NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 12:24 PM
Original message |
I Should Like to See Howard Dean on the Supreme Court |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 12:24 PM by Crisco
He looks good in black.
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. he doesn't have a law degree |
|
I am not sure why that should matter, except it means that legal issues are decided by legalese instead of by logic.
After the Civil War, William Tecumsah Sherman asked the head of the bar in Kansas what he needed to do to pass the bar and he was told "nothing, that I will admit you on the grounds of general intelligence". Thus, he became a lawyer. Somewhat similarly, my grandmother graduated from High School in 1912, took a state test, passed it, and became a teacher for grades 1-12.
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
There are gazillions of clerks to look up case files. What's needed are clear logical skills and foresight. IIRC there have been some notable SCOTUS justices, maybe even a chief justice, without law degrees.
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
but I bet there hasn't been one in the last 50 years. You know the right wing would be squawking 'unqualified, unqualified' if we tried, and we'd do the same thing to them. In fact, I tried to hit Roberts for his lack of judicial experience.
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
The first SC justice with a "modern" law degree was about 100 years ago.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I think his talents should be utilized in the job he has now. |
|
...at least for the next three federal election cycles.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |