Poor treatment given Bush was unfair(Columbus Dispatch, November 10, 2008)These past seven-plus years have been nothing but divisive. Aside from a few short weeks after Sept. 11, 2001, we have been inundated with cries from the left: "President Bush lied," "Impeach Bush," "Convict Bush," "Bush stole the election," etc.
Sadly, these statements are not just being made by a few far-left extremists. We hear these statements coming from the media, filmmakers, members of Congress and, most shamefully, past presidents. The treatment George W. Bush has received during his presidency is disgraceful.
Why is it that just because we have elected the most liberal, inexperienced candidate in the history of the United States, we now have to show unity?
Weren't we being told by leaders and pundits of the Democratic Party that if John McCain were to win the election, there would be riots in the streets? Is that the civility and unity we should always expect from the Democratic Party?
The two previous presidential elections gave us nonstop coverage of supposed voter fraud and stolen elections. Interesting how it is that when a Democrat wins the election, there is no media coverage of voter fraud, intimidation and disenfranchisement, even though we know that was happening (for example, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, GOP observers removed from polling stations, military absentee ballots not being counted).
There is nothing virtuous about civility and unity when I am being asked to compromise my principles. I refuse to unify with a political party that keeps telling us and the world the United States is a terrible country. Call that uncivil if you like; I call it proud to be an American.
TODD DICKEY
Hilliard
Hmm, he's "proud to be an American". That gives me an idea for a song!
Two things strike me about Todd's letter:
(1) Even after pointing out that bush was criticized not only by the left but also by "the media, filmmakers, members of Congress and past presidents", it never even
occurs to Todd that the reason for the universal condemnation of bush (now ~75% in America, a greater percentage worldwide) could possibly be because
he has been a terrible president. No, it must be "divisive bias".
(2) I wonder which "leaders and pundits of the Democratic Party" (?) prophesied "riots in the streets" if McCain were elected. I watched MSNBC a lot before the election and I don't remember hearing this (though I did see the idea mentioned often on FR).
Geographical note: Hilliard is a pleasant but very Republican suburb just west of Columbus.