I. Know the Enemy: The MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Did you know that there is something bigger and meaner and more ruthless than the Military Industrial Complex? The Military Industrial Complex plays upon our fears of foreign threats to encourage us to stockpile weapons we may never need while discouraging negotiations that could bring lasting peace. It’s a big waste of money, but it does not to result in harm---unless some village idiot president out of Texas decides to use the stockpiled weapons.
The
Medical Industrial Complex exploits our fear of sickness and death to create new, expensive often ineffective sometimes dangerous treatments which are foisted upon us while preventive care that might actually keep us healthy is denied
all in the name of corporate profits Sound like the stuff of science fiction? Read on.
http://www.edwardgoldsmith.com/page191.htmlToday the same can be said for America's health policy. If anything, the 'medical industrial complex' as it is increasingly referred to, is even bigger and more powerful than the military industrial complex. Its turnover is massive. A small group of companies that make medically-related machines and drugs and sell health services, is responsible for fully a third of the $600 billion spent on the nation's health in 1989.
Their influence on decision-making is obviously enormous, exerted in such a way as to ensure health policies are no longer necessarily taken in the interest of improving the nation's health but "in the interest of increasing sales, maximising efficiency and containing costs". To satisfy these requirements the accent is on maximising expenditure on technological interventions, regardless of their ineffectiveness.
Not surprisingly, the cost of medical care in the US goes up from year to year. Today it adds up to almost 12 percent of the gross national product. By the year 2000 on current trends, some 15 percent of gross national product will be spent on high-tech medical care. The fact that it goes on increasing in this way suggests that it is very ineffective and that, in spite of the billions spent on it, the health of the nation continues to deteriorate.
II. “Just the Facts Ma’am” Alarming Statistics About America’s Ailing Health Care System Fact : The United States spends more person per year than any other country for health care under our current
health care is a luxury not a right system . We spend $5,267/year per person which is over 50% higher than any other country on earth. Switzerland is the next most spendthrift country. Most other countries with universal health care, like Canada, France, Great Britain spend half as much per citizen per year.
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=283969The above article compares waiting lists and medical resources such as CT scanners, nurses, doctors, hospital beds and finds that the countries with more efficient universal health care systems actually have
more health care resources and many of them do not have longer waits and the people have
better access than they do in the United States. So, why is health care so much more expensive in the U.S.? The authors suggest that one reason might be because health care services are
overpriced in the unregulated United States health care system.
Fact: The United States ranks at the bottom of industrialized nations on a list of health indicators (even though we spend twice as much for health care per person) . You read that correctly. We pay exorbitant rates for
shitty healthy care in this country. While the people in France are getting a Cadillac, we are getting a rusty old Vega.
Here is a Commonwealth Fund study which shows that the U.S. ranked last among 19 industrialized nations in tackling the problem of preventable death----deaths caused by disease which could be prevented with proper health care. Be sure to check out the graphs. Maybe we should all print them out and show them to the next person who tries to tell us that universal health care is
scary . Death is scarier, and the authors estimate that 100,000 lives per year could be saved if the United States copied the (cheaper) health care practices of some of these other countries.
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=640980 How about infant mortality? Don’t ask unless you want to hear the answer.
Infant mortality in the United States is still higher than in many other industrialized countries, with progress stalling this decade, the U.S. government said on Wednesday.
The United States ranked 29th lowest in the world in infant mortality in 2004, the latest year for which comparative global figures were available, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a report.
This extends a worsening trend for the United States in global infant mortality rankings. The 2004 ranking compares to 27th in 2000, 23rd in 1990 and 12th in 1960, the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics said.
"Infant mortality is one of the most important indicators of the health of a nation, as it is associated with a variety of factors such as maternal health, quality and access to medical care, socioeconomic conditions and public health practices," the report said.
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_70500.htmlAnd look at where we rank on child death rates. Just ahead of Poland and eastern European countries.
http://www.mindfully.org/Health/2007/US-Death-Rate1may07.htmMost distressing of all,
life expectancy is actually stagnating or decreasing for 19% of U.S. women in selected economically disadvantaged regions of the country, including Appalachia, the South and Texas. Researchers believe that this is a result of increased smoking, obesity and lack of access to health care. For life expectancy to decrease in time of peace is almost unheard of in an industrialized country.
http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/news/news5.27.08.asp Take away point: the US spends twice as much per person per year on health care to get results that put us at the bottom of industrialized nations in terms of overall health.So, when a lobbyist or a Republican says
We can’t afford universal health insurance right now you snap back
We can’t afford not to change our health care system right now .
Trimming our health care expenditures by 7.5% of the GNP would be a tidy bit of cash.
III. What Are They Doing Right (And We Doing Wrong?) They (countries which offer comprehensive cradle to grave universal health insurance) inevitably begin to realize that they can keep their citizens healthier----and costs down----by taking measures to prevent diseases. These measures include early childhood interventions to promote exercise and prevent obesity, programs to discourage smoking, environmental cleanup, family planning services among others. All of these are relatively cheap compared to the medical problems they prevent like AIDS, emphysema, heart disease, diabetes, stroke.
These measures are resisted by the Medical Industrial Complex, which stands to lose money as people become less sick.
From the first link above, the one about the Medical Industrial Complex.
Aaron Wildavsky of the Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California, considers that
"the medical system (doctors, drugs, hospitals) affects about 10 percent of the usual indices for measuring health". This means, as Ross Hume Hall notes, that
"90 percent of all illness is unaffected by high-tech. medicine". The problem is what Aaron Wildavsky <2> calls
"the great medical equation: medical care equals health". The truth of the matter is the best way to assure the health of a nation is not by spending money on high technology health care but by creating those social and ecological conditions in which the incidence of disease is minimised. In the 19th century the accent was on prevention and it was very effective. As Ross Hume Hall notes,
"the engineering of sanitary sewers and public water mains were the major factor in wiping out tuberculosis, cholera and typhoid, the major causes of death in the 19th century."
But prevention does little to satisfy the short-term economic requirements of the medical industrial complex.
In other words, the Medical Industrial Complex
wants you glued to your television set, an unfiltered Camel in one hand, a beer in the other, a plate of nachos balanced on your knee. The Medical Industrial Complex salivates when it sees young men and women having unprotected sex. The Medical Industrial Complex knows that smog means full hospital beds and lots of requests for durable medical equipment.
As long as we maintain our current system, it will pay to keep Americans as sick and as miserable as possible. As long as every single elderly American is fully insured by Medicare but tens of millions of young working Americans have no access to preventive health services, our country will continue to pay tens of thousands of dollars per person to treat the end stages of years of neglect of conditions that could have been controlled with a little diet, a little exercise, a little counseling----to the delight of the companies that make the pills and the heart catheters and the MRIs and the surgical tools and the schools that turn out the cardiothoracic surgeons.
For the want of the nail, the war was lost. For the want of a cholesterol check, you life was lost.
IV. Won’t We Have to Increase Our Public Spending on Health Care A LOT ? Even now, the Republicans are accepting money to filibuster health reform legislation in the Senate. Lobbyists for the health insurance and medical technology industries have their arguments ready. Universal health care is
socialized medicine It will bankrupt the economy. We can not possibly spend as much public money as the countries in Europe do on health care----
Guess what? We already do.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0934554.htmlLook at that! We spend more public funds (as a percent of our GNP) than either Canada or Italy on health care. My mom got run over by a Vespa in Italy. When she went to the ER, they did not ask for an insurance card. She got state of the art medical care---and no bill.
We spend more public money on health care in the U.S. than they do in Italy, but if she was run over by a scooter here, the first thing they would ask when they wheeled her through the hospital emergency room door would be "Can we have your driver's license and your medical insurance card?"
We already spend the money. All we have to do is spend it in a sensible way. If the billions of dollars that are currently being wasted on the treatment of preventable disease could be spent on a coordinated program of illness prevention, we could insure more people, keep them as healthy as they do in places like France and save a bundle on premiums to health insurers who collect money from people who never get sick.
United Health, Pfizer and HCA are among those hoping that health care reform dies a grisly death in the U.S. Senate next year just like it did in Bill Clinton's first term---otherwise they may see 6-7% of the nation's wealth slip through their fingers.
V. Because You Read All the Way Through This, From Monty Python, the Machine that Goes "Ping: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxOu1DyVQV8