Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And NOT Just At Gitmo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 05:36 PM
Original message
And NOT Just At Gitmo
And Not Just At Gitmo

Today's Washington Post has an article on another Bush detainee, only this one has been held in a Navy brig here in the US for the past five years without charges being brought.

Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri was close to going on trial for fraud when prosecutors marched into an Illinois courtroom with a demand. Dismiss the charges, they said, because President Bush had just designated the defendant an enemy combatant.

Marri's attorneys protested, but U.S. Attorney Jan Paul Miller declared that the military had already taken custody of the Qatari national, now deemed an al-Qaeda sleeper agent. "There is no longer a judicial proceeding before this court," he said.

With that, Marri was whisked to a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., where he has spent more than five years. His case raises a question with vast implications for presidential power and civil liberties: Can the military indefinitely detain, without charge, a U.S. citizen or legal resident seized on U.S. soil? (Emphasis added)

more at:
http://cabdrollery.blogspot.com/2008/11/and-not-just-at-gitmo.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it is not just GTMO
Does anyone really believe those secret prisons have closed?


ALL military prisons should be checked as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How do the Judge and the prosecutor, as officers of the court,
manage to justify their inaction in allowing the military to take custody of the man? If they have any conscience at all they they shouldn't be able to look in a mirror or get a night's sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. With this
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 07:03 PM by Solly Mack
Military Commissions Act of 2006

http://www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/commissions.html

http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1004-35.htm

They justify it by claiming they were just following the law...and thanks to those members of Congress who voted YES - they are

As for a conscience...they couldn't possibly have one to hide behind a criminal law that way

At the time of his detention, Bush claimed the power to do as he did...with the MCA of 2006, Congress gave Bush legal cover





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC