Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unless you live in a cabin in Montana and are self sufficient

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:14 PM
Original message
Unless you live in a cabin in Montana and are self sufficient
(and, by the way, on whose land is your cabin?) you should be worried about the "meltdown" and welcome the bailout, er, the rescue plan.

Even if you live by cash only - no checking account and, of course, no credit cards - the people who pay you in cash do use credit.

And if you live in that cabin, how do you access the Internet? From the public library? And from where, do you think, this library gets its funding?

Even if we do not use credit, our employers, our customers and suppliers, government all use credit. And this is what happened in the past few days: banks stopped making loans.

Early in the year we debated the merit of helping homeowners who should have never purchased their homes. No, we do not want to reward irresponsibility, but the reality was that blocks after blocks in the inner city - not just in the suburbs - being boarded is bad for the community. Only last weekend one such building exploded when thieves cut the copper gas pipes. And, of course, they are perfect place for drug and meth labs.

When banks fail, when they do not make loans it affects our employers and our jobs. It affects any pension or retirements funds that we have. This means that more of us will be dependent on welfare. If we don't have jobs, most of us cannot afford to purchase health insurance on our own so this is more of a burden on society. It affects insurance companies, too. They have had rough time this past year but if the stock market crashes, their ability to pay whatever they do pay will be eliminated.

Yes, we want health care for all supported by our tax money. Except, with no jobs and business failing, from where, do you think, will the funds to provide health care for all, good schools, not to mention safe drinking water, roads and bridges will come? Or that library that you, who do not use credit, use to post on DU that you "don't support the bailout?"

The reality is that we are all in it together. We write checks and use credit cards - to support Obama and DU, among others - and when banks do not loan money the whole economy stands still.

Yes, many here would love to see the collapse of the capitalistic system except that this is the ones that fits best with human nature of "looking out for number one." This is why our parents and grand parents and great great grandparents came here and why so many continue to do so. (Yes, I recognize that many ancestors did not come here on their own free will). Because they came from a class system where no matter how smart they were or hard they worked, they could have never moved "Upstairs." And, of course, we all know that lazy co-worker who gets away with doing the minimum and yet his job, his salary, his benefits are secure. Do we really want to have the whole country operating like that? The best we can do is regulate and modify the capitalistic system so that a few greedy individuals cannot break the system while they jump with their golden parachutes.

And this is what Obama and both Clintons have been saying: that, yes, we need to come with a rescue plan however we need to include homeowners who lost, or are in the process of losing their homes, that we, the taxpayers have to be treated like shareholders benefiting from future profits and that the CEOs should not continue with their obscene salaries and bonuses. See Hilalry's WSJ op-ed here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x387610

I suppose some here like to cut their noses to spite their faces. They would like to see the collapse of the economy and being thrown out in the streets. After all, many did so when they voted for Nader in 2000. But for most of us, who are capable of rational thinking, we should welcome this agreement.

And as for, as some posted here - "most Americans" are against it, are these the same who are enchanted with Palin, who think that Obama will raise their taxes and that he is Muslim? How many posts to we have here about "dumb" voters who are incapable of listening and reading and finding the truth? So, all of a sudden, they are the smart one?

The fact that the Republicans, including McCain, were against that plan should tell us something. After all, they are the ones who think that we should "sink or swim," that we should "pull ourselves by our bootstraps" - assuming, as Al Franken says, that we have boots. They are the ones who show no compassion for the sick, the poor, and the elderly, the ones who lost their jobs or their businesses. This must be their faults, they think. At least, this is what Republicans often say on message boards.

So let's accept the plan that is being passed, and let's claim it as our own, with pride. And thank our representatives.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I actually live in a makeshift shack on an island off the coast of Giblatar
We don't have internet or credit cards here so that is of little concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. How did you post this one? Using drum beats to the next
shack who does?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. No he sends smoke signals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. With binary encoding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hoosier_lefty Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. you have a shack on an island?
I live on a piece of driftwood It's my dream to one day own
a shack on an island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. And yet, thousands of economists all over the world say you're just wrong.
This is wrong, it will not help or prevent anything, just another corporate welfare program your grand-children will still not have paid off.

Thanks for playing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Yea, the same economists who have been saying different things
in the past five years, or so.

What we are dealing with are real people, not some abstract theories and I truest Obama and the Clintons, who have worked with people and businesses who support the plan, with their conditions of including homeowners, of rewarding tax payers as if we were the investors, and cutting down the obscene compensations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. No they aren't. And Kucinich isn't saying that either. They are saying conditions
need to be added and the plan needs to be thought through. That letter by economists did not say that there should be no rescue plan.

Even Kucinich is pro-plan -- and he adds the condition of equity.

Please stop misrepresenting the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Thank you for the details (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't forget we can vote out the ones "with no plan". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Give them all the money you can spare. I'll pass ....
You are obviously scared beyond belief that your life as you know it is coming to an end, and it is.

Read some of my posts and replies. We were always poor. Now we gotta act like it.

Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Talk to me, are you ready to live in a world where US Treasury Bonds are downgraded?
Are you ready to live with certain high inflation, or worse yet, hyperinflation? Do you think that you can live with a government with perhaps a tenth of it's current funding(and perhaps no funding)?

Yes, the scenario that we face if we don't bail out Wall St. is bad, Great Depression bad. However the scenario we face if we go through with the bailout is much, much worse. Having our bonds downgraded is, quite frankly, armageddon territory. If we take on this one-two trillion dollars in debt, that's exactly what's going to happen, our bonds will be downgraded, most likely within six months, and our government, our country will completely collapse.

We can live through a depression, we've lived through several already in our history. We cannot survive having our bonds downgraded, hyperinflation, or both.

It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree with you
This is a band aid it's not enough and it will only parlay the inevitable--in the mean time the *players* can get all their assets off of the sinking ship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. WOW, I been saying that for days, and nobody gets it. Good post.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I did a lengthy OP on this subject a couple of days ago.
<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4074948>

We're being sold a bill of goods with this bailout. It's main purpose is to rescue the Wall St. crowd and provide a way for Bush to skate out office clean and leave the collapse for whoever comes next to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Not only will it be Obama's mess to clean up, but there will be no money
for any of the programs he's proposed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Clear, concise, and to the point. Thank you. -nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Why do you conclude that going with the plan would result in
hyper inflation and down grading government bonds?

We did not rely so much on credit and cashless transactions during the Great Depression. The population was more sparse and many lived from the land.

Frankly, we have always been employees, as were our parents. I have no idea how to make a living otherwise. And, I suspect, this is true for million others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoRabbit Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. I'd like to hear an answer to...
and like you, have been an employee (for the most part) all my life. Matter of fact, I'm almost 40 and have worked for the same company for nearly 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. I addressed all of those questions in another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. This is what worries me. We have to sleep in the bed we have made one way or another.
But the bailout is equivalent to burning the bed while we are in it, in my mind. Scares the spit out of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. This same argument could've been made to bail out HOMEOWNERS a year or more ago...
"The reality is that we are all in it together. " :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yeah no kidding
I have to wonder how the people who have already LOST their houses and all their money are feeling knowing that others will be thrown a lifeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ted Kaczynski is laughing in his cell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Question Everything
but this eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
39. ...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. And I would ask you for support documentation that banks have 'stopped making loans'.
Go down the street and talk to the small business owners. Have the banks revoked their 90-day revolving accounts? Has anyone here been denied a loan in the last couple of months (house, car, bill consolidation, whatever) based solely on the fact that the lender wasn't loaning money? I'm still getting loan offers from credit card units of Wells Fargo, Citibank, Bank of America, Capitol One, and American Express on an almost daily basis.

Have you considered that adding another $700 billion on top of the already provided $900 billion will drive up inflation and drop the US dollar into the cellar? If you think buying foreign gasoline is high now, just wait until OPEC won't accept the dollar.

We're not saying something shouldn't be done. We're saying handing over $700 billion to the institutions that gambled with their 'money' via credit default swaps and over-inflating real estate values, isn't the proper solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. Yes, go down the street and say if you can get a mortgage on a house
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 01:30 AM by question everything
even with good credit. Thankfully, I am not in a market for a house however several reports indicate that credit is tight. The loan offers that you and I are getting from credit cards are offers to enrich the creditors. Processing fees, interest rates and a hope of late fees.

On edit, read here

Credit Enters a Lockdown

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3512552

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. Just did that. Bought a foreclosed on second house. I have a credit score near the top and
ain't planning on 'flipping' the house. Put down the standard 20% and had the mortgage within 10 days of application.

The article quoted in the linked thread also offers no verifiable proof. A residential developer is having a hard time getting a loan. Maybe the banks are actually looking around the area and sees 72 other housing developments, dropping home sales, and a dozen bankrupt real estate developers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. You make up "facts" as easily as Caribou Barbie. You make assumptions with out any
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 04:40 PM by Vincardog
supporting information and we are supposed to agree with your assumptions estimations?

You say "let's accept the plan that is being passed, and let's claim it as our own, with pride. And thank our representatives."

I say "LET'S not".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. This Cooperate welfare... er um .... Bailout
will not help anybody. It will only help those Welfare Kings keep there insanely huge severance packages and keep the rich rich. If they really wanted to help they would use that money to put Americans to work and allow people who are losing their homes to renegotiate their mortgages. They tied this in Japan and it failed, that is why the Japanese markets are still down even with the news of a the bailout. We tried this before in 1931 and it failed. This bailout will fail just as it has in the past but the only difference is that unlike the past we do not have a manufacturing base and nothing to export that will save us. Be prepared for things to get worst before it gets better, and we will be left holding a $700 billion tab. As Randi said yesterday or the day before we got raped and is now being forced to pay for the rape kit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. That is not logic. It's panic.
The vast majority of debts are sound. The vast majority of banks are sound. There are some businesses that went overboard betting on easy credit, and now, they have to walk the plank.

We have been through these business busts before and we will go through them again. This is no worse than the decline of the late 1980s.

There is far too much air in the values of everything in the US, whether stocks or real estate. Let the air out, and the economy will start to right itself. Then use federal funds to help that process. Saving bad companies that got themselves into trouble is a bad idea. They deserve to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. You forgot;
"And thank the great magnet we have the money to get us out of this"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. "The fact that the Republicans, including McCain, were against that plan should tell us something."
As far as I know, McCain has played his cards close to his vest and said nothing one way or the other. Do you have any source that says otherwise?

My take is that McCain will come out for the renegade Republican version of the bill, thereby gaining populist cred, and leaving Obama in the same room with Bush. We're being outplayed right now, and need to stick a stake into this bill's heart right now. WALK AWAY!

For God sakes, the Dems caved to public pressure on off-shore drilling. It would be supremely ironic if this is the thing they take a principled stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
28. From a report on NPR
Many economists have proposed alternatives and alterations to the administration's proposal, some of which have been taken up by lawmakers. Details of the plan are still being negotiated, but here are some of the key points of contention:

Equity stakes: Rather than simply buying up bad loans and letting taxpayers assume all the risk, why not take shares in the financial firms in exchange, so that taxpayers could also participate in any potential profits? Banking Committee Chairman Dodd has proposed "contingency shares" that would only be issued if losses are realized on the assets bought up from a firm. In Tuesday's hearing, Paulson rejected the idea of equity shares, saying it would make the bailout program "ineffective" — though he didn't offer details on why that would be the case.

Valuing assets: There are already buyers for these toxic assets out there — they just aren't willing to buy them at prices that financial institutions find palatable. (In some cases, selling at those prices would make firms insolvent.) Many critics argue that the fundamental problem is that the financial markets lack capital, so the only way the government's plan will work is if the Treasury overpays for the assets; otherwise, why not just let investors buy them up?

So, how to price these assets? Technically, assets are only worth what a buyer is willing to pay for them. If no one wants to buy mortgage-backed securities, then right now they are worthless — but that doesn't mean they will always be worthless. Paulson has suggested that one way to set prices would be through what's known as a reverse auction, the goal of which is to drive prices down, rather than up. But some economists note that reverse auctions work best when the assets being auctioned off are essentially identical. That's not the case with mortgage-backed securities: Some of them may have plenty of healthy, payment-producing mortgages in them, while others may be full of defaulted loans. If the government simply buys the securities with the lowest price, it may end up with $700 billion worth of the worst loans, critics say.

Executive-pay limits: Some lawmakers want any company that participates in the bailout to agree to slash the pay of its executives. After all, they say, those who created the mortgage mess shouldn't be allowed to profit from the bailout. But Paulson has resisted this idea. He argues that pay cuts would discourage firms from using the program and would force thousands of firms to review their executive compensation before participating, a time-consuming process.

(snip)

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94973368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
30. thanks for your post...I just asked a question about this...
thanks again....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
31. You're dead right.
It's not the wealthy who will suffer the most. They already have theirs and will at the very least, they'll get by. They may have less, but they'll have enough to ride it out in relative comfort.

It's the $27,000/year single mother who answers a Customer Service line or the kid putting himself through college working in the mailroom who will be left with nowhere to turn. It's AIG's policyholders and all the people whose 401k accounts will be wiped-out who will suddenly find themselves out in the cold through no fault of their own.

Oh, and it trickles down. The guy who owns the franchise that services the vending machines in one of Lehman's satellite offices loses one of his biggest contracts, maybe more as some or most of his other customers will no doubt have to close up shop, too, as well as the small business owner who sends crews to clean those offices overnight.

And as all those folks go under, the rest of our jobs come under more risk than they have ever been before. Ever. Suddenly it's people who purchased modest homes well within their means 10 years ago and have never missed a payment will be defaulting when their jobs evaporate and there are no others out there.

And those who do manage to keep their homes will be living on a shoestring. The guy who otherwise would have made a few hundred dollars laying new carpeting for your neighbor down the street or repairing the roof on a co-worker's home.......won't. The upholstery shop uptown will go down because people won't spend the money but will make do.

It won't be WalMart that goes under, it will be virtually every small business that's left because they can't get credit.

People hate large corporations, but they only see the few Fat Cats at the top and never think about the thousands upon thousands of rank-and-file "little guys" who depend on the existence of those companies for their very lives.

But hey, so many seem to be convinced that they personally won't be affected, then why worry about such minor details?

Until, of course, they can't feed their own children. But then it'll be too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irish Girl Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Willow Tree..
Stop for a moment and take a deep breath. I know you're scared. But either way, this has to happen. The current financial monetary system is unsustainable and nothing, as in nothing, is going to change that. A bailout package is not going to make this fundamental truth magically disappear.

The solutions?

The entire financial system has be overhauled. This debt-based fiat currency of the American dollar, created out of thin air, is destined for failure and needs to be replaced with a sound currency.

And Wall Street has gambled our retirements away. A bailout will not change that, period. I'm still baffled how Americans can be so clueless how their financial system works. I suggest doing some research (go to Google Video and search for "Money As Debt", it's an excellent animated presentation that anyone can grasp). If you can understand what is happening and why, it might make you feel less fearful.

Bottom line - with or without a bailout, the financial system will still be in ruin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
33. Why should I welcome something no one knows will work?
We're already in the hole for over $900 billion in bailouts. That hasn't worked, the Fed now wants $700 billion more.

They won't tell us how they came up with this figure; apparently they just picked a large amount, with the implication being they hope it's enough...but just in case it isn't they added wording to the draft bailout plan that ensures they can refill the bucket over and over again as long as they don't go over $700 billion at any one time.

So say the Dems knock it down to $150 billion, with more available on approval. That amount is clearly less than the Fed had in mind; OF COURSE they're going to come begging for more with virtual gun in hand, "We need $X billion more NOW or it's economic apocalypse!"

Or...the Dems capitulate to the entire $700 billion request, and it's not enough. (Who knows?) The Fed comes back and asks for more, same virtual gun in hand.

Is any of this sounding at all familiar?

Meanwhile banks keep failing, the lending market is still seized up, and the economy you and I have to live with is in a nosedive because inflation is rising with each new bailout.

And none of this addresses the potential unwinding of trillions of dollars in Default Credit Swaps and the effect of THAT on the financial situation.

Now maybe I'm missing something. If so, if someone could explain to me how another bailout will be the magic pill that stops the death spiral, I'd be happy to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Right, no one knows if it will work
but the alternatives are worse.

Already banks tighten their credits and loans with, apparently, few exceptions as someone posted up stream. As Paul Krugman said on Bill Maher last week - this may not be the answer but it will prevent a disaster.

I trust Obama and the Clintons and Dodd to understand how not acting will affect all of us, more the middle and lower classes than the wealthy ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. The problem is that only one plan is being shoved down our throats.
Congress is not calling for public hearings with expert witness, there is no public comment period,
there are no constituent meetings. NOTHING!

And there are much better plans out there.

As far as I am concerned this is TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC