Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 11:51 AM
Original message |
Schumer and Durbin Want Lieberman Stripped of Homeland Security Chair |
|
Newsweek's Howard Fineman on Keith Olbermann: going to leave it up to a vote I think. What my sources tell me is that there's likely to be a vote next Tuesday. The Senate Democrats will caucus when they come back for the lame duck session. They'll all go into a room, Joe Lieberman will make his case for maintaining his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee, then there will be a secret ballot vote.
Obama's opinion is sort of on record via Harry Reid, and we'll see how it goes.
Interestingly, people like Dick Durbin who is the first Democrat in the Senate -- the first Senator, and from Illinois, to support Barack Obama -- is really loaded for bear about Lieberman, he wants to kick Lieberman off that Chairmanship. Chuck Schumer, the head of the Campaign Committee likewise.
So it could be a very close vote, and it'll be left to the secret ballot of the Senators. You've got Evan Bayh and you've got Chris Dodd who are supporting Lieberman, but there are a lot of other people who are still angry at him for the very comments you were talking about just a little while ago.
One point I think needs to be made. This isn't about Joe Lieberman maintaining membership in a country club as a matter of feel-good "bipartisanship." There's actually a job that needs doing here, and when Chris Dodd and Evan Bayh say that they want Lieberman to retain his chairmanship, they are saying that the extraordinary waste, graft, greed and cronyism that have built the Department of Homeland Security to a bloated, ineffectual taxpayer-funded behemoth under Joe Lieberman is just fine.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/11/schumer-and-durbin-want-lieberman-stripped-of-homeland-security-chair/
|
no limit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. why would any democrat vote to keep that asshole on as chair of homeland security? |
|
I can understand letting him on committees that deal with domestic issues but he shouldn't be anywhere near any foreign policy position.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Sounds like Chris Dodd and Evan Bayh need to get some e-mail and phone calls |
Jim__
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
jjanpundt
(284 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Leave him as chairman and then dismantle Homeland Security. |
|
Make FEMA a cabinet level position again and combine, disband departments that duplicate efforts. That would also save some money.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. As do I. He has no honor. His word means nothing. |
|
His word means less than nothing. He will not hesitate to lie to achieve his own ends. He has displayed animosity toward our President-Elect. I do not want a liar in that chair. He will deliver the hemlock to Obama's administration with his own hands if it suits him.
Ominous clouds hover over his head. Boot the bitch!!!
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It's time to write my Dem Senators. Strip his chair. It needs to be done. Give him some sub-committe |
|
where he can't do too much harm.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-11-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I want him to caucus but I'm absolutely against him keeping his chairs |
|
especially since he didn't do his job on Homeland security which was government oversight.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |