This is happening in my city and has my blood boiling! I'm trying to construct a response letter now... Any ideas or witty quips I should add in my response to this asshole?
http://www.progress-index.com/articles/2008/11/04/editorial/pi_progindex.20081104.a.pg4.pi00cahill_s1.2012259_edi.txtTattoo parlors don’t belong in neighborhoods
To the Editor:
Notwithstanding protestations of good behavior, the presence of a tattoo parlor at the entrance to Sherwood Hills is a blight on our neighborhood (Bad Ink, The Progress-Index, Oct. 10) and a failure on the part of the city administration and city council; one of the many failures for which I intend to hold the incumbents accountable on Election Day, but that’s another letter.
Ms. Childress, the owner of USA Tattoo, needs to know that I am watching this establishment, and intend to petition the police chief to close it as a public nuisance at the first sign of trouble. I have noted an increase in the number of taxis bringing soldiers in on the weekends. Although I am a retired soldier myself and have nothing but respect for the men and women in our Armed Forces, I am concerned about this kind of traffic so close to my home.
While I commend Bob Moore for his ingenuity in articulating a biblical argument against tattoo parlors, I doubt that argument will have much effect on our city council, given its willingness to accommodate businesses. The hedonistic and atheistic culture that we live in today is also working against him.
Jason Hanley’s argument that the biblical prohibition against tattooing refers to ancient funerary practices is a common dodge. The plain text of the passage refers to the dead only in the context of “making cuttings in flesh.” The ban on tattooing is not tied to the funerary practice and is, in fact, absolute. Our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, and, as such, should not be adorned with symbols, especially those of paganism or witchcraft.
His other argument, that tattoo parlors are already regulated by the state, is false as regards their location. While a proprietor needs to obtain a license from the Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation to operate a tattoo parlor, he/she can set up shop wherever the locality permits, which is why the city is at fault for the location of USA Tattoo. Some time ago, the city rezoned the first block of Sherwood Drive to allow for the establishment of doctor’s offices. One of the doctors moved out and USA Tattoo moved in, under the zoning then in effect. How a tattoo parlor equates to a doctor’s office is a mystery to me.
What the city needs is an amendment to the zoning ordinance that classifies businesses and only permits certain types of businesses to locate on the approaches to or in close proximity to residential neighborhoods. This should be addressed immediately, in preparation for the expansion of Fort Lee. The citizens and residents of the city should not sanction or be forced to accept the establishment nuisance businesses, including more tattoo parlors, more payday loan and check cashing businesses and independent car dealerships, close to their homes. The location of these businesses needs to be as closely controlled as adult bookstores. If the city needs to petition the General Assembly in this regard, it should do so forthwith.
Bob Haugh