Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I don't vote. It's a symbolic gesture."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:48 PM
Original message
"I don't vote. It's a symbolic gesture."
View hosts chastise Olbermann for not voting
David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Monday November 10, 2008

When MSNBC's Keith Olbermann accepted an invitation to appear on ABC's The View on Monday, he may have felt he had ample reason to be nervous. "Wish me good luck," he told his own audience in announcing the upcoming inquisition.

"No wonder you're afraid," crowed Barbara Walters. "For years, Countdown with Keith Olbermann -- and MSNBC -- has been Republican-bashing headquarters. But what is the future of the show now, now that your people are in? What are you going to do, Keith Olbermann?"

"Welcome, by the way," Walters added more cordially. "Are you scared to death to be with us? We hope so."

"Then good, yes, I am," Olbermann replied obligingly.

The program's hosts then began to lay into Olbermann over everything from his on-air partisanship to his attempts to avoid partisanship by not voting.

Elisabeth Hasselbeck led off, asking "What do you say to critics who claim you've been particularly soft on Democrats?"

"I run that question past Senator Clinton, because she didn't think I was easy on her," Olbermann replied. "She's still kind of mad at me. ... They don't invite me to the parties any more," he added, hanging his head in mock-sorrow.

"Bill O'Reilly hates you," suggested Joy Behar.

"Who?" asked Olbermann.

"He doesn't hate you, he says you hate him," Behar amplified. "I said to him, 'Why does Keith Olbermann hate you,' and he said 'Because he's jealous of me.' How do you respond to that?"

"What was the name again?" Olbermann responded, causing the show's hosts to break up.

Hasselbeck, however, was quick to return to the attack. "I was watching a football game one time and you snuck in there this Palin comment," she noted, referring to an incident in October which was publicized by Michelle Malkin and widely repeated by conservative bloggers. "I thought, 'You know, even in my football game, Keith, why?' You just can't hold back at all?"

"I actually said, 'Would I say this if I was still just being a sportscaster?'" Olbermann replied. "Is it enough of a cultural reference? ... And I said, 'I think so.'" He added, "There was some restraint involved."

"You're going to have trouble now, aren't you?" Walters asked, as she had at the start of the show. "Now that the people you like most are in."

"They could easily screw up," Olbermann retorted, insisting that he will say so if they do. However, he readily admitted that he hopes Sarah Palin will stick around because "she's an unending font of material."

"I was reading that you don't vote," Behar stated. "Did you really mean that, and did you vote this time?"

"I don't vote," Olbermann confirmed. "It's the only thing I can do that suggests, even, that I don't have a horse in the race."

"Then how can you be angry and have a platform if you don't vote?" asked Sherri Shepherd.

"It's a symbolic gesture," Olbermann explained.

"It's a bad role model, I'm sorry" commented Behar tartly.

As the hosts began talking over one another, Walters shushed them to give Olbermann a concluding plug for his show. "Oh, forgive me, master," she begged. "I just don't want to be the Worst Person this week."

This video is from ABC's The View, broadcast November 10, 2008: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/View_hosts_chastise_Olbermann_for_not_1110.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. too bad Kieth didn't call Babs on her lying
about the transition from Clinton to dumbaya, she really needs to be reminded what honest means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting. Do they talk that way about Hannity or Rush?
I must admit I am surprised that Keith says he doesn't vote. The 'symbolic gesture' thing is perplexing.

But he does enough to help that it's going to take a hell of a lot more than that to get me mad at him.

Go KO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ouch. I just lost some respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because he doesn't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What about that makes you lose respect for him?
Edited on Mon Nov-10-08 03:02 PM by Oregone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think voting is a civic duty, and when people don't, I lose respect for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thinking doesn't make it so.
Some think saluting the flag is a civic duty, as is sacrificing one's life for the state. But these are merely thoughts, and not universal truths. I lose respect for people who hold highly lofty and stringent ideas about civic duty, based on dogma rather than rationalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We agree, then,
that respecting someone or not is a highly personal decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. If he doesn't vote, he is in no position to criticize elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. First admendment speech is dependent upon "civic duty"?
I thought free speech was just that: free. Being a citizen he is in the ultimate position to criticize any elected official at any time he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Legally, yes. But, one loses all credibility
if they do not act. If you don't vote, you don't exist to the politicians and your voice is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Credibility is rather arbitrary I guess...
Edited on Mon Nov-10-08 04:05 PM by Oregone
I would judge a journalist's credibility on their impartial and truthful reporting in a consistent manner, rather than who they did or did not vote for (or their choice to abstain from the process).

Its silly to say a journalist doesn't have credibility because they didn't participate in an act completely unrelated to their job function. People who lie are not credible, but people who do not vote?!? Come on now.

Credible: capable of being believed; "completely credible testimony"; "credible information"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I say an American loses credibility
for not participating. Occupation is irrelevant. If one doesn't vote, I don't give a damn about what they think is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So people must perform acts as a prerequistie for being taken seriously by you?
Why set the bar so low with voting? Hell, some people use military service as thresh hold for having a valuable opinion. Some may only take you seriously if you not only voted, but voted Republican. Maybe we should only give a damn about what people think who can sing the Star Spangled Banner in perfect Falsetto. Or how about only take people seriously who are legally married with children? Lets start subdividing up the American population into small groups of those who are "credible" real Americans, and those who are worthless shit because they do not meet arbitrary standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I am just saying,
if you don't vote, you do not exist to the elected representatives. Seriously. It is the easiest and most basic act. People don't have to vote, of course, I respect their right to do whatever they want.

But, if they do not vote, and then open their mouths to complain about those in power, I won't listen. It has nothing to do, for me, with Patriotism, or civic duty. Only that one who does not take that basic action does not register in the representative's decision making process. How can I even listen to their complaint when they refuse to voice it in the place where it matters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Complaints are meant to be voiced in the public forum. That is where free speech matters
Edited on Mon Nov-10-08 04:34 PM by Oregone
Votes are meant to be cast in an election, where they matter. A complaint is not and will never be a vote.

Although one may not exist to the representative as a fraction of a hundredth of a percent, they can exist in the public forum to influence hundreds of thousands of others with the power of free speech (which does impact that representative that they supposedly do not exist to).

No one should have to perform any act to be considered American enough to be "credible". Frankly, it is a really dangerous precedent to set. Judge those on the content that they contribute, especially journalists, rather than an irrelevant act they may or may not do in their free time that is considered private. Your reasoning gives Bill Reilly more means to complain than someone who bases their career on the pursuit of truth. This is not an approach consistent with a fair and reasonable society.

"How can I even listen to their complaint when they refuse to voice it in the place where it matters?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalkydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. While
I am disappointed that he didn't vote, I haven't lost any respect for him at all. I can tolerate him more than i can tolerate Lou Dobbs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Dobbs is just repulsive - his voice, his over-whitened teeth, his race-baiting over immigration...
While he may occasionally make a decent comment that I agree with, overall I can't stand the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Keith said in the end of the clip
that if he lived in more of a battleground state, he would certainly vote. But honestly, what is 1 more Democratic vote in New York going to do... I agree voting is paramount to a democracy but he is doing more for this country than 1 vote in a highly democratic state currently can. Go KO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. "I don't vote- it's my way of giving myself the finger"
Dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. It has only been recently that it was considered ethical for
journalists to vote, and there are still some folks around in the profession (to the extent the 'profession' still exists).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Exactly right.
Much the same as so many, many active duty military not voting - it is their duty to serve whomever is CIC, and taking a partisan stance can interfere with their call to duty. At least, that's the way it was 30 years ago. My mom told me recently that she & my dad didn't vote from 1964 to 1990, when they retired and settled to civilian life. I had never realized it, even though I grew up on bases around the world.

Journalists would not vote, or take an active part in politics because they had to report impartially on all politicians. Olberman doesn't pick on conservative politicians because he is so biased - it's just that they make it so easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I didn't know this.
Thanks for the information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Many newsrooms discourage their reporters and copy editors from participating in caucuses
because it requires a public show of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. My dad was chief of the desk at several dailies around the
country before he moved into better position at the CSM. He worked the 'slot', passing paper copy out to the guys on the 'rim' back in the day when there were those cool pneumatic systems that carried hard copy from one part of the building to another.

He voted, but never campaigned publicly after Adlai Stevenson's second defeat. He also recommended that his team avoided any public statements of support or preference. Vote if you want to, just don't talk about it. In those days being a journalist meant something pretty important to the folks who pursued the profession. I don't think it's so true anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Being a journalist is very important to those who pursue it now.
They certainly aren't in it for the money.

I disagree with forbidding journalists from participating in caucuses. God forbid you have smart, involved, civic-minded people in that profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. He doesn't vote?
Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. I could see abstaining from the national election, and voting for local races.
For the traditional reasons cited above. (Keith doesn't really cover the local stuff on his show, so he wouldn't have a dog in that hunt.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. I understand there are many journalists and reporters who don't vote
For them, it's to ensure they are impartial as possible. Most of the ones I know personally are registered as Independents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarbyUSMC Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. Keith and George Carlin probably have the same view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Interesting. I think he is a good role model, but I think all Americans
should vote. I am a Democrat who lives in a very Blue State, Maryland, but I like to be able to participate in the process of government. I guess KO does participate by his commentary, but still a vote is also a private thing. He doesn't have to advertise who he'll vote for on his show.

Also, I think everyone has a right to free speech, whether they vote or they don't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC