Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Not Sixty Seats? It can be possible...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 01:55 PM
Original message
Why Not Sixty Seats? It can be possible...
We are at 57 seats.

MN - Essentially tied (razor thin for Coleman) - recount to proceed...this one is probably a coin flip unless some minor funny stuff went on that will be countered in the recount

AK - If Stevens does hold, he will need to leave - probably longest shot, though lots of ballots yet to count (if Stevens goes, I assume a Repub will replace him)

GA - Chambliss under 50, so will be rerun - depending upon the resources that can go into this (creative ads?), Martin could always win the rematch.

So, so close!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. The more seats the better, but I don't think 60 is necessary..
The repubs aren't going to filibuster even if we have only 56 or 57 seats, it would be political suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed. Just thinking of piling on...and a nice round number!
Plus getting rid of Chambliss, Stevens (who will be gotten rid of anyway), and Coleman would be so sweet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree, too.
It's every man/woman for themselves now in today's GOP. There will be a fight for the soul of this dead pachyderm. There's 2 or 3 major factions that want to claim ownership of the franchise, but that could take a year or 2 to shake out. In the meantime, those Senators who are up for re-election in 2010 are going to think long and hard if they want to join any obstructionist effort by Senate Republicans. I'd hate to have Barack Obama using his bully pulpit to put the spotlight on my vote as a reason change is being thwarted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. We won't get GA...
With Obama elected and the Senate races close, Chambliss will be able to play the "divided Government" argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Please don't give up on Martin yet. Chambliss is a total piece of shit.
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 02:17 PM by Ilsa
I donated through Vote Vets today to help Martin. I think we can do it if we all pull together for him.

Here's a link for anyone not totally tapped out:

http://ga3.org/ct/x1XrGR61X4y0/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd love to see a grand bargin made with one or two of the remaining Republican moderates.
Olympia Snowe comes to mind. Maine's a solid blue state and she owes the Republican Party nothing. They stiffed her on the VP choice, in favor of a unprepared woman who is the darling of the Religious Right. Offer her a hi-profile cabinet post and maybe some desperately needed economic stimulus in Maine. Baldacci would then be free to replace her with Tom Allen. This could also work with Sue Collins, Arlon Spector, or Chuck Grassley. If there's a problem with Governor's choosing someone from the opposing Party, maybe they'd need to declare affiliation 1st.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Chasing a mirage .... not worth the extortion by shits like Lieberman and Nelson.
Those warts on the ass of progress aren't worth the effort. The Democratic caucus would need 65-66 seats to make "filibuster-proof" anything close to a rational goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is what I have been saying
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC