garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 08:55 PM
Original message |
Has Fitz responded to Waxman's request yet? n/t |
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I believe he said no to Waxman... |
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
poverlay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. He said that federal law prohibited him from sharing his knowledge and speculation. |
|
MSNBC says he(Waxman) was "rebuffed". I say it was just Fitz being Fitz. That professionalism doesn't always work in our favor...
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 09:09 PM
Response to Original message |
Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. If you do a search for Fitzgerald you should be able to find the letter he wrote Waxman |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 09:21 PM by kineta
while it's disappointing, the reasons he states in his letter make perfect sense. on edit, here you go: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=412589
|
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-16-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He also said waxman should read everything in the public record in the case, |
|
that there is information there, particularly about libby. (we don't know why the "particularly about libby".) probably a reference to libby was told to do it by cheney(?)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message |