NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:12 PM
Original message |
|
it's been long enough now hasn't it?
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He left the military in 2000, the waiting period is 10 years.
|
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. drat! how about Homeland Security then? n/t |
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. No restrictions there... though I'm kind of hoping Obama keelhauls that dept. |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 01:20 PM by TheWraith
At the very least it needs a massive overhaul and a name change.
Though of course, Clark's qualifications aren't really focused on domestic security stuff. He'd be better off involved in foreign policy. National Security Advisor, maybe?
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. I'd like to see Richard Clarke have a shot at that. |
|
He tried in vain to get BushCo to take terrorism seriously before 9/11, but was shut out.
And, he was the only one to have the sack to publicly apologize to the families of the victims afterward, even though he was doing everything within his power to prevent it.
Intelligence, experience, determination, and accountability would make a nice change at the top at Homeland Security.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. That rule has been waived before and can be again |
|
That's the beauty of setting precedents. :)
|
Idealism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He is an American hero and has served his entire life for us, and he has been glossed over too long in the Democratic party
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't think he'll go that way |
|
I'd love to see it but I just don't think so for some reason. He better not stay with Gates, that's all I know.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. see post 5 above, I forgot about the 10 year rule |
|
That would explain why there hasn't been any "buzz" about him as a choice.
|
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Whoever it is, it must be a Democrat.
Putting a Republican in that position would be disasterous; it would send the message Democrats really cannot be relied on in military matters.
|
leftofcool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Was once a repuke years ago
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. I believe Magistrate knows that |
|
which explains the "hear hear"
I think that was I'm response to the notion of tapping Hagel or keeping Gates.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
..... he was **never** a Republican. That is an urban myth. Not to be mean or snarky, but please read this. It will take perhaps a minute or minute and a half; http://www.factcheck.org/was_wesley_clark_a_republican.html
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Since we can't have him as president, this isn't bad ....... |
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
15. where has he been? I haven't seen him since |
|
he challenged McShame's POW = President meme.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |