Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin on Goofiness - The Mudflats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:25 PM
Original message
Palin on Goofiness - The Mudflats
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/11/10/palin-on-goofiness/

Welcome to the second installment of dissecting the Palin Wasilla interview. It’s kind of like eating junk food. If you consume too much at once, it can wreak havoc with your innards. So, now that I’ve digested that heaping pile of mental pork rinds, I’m ready for the next batch. (deep breath)

The theme for this helping? “Goofiness.” Are there other things we could be talking about? Yes. But Palin keeps bringing this stuff up.

Here are Palin’s thoughts about her perceived unfair treatment by the media.

Regarding information regarding my record that is now out there, much of it that was based on misinformation was a very very frustrating thing to have to go through when the record was never corrected. We would try to correct the record and too many in the media chose not to make those corrections or clarifications, and then I felt too often we were a bit defenseless in so many things that were reported wrongly that could have so easily been corrected just based on facts and…

Q: What kinds of things are you talking about?

Oh, like um, oh some of the goofy things like who was Trig’s mom…uh, you know and well, I’m Trig’s mom, and do you want to see my medical records to prove that…and days would go by before uh mainstream media would even try to correct that, that yeah, OK, it’s proven that she is actually Trig’s mom.

OK, I’m going to talk a bit about this since Sarah brought it up first. To answer your question Governor, yes. A big enough deal was made out of this issue, right or wrong, that YES people did want to “see your medical records to prove that.” Wouldn’t Palin’s life have been simpler and less “frustrating” if she had done this? These rumors started the first week of her candidacy….back in the beginning of September and have been a huge distraction and topic of discussion ever since.

Even Obama released his birth certificate, just to prove once and for all that he was born in Hawaii, and was eligible for the presidency. Seems silly to have to do this? Yes. Did it answer people’s questions and fears? Yes. Did it put the issue to rest once and for all? No. Because people were still unconvinced, the birth certificate was made public from the hospital in Hawaii where he was born. Done. Rumors put to rest.

Despite the comment above (in bold), Palin has never released medical records that “prove” anything. She released a doctor’s note summarizing her medical records. But let’s just say that’s good enough for us, and we believe that she is Trig’s mother. She released the doctor’s letter less than 12 hours before the polls opened on Election Day. So….how, then, did “days go by before the mainstream media would even try to correct that” and say “OK, it’s proven she’s Trig’s mom.” There were no days to go by, and nothing released that actually proved anything. So, why is she bringing this up? (shrug)

Wouldn’t you think that by now, she would have actually released her medical records, and Trig’s birth certificate, just to settle the question? The longer this goes on, the more bizarre it gets.

And take a look at what Palin is wearing in the video.

Palin’s father, Chuck Heath, said his daughter spent the day Saturday trying to figure out what belongs to the RNC.

“She was just frantically … trying to sort stuff out,” Heath said. “That’s the problem, you know, the kids lose underwear, and everything has to be accounted for.

“Nothing goes right back to normal,” he said.

Heath dismissed the clothes controversy as “ridiculous,” and said his daughter told him the only clothing or accessories she had personally purchased in the last four months was a pair of shoes.

And yet, there she is in her new designer duds. You can be reasonably assured that if it’s sleek, shiny and black, Palin didn’t own it before she left. Maybe she’s just getting one more use out of the rental gear before it’s all shipped back to the RNC. Wouldn’t you think after all the bad press over the wardrobe, that when she dressed for the interview she would have left the Neiman Marcus stuff in the closet? (shrug)

As much as babies and clothing are the least of our worries, for some reason, Palin won’t let us forget them, and continues to be her own worst enemy whenever she opens her mouth to the very media she accuses of being the problem.

(Still more to come on this interview….had enough pork rinds for now…..ugh.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Blue! How are you feeling
about Palin now? It takes a run for VP to bring out the 'real' in people, I guess. :D

And I love mudflats! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, she shocked the shit out of me
out there on the national stage, I have to say. I'll admit it. From what we saw in the previous two years, I would NEVER, EVER have believed she would be this bad.

I think in the future, instead of saying that someone is "two-faced," we can just say they're "Palined." It works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Palin = "beyond the pale" from now on.
The word pale derives ultimately from the Latin word palus, meaning stake. (Palisade and impale are derived from the same root.) In this case it literally refers to a stake (or pole) that forms part of a protective fence around a settlement. From this came the figurative meaning of 'boundary', and the concept of a pale as an area within which local laws were valid.<3>

The phrase "beyond the pale", meaning to go beyond the limits of law or decency, was in use by the mid-17th century. The first example known to the Oxford English Dictionary is in a work by Sir John Harington, The History of Polindor and Flostella, written sometime before 1612 but published in 1657: "Both Dove-like roved forth beyond the pale / To planted Myrtle-walk."<4> The phrase is possibly a reference to the general sense of boundary, not to any of the particular pales that bore that name,<5>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Beyond the Pale...
Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Blue What Is Your Take On The Drop In Voter Turnout In Alaska?
With Palin on the ticket as a VP Candidate, and Stevens and Young up for reelection, how can there be a drop in turnout over the 2004 numbers?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. None of us feel right about it.
Even the local mainstream TV and newspapers have commented on how hard to explain it is. The Republican pollsters, who predicted Begich and Berkowitz wins, are flummoxed. There's just something very odd about this election, and I hope someone gets to the bottom of it.

2004 was weird, but this one really takes the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The guest on Rachel Maddow tonight said Stevens' pollster predicted a Begich win...
... after the election was over. Curious to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, it's hard to know who's behind this weirdness.
Edited on Tue Nov-11-08 12:32 AM by Blue_In_AK
I can imagine that there's all kinds of in-fighting going on in the Alaska Republican party. Sarah was never a favorite of the party honchos, so I can't imagine that they would want her to have Ted's seat. It's almost like they'd rather have Mark win than give Sarah a shot at it. Could that possibly be? Who would benefit from Ted Stevens winning and then having to give up his seat? Sarah Palin.

Sarah's lieutenant governor and lapdog Sean Parnell is in charge of elections here, like a secretary of state would be in a lot of states. It just kind of makes you wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-10-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. "it’s proven that she is actually Trig’s mom."
Um, NO, Sarah, it has NOT been proven. But come Dec 18th (give or take a few days), feel free to have the "new baby" side by side with Trig out in public. Shouldn't be a problem, right??? No renting someone else's baby for the photo op, either, OK??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC