Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We just wanted to choose a really large number"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:14 PM
Original message
"We just wanted to choose a really large number"
:wtf:

Treasury Pulled the Number Out of Thin Air

You know the $700 billion price tag of the proposed bailout? Treasury pulled that number out of thin air.

As Forbes writes:

In fact, some of the most basic details, including the $700 billion figure Treasury would use to buy up bad debt, are fuzzy.

"It's not based on any particular data point," a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. "We just wanted to choose a really large number."

http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2008/09/treasury-says-700-billion-is-not-based.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. $700 billion is just the appetizer course
The bailout is actually unlimited.

Check out the fine print-- the last 5 words of Section 6:

'The Secretary's authority to purchase mortgage-related assets under this Act shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. unbelievable!!
But hey, why not? They have been looting the nation continuously since Bush took office, who is going to stop them? No one complained about the trillions lost that Rumsfeld announced on 9/10/01.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL Heres the spycam video from that treasury meeting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL!
Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. exactly
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Dr Evil even looks like Paulson :D n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Thin air" is being way too nice.
They pulled it out of their ass.

I'll have to remember that when I do my taxes next year. I won't give them any information at all and just leave the whole form blank except for putting in a "really large number" on the line for "amount you would like refunded to you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. We should all be very thankful.
They could have asked for a kajillion dollars instead. Then we'd be really fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. It has always been the policy of law makers and government officials
to choose the high end of whatever they were pushing at the time and after debate settle for something less and everyone would be happy. What has happened with the Bush* Administration is they followed that familiar pattern but no one ever debated it and just gave in to what was first requested. Republicans were euphoric over this turn of events. Bush* got everything they wanted time and time again plus. I am not sure if that will continue to be the case but Democrats are still scared of their shadow so who knows..1994 scared the holy shit out of Democrats and they are still not over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC