HuffingtonPost has posted the Kristol-operated Center for Media and Public Affairs (If you need more info, check out this post by Underpants:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=109x35271)smear as the AP ran it, with no explanation where it came from and no attempt to point out the obvious flaws. If you have a few minutes, contact them to let them know they've fallen for it.
(
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/31/study-media-coverage-has_n_139916.html)
This is the e-mail I just sent them:
"The Center for Media and Public affairs is a Bill Kristol- run organization, with ties to the Project for a New American Century
and a vested interest in the McCain/Palin ticket.
If you want evidence of inherent bias in the article, take the following quote from the head of CMPA - ""For whatever reason,
the media are portraying Barack Obama as a better choice for president than John McCain," said Robert Lichter, a George
Mason University professor and head of the center. "If you watch the evening news, you'd think you should vote for Obama."
It is simply not sound analysis to suggest that because there are more negative stories, those negative stories are
unfairly negative.
If, for example, a certain brand of milk was shown to be contaminated with melamine, there's no reason to believe that coverage explaining
that contamination was "for whatever reason...portraying" the competitor's brand as a better choice. To suggest so without proof is
inherently harmful and, I would suggest, part of a concerted propagnda on the part of the right.
MediaMatters -
http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/200811010002Sourcewatch -
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Media_and_Public_AffairsSalon.com -
http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/conason/2002/12/18/bush/index.html"
(edited for a typo)