Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court arguments will focus on naughty words

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Supreme Court arguments will focus on naughty words
Supreme Court arguments will focus on naughty words
By Michael Doyle | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — Dirty words will captivate the Supreme Court while the rest of the world is watching election returns Tuesday.

In oral arguments that just might turn blue, the court will consider whether fleeting swear words on national television merit punishment. It's a closely watched case, and not just for the R-rated language and a cast of characters that includes Bono, Cher and lesser-tier celebrity Nicole Richie.

One side warns of dangerously loosened morals.

"The welfare of America, its families and its youth will be detrimentally affected by electronic mass communications which contain unrestrained indecency, whether in language or imagery," the National Religious Broadcasters warned in one legal brief.

The other side warns, with equal vehemence, of the creeping hand of censorship.

"Where free speech is at risk, regulatory agencies must act with caution," the American Civil Liberties Union declared in its brief.

Everyone agrees that Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations stands to be the most entertaining and influential First Amendment case in the Supreme Court's 2008-2009 term.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/244/story/55087.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Free the swear words!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, to be a fly on the wall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tweety's off his meds today. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like a job for the Rude Pundit
I can imagine the speech he'd make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. As Superman would say, "What irony!"
Yes I know that Fox Television and Fox News are seperate entities and about all they share is a name and parent companies.

But still Fox and the FCC in court is just too good!!

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidan Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. umm?
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 06:07 PM by Poseidan
National religious broadcasters? Maybe they haven't heard of the separation between church and state? You know, it's right next to free speech in the 1st amendment.

Unremarkably, religion continues using the same 'fear-of-hell' method to subjugate the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Holy s&#t, Batman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. The bigots object to non-euphemisms. Too damn bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC