Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nate Silver: Uncounted Votes May Push Begich Past Stevens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:31 AM
Original message
Nate Silver: Uncounted Votes May Push Begich Past Stevens
Although Ted Stevens currently holds a lead of approximately 3,200 votes in ballots counted to date in Alaska's senate contest, there is good reason to believe that the ballots yet to be counted -- the vast majority of which are early and absentee ballots -- will allow Mark Begich to mitigate his disadvantage with Stevens and quite possibly pull ahead of him.

The reasoning behind this is simple: some early ballots have been processed, and among those ballots Begich substantially leads Stevens. A tally of Alaska's 40 house districts as taken from Alaska's Division of Elections webpage suggests that Begich has won about 61% of the early ballots counted so far, as compared with 48% of ballots cast on Election Day itself.


Combining the already-counted votes with our allocation of early, absentee and questioned ballots produces a projected total of 142,174 votes for Mark Begich and 139,258 for Ted Stevens -- a win for the Democrat by approximately 3,000 ballots:

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/uncounted-votes-may-push-begich-past.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick...... Nate Silver has been the genius on polls this election cycle
he did a good analysis on this one too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. This actually works FOR Sarah too..
Lisa-Lisa's term is up in '10...as is Sarah's.. I see her running against Lisa in the primaries, and winning..

By then, she'll be far enough away from Nov 4, and she might win that senate seat.. That would put her in DC , just in time for the wacky Freeps to push her into the '12 fray..

She would lose, of course, and then have to do the rest of her 6 yrs as an ineffective back-bencher (Think Katherine Harris)...and provide us all with some humor:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC