Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Regarding Gonzales's ever more likely successor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:31 AM
Original message
Regarding Gonzales's ever more likely successor
1. Who would we want?
2. Who would we settle for?
3. Who are we afraid we'll really get?

'cause it's starting to look like it might happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I want Patrick Fitzgerald
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, but we'll probably get.....
Harriet Miers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Reading about Fitz, I get the impression he'd
rather be a prosecutor than an administrator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. I want Ralph Nader -n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. with this administration who we get next is rarely an improvement
Is Condi better than Powell? Is Samuel Alito better than Harriet Miers? Is Gonzales any better than Ashcroft was? No we'll get somebody just as bad or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Unfortunately I agree.
Chucklenuts would probably nominate that facist, John Yoo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. And congress dems will argue against him, ask 'tough' questions, then vote him in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. But do you see what they all have in common and want to please?
Georgie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. But THIS time they will have to be confirmed by a Dem Senate
And a Judiciary committee chaired by Pat Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Judge Judy?
Judge Reinhold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Would need to figure out who is the least treacherous, among B*sh's cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. Jeffrey Dahmer
no, wait. he's dead.

They'll keep looking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Heinrich Himmler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. In my dreams
Carol Lam - to make up for her treatment

In my nightmares - one of the 3 people they tried to get appointed to the Federal bench who were even too extreme for the last congress.

The real question is who I'd settle for. I just don't know enough to make an informed guess. I was naive enough to cheer Ashcroft's resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. John Cornyn may be a real possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ugh, NOOOOOOOOO!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. Whichever crony is next in line to be rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. When does Bob Ney get out of jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Whoever it is, you can bet this Congress won't rubber-stamp his/her ass into office.
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 12:35 PM by spanone
but....I'm an optomist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Whoever I want or would settle for is irrelevant
Bush would never appoint such a person anyway.

I'd rather just impeach Bush and Cheney now and let President Pelosi pick the next AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. My bet: Bill Barr
AG from 1991-93 under Bush I; only 57 years old. Currently General Counsel to Verizon. They'll try to persuade him to give up his big bucks salary (stock will go into a blind trust) to step in for the next 20 months or so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Nice call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Sounds like Barr might fit the bill nicely for these folks.
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/16/2007/1511

Partisanship at justice isn't new
March 15, 2007
snip

That fall, Edith Holiday, secretary to the Bush Cabinet, asked Attorney General William Barr whether he knew anything about such a referral. Although Barr knew nothing, he quickly sent an inquiry to the FBI. Weeks later, the president's counsel, C. Boyden Gray, posed a similar improper question to a top Resolution Trust Corp. official.

Those queries and hints from above created intense pressure on Banks to act on the Lewis referral despite his opinion, shared by the FBI, that her work was sloppy and biased. After Barr ordered him to act on the referral no later than two weeks before Election Day, he replied with a roar of conscience.

"I know that in investigations of this type," Banks wrote in a remarkable memo to his boss, "the first steps . . . will lead to media and public inquiries of matters that are subject to absolute privacy. Even media questions about such an investigation in today's modern political climate all too often publicly purport to 'legitimize what can't be proven' . . . .

"I must opine that after such a lapse of time, the insistence for urgency in this case appears to suggest an intentional or unintentional attempt to intervene into the political process of the upcoming presidential election . . . .

"For me personally to participate in an investigation that I know will or could easily lead to the above scenario . . . is inappropriate. I believe it amounts to prosecutorial misconduct and violates the most basic fundamental rule of Department of Justice policy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Recess appointment anybody?
That would be my guess. He would put up people that he knows are unacceptable, and then appoint somebody during the next congressional recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. FERRET FACE
Its going to be this guy...........brother ferret face........Jeb


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Joe Lieberman.
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 01:18 PM by Hubert Flottz
Edit...Kathrine Harris needs a job...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC