Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: Summary of Draft Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:21 PM
Original message
Pelosi: Summary of Draft Proposal
http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/09/pelosi-summary-of-draft-proposal.html

Pelosi: Summary of Draft Proposal

by CalculatedRisk

From Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi -- Sept. 28, 2008

REINVEST, REIMBURSE, REFORM


IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL RESCUE LEGISLATION

Significant bipartisan work has built consensus around dramatic improvements to the original Bush-Paulson plan to stabilize American financial markets -- including cutting in half the Administration's initial request for $700 billion and requiring Congressional review for any future commitment of taxpayers' funds. If the government loses money, the financial industry will pay back the taxpayers.

3 Phases of a Financial Rescue with Strong Taxpayer Protections

# Reinvest in the troubled financial markets … to stabilize our economy and insulate Main Street from Wall Street

# Reimburse the taxpayer … through ownership of shares and appreciation in the value of purchased assets

# Reform business-as-usual on Wall Street … strong Congressional oversight and no golden parachutes

CRITICAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESCUE PLAN

Democrats have insisted from day one on substantial changes to make the Bush-Paulson plan acceptable -- protecting American taxpayers and Main Street -- and these elements will be included in the legislation

Protection for taxpayers, ensuring THEY share IN ANY profits

# Cuts the payment of $700 billion in half and conditions future payments on Congressional review

# Gives taxpayers an ownership stake and profit-making opportunities with participating companies

# Puts taxpayers first in line to recover assets if participating company fails

# Guarantees taxpayers are repaid in full -- if other protections have not actually produced a profit

# Allows the government to purchase troubled assets from pension plans, local governments, and small banks that serve low- and middle-income families

Limits on excessive compensation for CEOs and executives

New restrictions on CEO and executive compensation for participating companies:

# No multi-million dollar golden parachutes

# Limits CEO compensation that encourages unnecessary risk-taking

# Recovers bonuses paid based on promised gains that later turn out to be false or inaccurate

Strong independent oversight and transparency

Four separate independent oversight entities or processes to protect the taxpayer

# A strong oversight board appointed by bipartisan leaders of Congress

# A GAO presence at Treasury to oversee the program and conduct audits to ensure strong internal controls, and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse

# An independent Inspector General to monitor the Treasury Secretary's decisions
Transparency -- requiring posting of transactions online -- to help jumpstart private sector demand

# Meaningful judicial review of the Treasury Secretary's actions

Help to prevent home foreclosures crippling the American economy

# The government can use its power as the owner of mortgages and mortgage backed securities to facilitate loan modifications (such as, reduced principal or interest rate, lengthened time to pay back the mortgage) to help reduce the 2 million projected foreclosures in the next year

# Extends provision (passed earlier in this Congress) to stop tax liability on mortgage foreclosures

# Helps save small businesses that need credit by aiding small community banks hurt by the mortgage crisis—allowing these banks to deduct losses from investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stocks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is really different from another "summary" of the new plan
This is a much more palletable version than another one I saw, where the "oversight board" consisted only
of SEC chair, Fed Chair, etc. all Bush-appointed Repuke cabinet members, no congressional oversight, no
GAO oversight.

I hope this one's the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can they guarantee reimbursement
...with trillions in derivatives out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lets all cut the shit ...

Lets cut through all this shit. If this paper was worth something these companies wouldn't be asking for a bailout.

Both parties are in full bullshit mode right now. I'm REALLY pissed off at the Democrats at this point for being a bunch of spineless, kiss ass, bend over and take it weenies!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoUsername Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly.
If the paper is worth so much, I am MORE than willing to sell mine to my Congresspeeps. And if the bailout is such a great deal, they should be thrilled that I am offering them the opportunity to buy me out. Just think of all the money they can make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd add one HUGE caveat ...

Id add one huge caveat that they did not ... get rid of Paulson. As the former CEO of a company they are bailing out and holding half a billion in stock, there is an undeniable conflict of interest.

No one can seriously suggest that Paulson is fit to oversee this. We all know how "judicial reviews" go in this administration. They'll argue jurisdiction until the clock runs out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoUsername Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. The actual bill was posted in the Economy forum.
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 09:01 PM by NoUsername
Here's a link to the text of the bill:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/28/news/pdf/index.htm

Edited to correct link after a correction was made in the Economy forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC