Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RW hate is worried about Fairness...check out this email in my spam folder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:32 PM
Original message
RW hate is worried about Fairness...check out this email in my spam folder
The Battle for Talk Radio:
Powerful Foes Want to End the Gabfest

The 2008 election has been decided and one thing is clear: the enemies of talk radio are firmly in control of the White House and Congress. Sen. Chuck Schumer and his fellow Democrats are promising an all-out attack on talk radio.

With a new "Fairness Doctrine" backed by an Obama White House, political talk, as we know it, will end.

If these forces of darkness win, Rush, Imus, Hannity, Savage, Beck, and dozens of other major hosts will be muzzled by using federal regulations to control political talk.

So, what's their plan of attack?

As Newsmax magazine reveals in its just-released special report, "The Battle for Talk Radio," leading liberals in Congress, the Democratic presidential candidates, and even some Republicans speak openly of their plans to end conservative talk radio using federal regulations.

Their weapon: a revived Fairness Doctrine, which would once again require stations to air divergent points of view — a clever ruse that makes station owners leery of airing controversial talk-radio hosts fearing law suits and federal sanctions.

With a new Fairness Doctrine, you could see many top conservative radio hosts canned.

This Newsmax special report also features an exclusive interview with Fox News host Bill O'Reilly who tells Newsmax there is no question a plan is being hatched. "The far-left kooks will try, but they will fail," O'Reilly says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rwanda had a genocide because of hate radio like Savage etc.
That law sounds good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ME TOO
I would LOVE for rush/hannity/oliely/beck et all to be GONE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. So let me see if I understand this...they're afraid of fairness? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. yea imagine the horror
of fairness


Boortz was crying about this today as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. If only it were true.
I don't believe for a second that any Congress with Reid and Pelosi at it's head would ever reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine. They should, though. These are the *public* airwaves-- these clowns are only renting them with the consent of the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. They need to take some tranquilizers.
I don't think any of the major liberal talk show hosts are in favor of the "fairness doctrine".
Liberal talk shows do very well in markets where they go head-to-head against the likes of Rush, Imus, Hannity, Savage, Beck and "Oh, Really". I sure wouldn't want to have KPOJ wasting air time on the likes of Rush, Imus, Hannity, Savage, Beck, and "Oh, Really"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. listening ot another opinion = censorship
Is their perspective so weak that allowing a different view will shatter it?

I grew up under the fairness doctrine.

Believe me, there were PLENTY of wingnut commentators back then (RIP George Putnam)

The difference was the radio or TV station had to allocate a small amount of time to an opposing viewpoint.

WHy are they so afraid of an opposing viewpoint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC