Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just wondering. What does prop 8 mean for Ellen DeGeneres?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 11:59 AM
Original message
Just wondering. What does prop 8 mean for Ellen DeGeneres?
You know, that is just really awful if it means that all those people who finally thought they could get married are now illegal - or at least not married in the eyes of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not to mention George Takei (Star Trek) who just got married a couple weeks ago.
I saw him and his partner interviewed just before the wedding and they both looked so happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know if Prop 8 invalidates marriages that have already taken place
I did hear Ellen give a major shout out to Keith O this morning, for his special comment decrying the passage of Prop 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. No word yet on whether it has an effect on previous marriages is there?
I also suspect the CA courts will nullify prop 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I dunno. Maybe she and several others should demand to be arrested since they are now
illegally married. That would get some good press for us. "Gays thrown in jail for marrying."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I heard that it will not affect those already married
They will still retain legal marriage status. It only affects and prevents marriage rights AFTER the vote passed.

Assholes:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's still up in the air.
Jerry Brown says this shouldn't be retroactive though, so that's promising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. How could it NOT nullify those past marriages?
If it doesn't, then you'll have two groups, one enjoying married status, one not. I don't know how they're going to reconcile that discrepancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There is no language in the prop that makes it retroactive, therefore it does not
affect currently married couples. (According to Whoopi on the View the other morning.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think it's going to require some clarification from a higher court
Even though the language wasn't specifically retroactive, it could be argued that 'recognition' of marriage is an ongoing active process, and that banning the recognition nullifies the marriages. On the other hand, there's the idea that people should be allowed to rely on the law as it currently stands, so people who made life-changing decisions nder one framework should not be retroactively punished.

Personally, I'd like to see Prop 8 tossed out entirely, but I'm not sanguine about it. If I had to guess, I'd put my money on prop 8 being allowed to stand and existing marriages converted to domestic partnerships... :(

(Caveat: IANAL.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The former, legal marriages remain
legal through a grandfather clause.

This is true if it's not retroactive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's in the US Constitution - "ex post facto"....Google it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC