Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Rejects Motion to Keep Bin Laden Driver Locked Up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:35 PM
Original message
Judge Rejects Motion to Keep Bin Laden Driver Locked Up
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/37304

Judge Rejects Motion to Keep Bin Laden Driver Locked Up
Submitted by Chip on Sat, 2008-11-01 19:22.


Judge Rejects Motion to Keep Bin Laden Driver Locked Up
by Jess Bravin | WSJ.com


A military judge rejected a Bush administration move to that could have kept Osama bin Laden's former driver locked up for an additional five years.

snip//

"The prosecution motion to reconsider, reassemble, reinstruct and re-announce a sentence is denied," he wrote.

"The administration's effort to vacate the Aug. 7 sentence and require the {jurors} to travel back to Guantanamo to resentence Mr. Hamdan never made sense to us and it apparently did not make much sense to the military judge either," said Harry Schneider, a civilian attorney for Mr. Hamdan.

Prosecutors, who were at Guantanamo Thursday for other cases, couldn't immediately be reached for comment.

Although Mr. Hamdan's punishment is slated to end by January, the government maintains it may continue to detain him indefinitely thereafter, on grounds that he remains an "enemy combatant" who could take up arms against U.S. forces. The administration has not disclosed its plans for Mr. Hamdan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news, isn't it? It was time for this man to go home long ago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I totally agree. It's a big FU to this admin, too. Well deserved. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. k&r'd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's over Bush
It's back to the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesb2004 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Did the guy actually do anything wrong?
Strange how in everything I've read about this guy there hasn't been one word accusing him of doing anything wrong. Bush just picked the guy at random to inprison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC