Proposition 4 lost in California, which leads me to believe that the prop 8 wording

[still_one]

may have confused voters

i.e. Voting yes to take away rights, voting no to maintain rights

I also don't think that prop 8 will stand as Constitutional

[Maven]

1. No, the prop couldn't have been worded clearer

"Eliminate right of same-sex partners to marry..."

People knew what they were voting for.

[still_one]

2. To you and I it is clear, but people aren't always the brightest. Yes, to eliminate rights?

Anyway, it is just my take, or perhaps trying to give my state the benefit of the doubt, and like I said before I can't see this as being Constitutional anyway

[aquart]

4. I hope California watches it's new wedding industry dry up and die.

I am very bitter about prop 8 right now.

[Corkey Mineola]

3. No the wording was not confusing

It reflected EXACTLY what it proposed to do:
Take away a legally protected right for a portion of the citizenship.

[eowyn_of_rohan]

5. There's always the chance of evote manipulation -nt

[ColbertWatcher]

6. "I also don't think that prop 8 will stand as Constitutional" It won't. n/t