth, professional, compelling; like she's been on the air her whole life instead of two weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC