Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Dr. Maddow Show (New York Magazine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:23 AM
Original message
The Dr. Maddow Show (New York Magazine)
A FANTASTIC article about Rachel.

http://nymag.com/news/media/51822/



-snipped-

It’s hard to imagine many other cable news hosts going down that particular rabbit hole. (Can you picture Glenn Beck referring to the existentialists to make a point?) But then again, Rachel Maddow is not like other cable news hosts. A self-described butch lesbian with short hair and black-rimmed glasses, off-camera she resembles a young Ira Glass more than the helmet-headed anchoresses and Fox fembots who populate television news. Doing the press rounds when MSNBC first announced her show in August, she’d show up to interviews looking like, she says, “a 14-year-old boy” in puffy Samantha Ronson sneakers with iPod headphones dangling from her ears—but then she’d easily segue into an informed foreign- policy or economic discussion that ended with a Daily Show–worthy punch line. Her résumé is similarly unexpected: A Rhodes scholar and an Oxford Ph.D., she’s done stints as an AIDS activist, barista, landscaper, Air America host, and mascot in an inflatable calculator suit. She’s a civics geek who reads comic books, goes to monster-truck rallies, likes to fish, calls herself an “amateur mixologist” of classic cocktails, and even Twitters.

There’s something about the mix of personal details that is—to a young, educated, left-leaning, cosmopolitan audience—instantly recognizable. As one New York acolyte told me, “She is more like one of my friends than anyone else on television.” And her ratings have been astounding, especially in the coveted 25-to-54-year-old demographic. Maddow averaged a higher rating with that group than Larry King Live for thirteen of the first 25 nights she was on the air, enabling the network to out-rate CNN in that time slot for the first time. It’s an impressive feat, even given the fact that the show started two months before the election when political interest was at a fever pitch.

“You come out of the gate as fast as she came out, it gives me incredible excitement,” thunders MSNBC president Phil Griffin. “We are stronger than we’ve been in twelve years. We have more swagger today than we have ever had. It’s because of Rachel. And trust me. The other guys see it. They are watching. And they are scared.”

Over drinks after her show at one of her regular spots, the St. Regis’s red-velvety “old-man bar,” Maddow seems as surprised as anyone by her success. “It’s like winning an ego lottery,” she says. Scrubbed clean of the makeup she wears on television, her features are finer and more feminine, set with big, liquid brown eyes. She finds it hilarious that anyone could think she’s cool. “I’m such an old man! Maybe it’s geek chic, I don’t know.”

Since the show started in September, Maddow’s schedule has been brutal. Weekdays, she wakes up at eight in her West Village apartment—“the size of a van”—to work on the book she’s writing for Crown: an exploration of America’s relationship with war. “Writing makes me want to blow my head off,” she says. “I was very open with Crown about that. They assured me it wouldn’t happen.” At eleven, she heads to the Flatiron district to tape her Air America radio show from noon to one, then climbs into a waiting Town Car, where she uses the 25 minutes in traffic on the way to MSNBC to go over potential material with Vanessa Silverton-Peel, her Air America producer who also sits in on staff meetings at MSNBC. Usually, The Rachel Maddow Show’s 1 p.m. meeting has already begun by the time Maddow gets to 30 Rock and plops on the floor in front of executive producer Matt Saal’s desk.

LOTS MORE AT LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. rachel the former lesbian - based on what I see. she's pretty good on tv considering
i never heard of her on the radio aar which we dont have around my area.

Msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Former? Uh, I think she still is a lesbian. Ask Susan. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I don't know, I think she's got the hots for Pat Buchanan.
You could cut the sexual tension with a knife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. you can get full eps of Keith and rachel at itunes for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. LOL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. She doesn't have sexual hots for Pat, she does have "seeking Daddy's approval" vibes -
BIG TIME. She strikes me as a woman who became academically competitive to earn her father's attention and approval.

Just my opinion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. I doubt it.
I've heard her Dad on the radio. He seems quite normal and supportive. Not someone whose approval would be a fight.

I think it's more prosaic- she likes seeking alternate opinions and a challenge. Pat also has historic connections, to Nixon. She's a real history geek, I'd imagine that would enter into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. You can listen online
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Rachel
Edited on Mon Nov-03-08 10:29 AM by malaise
You earned your stripes sister. You're the brains of M$Greedia. :yourock:
sp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. One thing they touch on - but I think the cornerstone to her sucess is
That she is unafraid to be intelligent, intellectual - she never dumbs anything down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. She was bound to be a success
We are so hungry for anything resembling intelligence on the boob tube. And Rachel delivers in spades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. Not true.
It's a miracle. There are brilliant people out there who never get any recognition, while mediocrity reigns. I meet people in a variety of fields that are so far and away gifted, but other stuff enters into it. Cream rises sometimes, but more often fecal matter rises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. I can't think of another program that I actually look forward to watching except
Rachel's show. She's intelligent and civil, what more can we ask for? K&R Excellent article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. can't wait to read this
my GOD I love that woman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sorceress Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. I especially love this part....
"...We have more swagger today than we have ever had. It’s because of Rachel. And trust me. The other guys see it. They are watching. And they are scared.”

Damn right they are scared!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. that was a wonderful way to start the day! thanks!
What a treat that was--she's so nice, and there was lots of interesting stuff in that article about her background that I hadn't heard before.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. She is excellent. I first heard her on Air America back in 2004.
I did not realize that her Air America Show is taped. I guess that should have been apparent given the scheduling of her evening show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I think it is just since MSNBC show started. Actually, I'm surprised she is
still doing the radio show. I think it is her uncertainy that she would be a success on TV. She has kicked ASS though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Terrific article. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. She would make a great press secretary!!!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Telling comment from CNN:
"At one point, she filmed a pilot for a weekend political show with CNN. “She seemed really constrained there,” says a person involved in the program. “It was like they didn’t know what to do with her.” The pilot never went anywhere. CNN president Jon Klein says it was because having an “obviously liberal” host didn’t fit with the mission of the network: “It’s like, you wouldn’t put The Sopranos on Comedy Central.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-03-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. So, Mr. Klein just admitted that his cable news network, CNN, is right-biased...
Quelle surprise, non?! :grr: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. How about Glen Beck? Or Lou (I'm an Independent!) Dobbs?
Why are far right nutjobs legitimate, but moderate liberals too wacky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. Another Rachel fan here!
Thank you for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
25. I just find it hilarious they use Ira Glass as a reference.
That so fits the demo of the magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC