Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strange shite in the Alaska Senate race.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:50 PM
Original message
Strange shite in the Alaska Senate race.....
from AlterNet's PEEK:



In Alaska, Stevens-Begich Race is Far From Over

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 8:38 AM on November 9, 2008.

Stevens currently holds a tiny lead, but there are quite a large number of ballots yet to be counted.



Nate Silver on the phantom ballots of Alaska:

Stevens currently holds a lead of 3,353 votes, or about 1.5 percent of the votes tallied so far. But, there are quite a large number of ballots yet to count. According to Roll Call, these include "at least 40,000 absentee ballots, 9,000 early voting ballots, and an undetermined number of questionable ballots". Indeed, it seems possible that the number of "questionable" ballots could be quite high. So far, about 220,000 votes have been processed in Alaska. This compares with 313,000 votes cast in 2004. After adding back in the roughly 50,000 absentee and early ballots that Roll Call accounts for, that would get us to 270,000 ballots, or about a 14 percent drop from 2004. It seems unlikely that turnout would drop by 14 percent in Alaska given the presence of both a high-profile senate race and Sarah Palin at the top of the ticket.

But even if Begich were to make up ground and win a narrow victory, this would seem to represent a catastrophic failure of polling, as three polls conducted following the guilty verdict in Stevens' corruption trial had Begich leading by margins of 7, 8 and 22 points, respectively.


I agree with Scott Horton, the more likely explanation is that someone has simply "lost track" of a good chunk of the Alaska vote.

Palin and her fans have a vested interest in Stevens winning the senate seat. If he is reelected and steps down, Palin will appoint his successor. She couldn't appoint herself, but she could step down and have her Lt. Governor appoint her.

As I said before the election, I felt very relieved to see McCain falter in the final days of the election. When he couldn't remember Larry Eagleburger's name on Meet The Press, I found myself thinking, "Whew. Nobody's going to cheat for that guy."

I think a lot of people would stick their necks out for Sarah Palin.

Correction: Actually, Palin wouldn't get to appoint Stevens' replacement. Alaska changed the law a couple years back. There would be a special election. The next question is whether Palin knows this.


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/106296/in_alaska%2C_stevens-begich_race_is_far_from_over/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dittman, the Republican pollster,
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 01:18 PM by Blue_In_AK
was on the news last night trying to explain this away -- pathetically, I might add. http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?s=9315332

But after pondering what happened, Dittman has a new theory. He believes many Alaska Democrats stayed home, afraid of long lines at the polls and confident Barack Obama was going to win anyway.

"People thought there would be long lines, and they were told that they'd better bring a book and if you go vote it's gonna be hours, it's going to be cold outside," Dittman said. "And I think a lot of people thought, who would have otherwise voted Democratic, thought, 'Why should I endure that and spend all that time outside in the cold if my candidates don't need my vote? They're going to win anyway.'"


And then in typical victim fashion, the spokesperson from the Alaska Democrats agrees he may be right. (Is there a smiley for "exploding head"?)


As if Alaska Democrats aren't going to turn out in huge numbers to defeat Ted Stevens and Don Young?? I don't think so. Not to mention the fact that it was 7:00 p.m. here before Obama was announced the victor. Does he thinkg people weren't voting all day? And he thinks people are worried about standing in line when they stood outside for hours in February when it was 0 degrees trying to get into the Democratic caucus? I'm not buying it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You could use this:


Found it on a site saying free to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you.
It's perfect. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Palin cannot appoint his successor
she has to call a special election. The governor prior to her was a senator and ran for governor and then had the chutzpa to select his daughter to replace himself. This pissed off the people and the law was changed that they have to have a special election to fill a vacant senator seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC