Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proposition 8 - Liberals Screwed Up - They Were Out Organized

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:48 PM
Original message
Proposition 8 - Liberals Screwed Up - They Were Out Organized
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 07:48 PM by Median Democrat
I voted No on Proposition 8. However, even though polls showed a slight lead by the No On 8 crowd, I was worried before the election. Why?

I saw excellent grass roots efforts by the Yes on 8 crowd, particularly in the suburbs. In the weeks leading to the election, the Yes on 8 crowd actively demonstated, picketed and displayed signs in support of Proposition 8. In other words, the Proposition 8 folks had a great ground game. I know that No on 8 folks were active in the city areas, but that was largely preaching to the choir.

I did not see many No on 8 folks on the ground in the suburbs. I only saw the No on 8 commericials long after the Yes on 8 folks had been running the infamous Gavin Newsome ads.

So, while the GBLT is going to try to litigate their way to victory, I am not optimistic. Courts generally do not take the lead on issues of social change, rather they tend to preserve the status quo. Worse, when they do, there is often a backlash.

I would have liked to have seen more of a ground game by the GBLT crowd in areas where there was not a prominent GBLT community. Education should precede litigation, and there should have been more of an effort to address the fears and prejudices of the general public, and educate them as to why civil unions were not a sufficient substitute for marriage.

This is my critique as a third party observer who voted No on 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did the "Yes on 8" side target the black community in particular?
I'm wondering about this because the CNN exit polling showed AA women voted "Yes on 8" by almost 3 to 1. That was likely the margin of victory right there.

I wonder if it would've helped, for example, to have Queen Latifah in "no on 8" ads?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Suburbs I'm Referring To Were Quite White, Hispanic and Asian
Not many African Americans in my neck of the woods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Sorry for any confusion. I was talking about whether it looked like that more overall.
Of course, it was probably the only thing that got Sarah's cult to the polls in your state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I think that was done by the churches n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. All those tax-exempt churches and their weekly captive audiences.
If only we could have liberal tax-exempt organizations on such a large scale to counter them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We do, but they are not that extensive, they are your reform temples
your UUA churches, but you get the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe if that 22% of so called liberals voted NO ...
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 07:55 PM by ronnykmarshall
We might have won.

Exit polls so that 22% of people the call themselves "liberal" vote FOR Prop 8!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I guess their idea of "liberal" is radically different from ours? n/t
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 08:18 PM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sure sounds like it, huh ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Those types are "liberal"...unless it's the idea of THEIR kid coming out.
...and they probably live in gated communities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. grass roots?!
bullshit. this was heavily funded by the crazy-ass mormons and dumbshit catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I' Not Talking About The Ads, I Am Talking About People...
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 08:22 PM by Median Democrat
I recall driving on PCH and passing several intersections with Yes On 8 demonstrators and their families with huge signs. The Yes on 8 folks had many, many volunteers. I did not see anything comparable from the No On 8 crowd in the suburbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Also, IMO, the Democratic party in general has a problem in how they reach out to minority voters.
Particularly with regard to progressive social positions.

We need to do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. The Dem Party wanted nothing to do with the issue
don't you think? They were afraid to lose votes for Democratic candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. all the cal dems did was endorse NO on 8.
As far as money went ... I don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well then that is VERY disappointing.
I'm sorry to hear that my rant against the CA Dem party yesterday seems to have been founded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Think Its A Mistake To Rely On A Political Party To Do Grassroots Work
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 PM by Median Democrat
I think its the other way around. For examples, unions provide the grassroots support in return for Democratic support. The Democratic party did not provide all the Obama volunteers. Rather, the Obama campaign relied on heavily on volunteers.

If the No On 8 folks were relying on the Democratic Party to do their Grass Roots organizing for them, that was arrogant and their mistake. That is a very top down approach in contrast to the Yes On 8 folks who relied heavily on organizing through churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Not being on the inside
I have no idea what the No on Prop 8 people (I did vote NO) were expecting. They failed in outreach efforts apparently. I think there was too much complacency by those who live in more liberal areas. Just like the Obama campaign got blue state people to canvass in red states, No on Prop 8 people from liberal counties should have gone into the inland areas of the state to help with the No on Prop 8 efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Now this is a more productive discussion.
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 08:20 PM by goodgd_yall
And I agree with all your observations.

Also, I'd like to point out that 10% of voters who voted "yes" described themselves as not being affiliated with any religion. This is a group that gays and lesbians have a chance of converting. With just half of that group voting "NO," Prop 8 would not have passed. There's little we can do to win over religious voters (I do realize there are religious voters who voted No, but I'm talking about the majority) but with a better laying out of our case (why "marriage" and not just "civil unions"----Federal tax laws, for instance) we might be able to reach the voters who did not base their vote on religious grounds.

Your post deserves a recommendation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is the message I wish we could hammer home to straight parents:
There is nothing new about gay men and women getting married and having children. They have always done this, always will.

But the traditional thing for a gay man to do, if he wants a life partner and children, is to marry an unsuspecting straight woman. They have one or more children and remain married for a few years, a few decades, or sometimes even for life -- while the gay person continues to get needs met outside the marriage.

So this is the real choice. It's not whether gay people will get married. It's whether you want gay people to marry your straight children, or your gay children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC