Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look. The bailout and subsequent US bond ratings cut is the GOAL, I wish more understood.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:43 PM
Original message
Look. The bailout and subsequent US bond ratings cut is the GOAL, I wish more understood.....
this.

The "bailout" is a tool to make a huge payment towards our collective credit card. I keep saying this over and over, and I don't think I have done a good job explaining this.

This is why the politicians are ignoring the American people on this, they know it won't work, but they have to do it, or the credit card gets revoked.

People holding US treasuries stand to make out big time on a US ratings cut. BIG TIME. Who holds Treasuries and our debt? Japan is number one, followed by China, and then down the list to petrodollar nations like the Saudi's.

Now, I won't go into arbitrage and a bunch of heady gobbledygook, but suffice to say, anyone holding Treasuries today picks up a tidy profit, FROM US, for when the bailout is approved, the bond ratings will be cut. An unfortunate by-product is the dilution, or the devaluing of the US Dollar, and the passage of this plan guarantees a depression as much as no action guarantees a depression. We will be paying the current bondholders off with premium buybacks, and at the same time, INCREASING our borrowing, because of increased interest. They get a couple hundred billion in premium immediately, and we PAY for 3 times over by increased interest ON THE SAME DEBT. For the next 20-40 years. If new debt costs 18-20%, it is still cheaper to keep the cheap debt at 4% on the books, by paying off the cheap bondholder not to redeem. 12-13% is always cheaper than 18-20%.

When bond ratings are cut, the interest rate demanded by creditors increases, as the borrower is a riskier bet. The baseline shifts up, and those holding cheap debt, say 3.5% 20 year US Bonds, have the ability to command premiums for the older, cheaper debt. By all accounts, using the late 70's as an example, what would be the effect of 18% (conservatively) interest rates for this country be???
A deflationary depression, coupled with double digit inflation, $250 oil, and here is the kicker, business credit drys up anyway, as the cost of it skyrockets, making expansion almost impossible but for the largest multinational corporations.

What so many fail to realize is the accumulations of long term debt by foreign countries is different than short term "liquidity" in the sense that we can still borrow from the Europeans and others short term, albeit at higher interest rates. The money is there, it just costs more. Banks can't make money when their supply costs more, so they hesitate to lend "down". Ask yourself, when you get a mortgage today, the bank "buys" the money at 2%, the government rate, but then "sells" it to you at 6.5% in a mortgage. 4.5% gross profit, because they have a monopoly on the "window", or the source.

The FED is so polluted by crap, they MUST get the stuff off their books,as they are having serious credibility issues, past that, they have so much cash out there, they need new bonds issued to recapitalize. We all saw the Reuters article about $187 billion in lending a day. Guys, that's 1.0 Trillion a week, but it's FED money, not ours. They need to make it ours. NOW. That is the hurry, to clean up the FED, pay off the Asians (partially), recapitalize the banks (that make up the FED) and the best part is, our leaders seem more than happy to accept the argument, because THEY don't get but 50% of the picture, or they are in on it.

At the end of the day, this is austerity, plain and simple. The people here that say "you don't want a great depression" are correct, but they are stupidly advocating their own extremely shortsighted, "I watch CNBC for an hour and I am an expert" self interest, over the long term future of the country, and themselves. Beyond that, a straight deflationary depression is BETTER if you have retirement funds, providing you quit buying into the corporate BS of "don't lock in your losses". I love that one, designed by brokers, for brokers. Sell your fund and GET OUT. Take the penalty. Cash is king, and if you think you will be out of work for any length of time, you won't pay the taxes anyway, providing a few safeguards are in place.

We all lose, bailout or not, but the difference is, by not doing it, we have the ability to look at our grandchildren and not have them despise us for our greedy, selfish behavior that my generation, the Boomers, are becoming increasingly known for. Anyway, I hope I have demonstrated that there is much more to this than meets the eye, and the Goldilocks "OMG, write the check" crowd have been duped by 50% information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tazkcmo Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. ty n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. So what do I buy?
T-bills? Other currencies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Everbank is a great idea
For us, S. American investments have been doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. welcome to DU
your last paragraph touches on one thing that has been on my mind a lot lately. what i wrote in an earlier thread and expressed to my sister today is that i would rather go through the depression with my children than know that i left it to them to suffer through after i passed on. it just makes me sick that there appears to be not a thing i can do - gwbush has been an unmitigated catastrophe. i can't even say what i wish would happen to that man and his cohorts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not going to pretend that I understood this.
You might as well be speaking in Swahili as far as I am concerned. And that is the boat most people are in with regard to this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I think someone's got it backwards.
If rates go up, the existing bonds go down not up. I have heard some rumors of Asian's unloading T-bills and if there's a run the dollar could plunge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very interesting! Thank you for sharing it with us! K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gopbuster Donating Member (715 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I might be wrong but it sounds like a stretch to me to say
Edited on Sat Sep-27-08 09:25 PM by gopbuster
that this is their goal to roll up the debt to a higher interest rate in order for people holding the Treasuries to make a profit. It might be a necessary bi-product of what will need to happen in order to borrow the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. umm, most u.s. treasuries don't have a put feature. a ratings cut SCREWS bondholders.
they have do hold riskier debt WITHOUT the extra interest to compensate.
eventually, when the debt matures, the can roll it over and THEN demand more interest to compensate. but that is looking out sometimes 2, 3, 5, 10, or 30 years.

it is true that this will affect short rates quickly, as well as any new long-term issuance, but the EXISTING multi-year debt will remain at fixed levels. that's why they call 'em fixed income securities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Numerous arbitrage opportunities abound. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. a little learning is a dang'rous thing.
of course there are things one can do, but simply put, the day the rating is cut is the day bondholders lose a fortune. they do NOT want this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Selfish boomers? That is a revelation. The boomer generation is the only generation who has paid
into Social Security for their parents retirement, as well as more than 70% of their own retirement.
It is the only generation who has paid for two generations.

The boomer generation is the generation who were the first Peace Corp, who started the environmental movement, who gave birth to the modern women's movement and civil rights movement, and fought a thankless war in Vietnam.

We are by no means a selfish generation. We have been more of a selfless generation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. That's not true ... but agree...nothing wrong with any generation --
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 01:06 PM by defendandprotect
It is intended to be a "pay as you go system" ....
so anyone paying in after inception was paying for those already retired --
with credit for earnings towards their own retirement --

FIRST ... until about '76, SS/FICA payments were based on ratio of
2/3rds paid by EMPLOYER and 1/3rd by employee --
Changed then to 50%/50% ratio ...

SECOND, it was "pay as you go" ....
never intended to run surplus --
They corrupted the fund by collecting more than required and "borrowing"
from it --
When Bush I wanted nore pocket money, Greenspan had idea of increasing FICA
creating a severe burden on middle-class and poor --

If all funds were repaid, SS would be solvent into infinity --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, what does the average person need to do...
...to protect themselves from the coming financial Armageddon?

I can't imagine that anyone would have job security in this scenario.

I'd really like to discuss how we can protect ourselves and prepare now, for
a financial disaster. I have a 3-6 month stockpile of food, personal items
and paper goods. We could live here and survive, needing nothing, for at least
3 months.

I've also started hoarding cash, but we're not rich. I've got $2,000 under the mattress.
I'm taking out a few hundred daily and I plan on doing this until I get to $5,000.

What else should I be doing? Thanks for any suggestions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick for reading when I have a moment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. I read 'The Shock Doctrine'..... I get it
This is their wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You got it. This is disaster capitalism on steroids.
Anyone who supports the current plan is very foolish. imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Fortunatly I threw over 1/2 our liquid assets into Reals
a few months after Cheney started putting his $$$ into Euros.


We're doing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have nothing and will probably end up homeless.
I've only ever had government jobs and a MS in fisheries apparently won't go anywhere in a depression. If that happens I might as well just die.

But maybe I'll take some corporate fat cat out with me, since they are the ones who got us into this mess. We need some heads on pikes or something. Obviously these rich fuckers won't get the message otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. An MS in Fisheries is EXACTLY what will make it now!
Tilapia and other sources of protein will likely be in GREAT DEMAND. Brush up, YOU are a very important part of our new world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. An updated report from Weiss.....in PDF. Long, but good info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Yes...long read but worth it. Also the list of troubled banks is interesting..
Nice explanation, too, about what could happen with the bail out if we do it, or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. First, let's acknowledge the corrupt nature of capitalism ---
Capitalism is a ridiculous "King of the Hill System" ...

designed to move the nation's wealth/assets from the many to the few --

UNREGULATED capitalism is merely organized crime --


We also have to ask why a private bank is running the country -- !!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. eliminate the Fed for starters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm sure that will come up in debates!!! What a farce they are ...!!
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 01:11 PM by defendandprotect
Agree -- why aren't Americans asking why the FED is running the country!!???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC