Cattledog
(695 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 07:49 AM
Original message |
Stanford Prof. explains Polling on NPR |
|
Stated that 1000 is the minimum # you need to survey to get a 3% MOE. So todays Zogby 1 day poll number is way outside any reliable model. When you look at his 3 day average of 1200 O is up +5.
|
fishnfla
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Pollyanna, I know, but I've NEVER trusted polls |
|
Its human nature to say onething and do another...the only poll I trust is on Nov4th, the vote , not an exit poll
|
stoge18
(328 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message |
2. What's a Phd from Stanford know??? |
|
He / She is an elitist living in an ivory tower. Definitely not from the real America. :sarcasm:
|
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Statistics Lie and Liars Use Statistics |
|
First...a this "big news" was a one-day average...everyone else on this planet is using 3 day. And with 3 days til the polls close, even that 3-day will be rough to wipe out unless Gramps kicks ass today and tomorrow. And, remember, it's national numbers...the beauty pagent...meant for the talking heads to babble about and nothing more.
I get a strong feeling once this election is over, we'll see a massive revision of how polling is conducted. The 2004 model, as Gallup already admits is flawed and they're just guessing at what the real populace is. From a statistics perspective a 1500 person survey nationally (about a 2.5 MOE) is the standard for a poll...and smaller numbers proportional to what state they're sampling. The problem of upping that MOE to even 2% is that it would require doubling the sample...and I get a feeling these pollsters are hard-pressed to get 1,500 people who will talk to them.
Cheers...
|
fishnfla
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I "heard" that the Investors Business Daily poll was the most accurate |
|
of the last 2 elections, and is calling this one close. What makes theirs different?
|
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-01-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Depends On Who They're Polling |
|
They may limit it to their subscribers or a specific demo that reads their magazine. With a higher repugnican turn out in the past 2 elections, it would make sense that an organization that polled them would see their results verified, but this election has a far different dynamic.
The confusing thing is the way the Electoral College can make a close election look like a blow-out. Win the right states and you're golden.
These elections have become a big poll suck...it's the lifeblood of the 24/7 cables and the chattering class and a good statistician can dig into even the worst numbers and come up with something positive.
Cheers...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message |