Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Serious question: Can one co-equal branch of government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:19 AM
Original message
Serious question: Can one co-equal branch of government
summon the other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. some branches are more co-equal than others
congress cannot even get the white house to honor subpoenas.


on the other hand, tradition has it, no matter who you are, if the president invites you to the white house, you accept.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. What does "can" mean here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well Bush summoned Congress
so does he have the authority? On the other hand Congress is still waiting for Rove and they do have the authority to summon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think the President has any power (other than the bully pulpit,) to "summon" Congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. who (other than the media) has said that anyone was summoned?
even chimpy simply said he's "invited" Obama, McCain and the leadership to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ummm, it's in the OP. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, he does.
Constitution, Article II Section 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information on the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.


It comes from the British tradition of the monarch calling Parliament. This is how FDR got his 100 days plan passed in 1933. The Congress back then didn't meet until much later in the year, so he called them into special session as one of his first acts on March 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. when did bush summon congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's what I'm hearing on the greedia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. like I said. Just because the media characterizes it as chimpy "summoning" Congressional leaders
doesn't mean that's what actually has occurred.

He's invited them. Obviously, from a political standpoint, there would be no sense in turning down the invite, so if that makes it a "summons" I guess its a summons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Co-equal branches of government"? No such thing. Please find where that phrase comes from.....
Please link to any founding document that defines or styles the three branches of the federal government as "co-equal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC