Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Moore is really a shameless self-promoter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:28 PM
Original message
Michael Moore is really a shameless self-promoter
He was on Bill Maher last week and determined that the only way to vote is the way it is done in Parliamentary countries - write a name on a piece of paper.

Which works fine when one votes for a party with its leader who would then form a government and be the prime minister. But as I was laboring on the long two-sided ballot that included candidates for President, Senator, House members (both Federal and local) city council, county offices, judges and several ballot measures.... how, exactly is he thinking we should vote with a piece of paper on all of them?

Of course, he does not. He just enjoys appearing as a guest on a TV program and to say whatever comes from his mouth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have truly learned the mystical secret of Michael Moore
Welcome to the plane of expanded consciousness. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Dude!!! hehe
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canetoad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know which parliamentary country he is talking about
It is not true that you write a name in. Hell, we are so civilized we have learned how to use check boxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. since he did not say that it seems...
do you have a point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL
He says things?! On television?!

The bastard!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. What he meant was that ALL ballots need to be paper, with a auditible trail, NOT electronic.
And I completely agree with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. No, he was echoing what was posted here about Canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Tsk tsk tsk.
What a jerk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. I suppose everyone will interpret
I suppose everyone will interpret what he "really meant" to better suit our opinions of him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. It's not suffiicient that it be "auditable" ... it must be "AUDITED."
While I'm in favor of optical scan, I absolutely insist that the ballots be sampled in an audit and that the sample is expanded up to a COMPLETE manual recount if the sample count doesn't match the electronic tally with 98% confidence.

In some jurisdictions, there's no provision for a manual recount let alone an audit. That's completely unacceptable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I vote on paper for everything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. How is marking a card for an optical scan machine any different
than writing on a piece of paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. It's not
there is still a paper trail. And as I understand Moore's stance, that is what he wants, not a digital wasteland where nothing can be replicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. Because...
the computer that tabulates the various optical scan data is where the election fraud was committed in 2004.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. IMO ballots in Presidential elections should have only President and Congress on it
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 12:32 PM by tridim
No amendments and ballot initiatives. It would certainly work then.

Moore is an American patriot and about as far from a shameless self-promoter as is possible. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. Then we'd waste more money and have even lower turnout on down-ballot races.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, Yeah, this IS the USA, land of Shameless Self-Promoters
It's the only way to get a word in edgewise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boozepusher Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That is the American way.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. We all know that Michael Moore is a shameless pencil and wood pulp tycoon.
Clearly he's just after money with his paper ballots scheme, the bastard..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's good because I like to watch him as a guest on TV
and listen to whatever come out of his mouth. It works out perfectly! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I would like to see two ballots in Nov. One would have only federal candidates. The other would be
for state, city, and county issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. I bet no one ever called you the sharpest knife in the drawer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caliman73 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. While I agree that he is definitely a self promoter
I also agree that he has the voting idea exactly right. He was not talking about emulating the procedures for parliamentary elections. He was talking about using paper and pencil which is tangible instead of electronic methods. He was saying that we should have one method of voting. He was saying that like almost every other western industrial nation, we should vote on a weekend or make election day a national holiday. Just because he can be a grandiose weenie, doesn't mean he can't make good points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. That last point I certainly agreed
to have election day a national holiday.

And the ballot has to be clear, even if it would take four pages, Remember the Florida butterfly ballot, when one was aiming at Gore but punching Buchanan?

I like the ideas mentioned here, to have separate ballots for federal offices and for local ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. This surprises you ...... why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. This bit of anamosity for MM is as ignorant as that expressed for Nader ....
Wake up someday ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Thank you...
I'm sitting here wondering what Moore did to piss people off (just watched "Sicko" with my teen daughters the other day - they were riveted the entire time) - did he say something negative about a Democrat? Did he say something positive about Nader or another third party candidate? That seems to be all it takes for some here. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. MM supported Nader in 2000 --
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 03:08 PM by defendandprotect
and paid a big price for that -- regrets it and still apologizing for it --

HOWEVER, Nader and those supporting him were scapegoated ...

Gore won by all counts -- including Florida --

More than 300,000 Democrats in Florida voted for Bush --

More than 3,000+ "butterfly" votes went to Buchanan ...

6,000+ votes went to Socislists/Libertarians, etc --

More than 600 "illegal" military ballots were counted for Bush --

We had a fascist GOP rally -- uninteferred with by Florida police -- which successfully
stopped the Miami-Dade recount demanded by the Florida State Supreme Court --

AND, of course, the fascist decision by the Gang of 5 on the Supreme Court for Bush --!!!


And yet these idiots conclude that a man who has fought for consumers --
from cars to elections -- and who has done more to keep Americans politically
informed and aware of corporate fascism in America should be be scapegoated for it.

WHY...? Because this is what the Dems told voters --
Dems who didn't do much but immediately concede --
and who refused to register official protest in USHR --






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Thanks dap, I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. I totally agree that Nader was scapegoated.
The 2000 election was STOLEN, plain and simple, by the very people Nader stands against. While I might not vote for him, I do have a great deal of respect for him and his decision (and right) to run.

I always have to wonder when people claiming to be progressives become venomous with regard to any third party candidate who DARES to throw their hat in the ring - or anyone who openly supports a third party candidate. It's backward behavior...it makes zero sense in a Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. Must be nice to believe in this
After it was all over the consortium of newspapers found that Bush had about 300 more votes than Gore. There were several threads on DU during the years.

Of course, there were the problems of people who were on the "do not vote" list, of long lines at machines at poor neighborhoods, and, I think, with overseas or absentee ballots.

But of the ballots cast and counted, Bush did win.

And, in several states, including Florida, the votes for Nader were more than the difference between Gore and Bush. I think Oregon and Wisconsin. Would these votes have gone to Gore? I have no idea. But Nader was a spoiler. And perhaps we should not complain since were it not for Perot in 1992 Bill Clinton may not have won.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. You're wrong -- Press reported Gore won no matter how the votes were counted --
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 10:35 PM by defendandprotect
Bush lost -- Including in Florida.

and of course the necessity of the intercession by the GOP Supremes and

the GOP fascist rally to stop the Miami-Dade recount

also strongly suggest that the figures were about to collapse to honesty --

we were down to a 34 vote difference WITHOUT ALL counties being recounted because

Gore did not ask for ALL --

And something like 128,00 votes in Florida were never counted at all.


I think you're also using some euphemisms for "GOP purges" and "GOP interference with/

intimidation of Dem voters" and "illegal military ballots" -- but your desire not to know

unpleasant facts doesn't change those facts.


Again, it works well for those who fear and want to suppress Nader when the non-thinkers

embrace the scapegoating myth --











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. We don't write a name in parliamentary countries - what's he thinking?
Election counts would dissolve into arguments over handwriting. Every other country I've lived in (4 european countries) people tick a box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. I watched Slacker Uprising, and I think he is great. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. Many people have said same thing -- how does that suggest "self-promotion"...???
Meanwhile, think you're describing yourself here ...

Of course, he does not. He just enjoys appearing as a guest on a TV program and to say whatever comes from his mouth.

We are voting for free-wheeling personalities rather than for candidates held to party platforms
and principles/ideals --

Think about it --



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. And, btw, what is Michael Moore "promoting" that you object to-- ??? National Health care-???
Edited on Tue Nov-04-08 02:34 PM by defendandprotect
Reading legislation before voting on it -- ??

Ending wars of aggression -- ??

Regulation of corporations/capitalism and consumer protections -- ???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wrong. Moore is a national hero. He's done more to wake this country up then most politicians
including Obama, Hillary and all the rest of em in Congress who refused to Impeach * & Co.

Posts like this reek of freeperville. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Thank you -- Nader is more of threat to GOP than Dems are .. !!!
:) :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Skooch over
I'll join the both of you. Got a spare helmet and raincoat? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. That's not what he said.
He said that we should use a paper ballot and a pencil. He never said anything about literally having to write every freakin' name in by hand.

But seriously, we're on the verge of a major victory and you're worried about Michael Moore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. It's right here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjhaxnvJlw4

About 6:20 in. In plain English - "They put a big X in the box..."

The OP is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Yep I am, because Moore's the freepers favorite target.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
40. When no one else could...
Michael Moore convinced me to vote for Obama. I came w/i three days of voting 3rd party, when I clicked on a Larry King interview w/MM.

Paraphrasing his words..."There are many Obama votes that I highly disagree w/(my reason for not voting for him), but after the last eight years, we MUST vote Obama in".

Michael Moore has done faaaarrr more good for our country. He has been relentless these past horrible eight years defending US!

But you want to grab onto something silly and smear his name. Shame, shane on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
43. He's Done More for this Country Than You EVER Will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. And, he's the only one in Hollywood who could be accused of being that way! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gonzo Gardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. You're dead fucking wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. That's the stupidest fucking thing you've ever said!
Today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-04-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
49. Damn the DLC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC