Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman in talks about caucusing with Senate GOP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:16 PM
Original message
Lieberman in talks about caucusing with Senate GOP
By ANDREW MIGA – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell is talking to Connecticut independent Sen. Joe Lieberman about the possibility of Lieberman caucusing with the GOP.

Lieberman's affiliation with Democrats is up in the air. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, angered by Lieberman's support of Republican John McCain for president, is considering yanking Lieberman's chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee as punishment.

Lieberman and Reid met Thursday to discuss Lieberman's options, including possible committee and subcommittee posts for him. Those talks are ongoing.

A Lieberman aide, who requested anonymity because the talks are confidential, said Friday that Lieberman and McConnell, R-Ky., have spoken in recent days about the possibility of Lieberman joining the GOP conference. McConnell spokesman Don Stewart would only confirm that the two men have had recent discussions.

Turn that coat Lieberman, kiss your career goodbye. Hello, Ned Lamont.



---more--


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jmKpTiyTBH1yacytLwgXGpckKB8AD94A939O0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. They will make him Persona Non Grata
When Holy Joe votes YES on pro-Choice issues, votes YES on pro-gay rights issues, votes YES on stem cell research.

Holy Joe is truly fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Joe was never the make or break vote on any of those issues before for our causes
Whenever he voted with us on any of those issues his vote never meant spit.

That was his cover.

He is a GOPer to the bone.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I believe that Holy Joe SERIOUSLY lost his way after September 11th
I mean Vice-President Gore chose this man as his running mate in 2000.

September 11th appeared to turn Holy Joe into a rabid pro-war fanatic and a rabid pro-Israel ass-licker at ALL costs.

Tragic actually, because on social issues Holy Joe IS liberal....the only things that connect him to the Republicans are being a neo-Con on war issues and being a fanatic on supporting Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pyrzqxgl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whatever party he's in, he's got at least 4 more years in the Senate.
I think we take the votes where he agrees with us, and criticize the hell out of him when he votes with the Republicans.
I don't give a damn what party he's caucusing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. That unctuous son of a bitch is now perfectly, totally, 100% irrelevant.
Let him caucus with whomever he pleases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can Senators be recalled?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman PROMISED the voters of Connecticut that he would caucus with the Democrats
In October 2006, after Lieberman lost the Connecticut Democratic Senate primary to challenger Ned Lamont and decided to run for his seat as an independent, blogger spazeboy posted a video in which Lieberman was asked: "Would you unequivocally ... caucus with the Democrats?" Lieberman responded: "I've said that 1,200 times." When asked to clarify with a "yes or no" answer, Lieberman responded: "Yes. Yes."


http://mediamatters.org/items/200807160008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
codjh9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, he's been a Repub. basically for how many years already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC