Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scorched Earth: Maddow: New rule kicks Patriot Act foes 'right in the teeth'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:17 PM
Original message
Scorched Earth: Maddow: New rule kicks Patriot Act foes 'right in the teeth'
More of Smirky's program to leave nothing of value behind.

ttp://rawstory.com/news/2008/Spying_victim_New_Bush_rules_are_1112.html

The Bush administration has been planning since last spring to issue a final burst of federal regulations just before leaving office. It was recently announced that over 90 new regulations would be finalized before November 22 -- 60 days prior to the end of Bush's term -- making them difficult, though not impossible, for President Obama to reverse.

Although many of the regulations have to do with energy and the environment, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow noted on Tuesday that there's also "one that'll kick opponents of the Patriot Act right in the teeth."

The proposed regulation "would allow state and local law enforcement agencies to collect intelligence on individuals and organizations even if the information is unrelated to any criminal matter," Maddow explained. She added, "Even if they weren't already watching you -- they soon could be."

Maddow was joined by the Nation's sports correspondent, Dave Zirin, who began by complaining about Bush, "Hemorrhoids are more popular than this man. Why is he making laws?"

(end snip)

As the rest of the article points out, we either have a constitution, or we don't. Smirky is sprintin to the finish line to destroy what is left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey NANCY PELOSI..???? HELLO????
Has he granted a blanket immunity for everyone who kissed his ass for the past eight years also?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. huffingtonpost has an article that says he screwed up. the deadline
wasn't 60 days, it was in the summer past. he blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is Bush still making laws?
Pink Tutu Dems like Nancy and Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Why is he making laws?" Because he can and no one will stop him?
Didn't the poo flinging chimp reverse a lot of President Clinton's environmental policies that he put into place prior to him leaving office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And Obama will reverse them as soon as he gets in nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh I hope so!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did you not read the post....
High powered lawyers are writing these to make them near impossible to reverse. Its not as easy as you make it sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Couldn't they be declared unconstitutional?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. By THIS court?
Don't count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Is there any way you can think of to stop him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. signing statement
& rigorously ignoring the goppies who will claim that magically when Obama does it it's wrong & illegal, but not when Bush did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. humm... maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. There's a question of the legality of the laws
...much like Bush's signing statements and other artifacts of his time at 1600. That will help.

Too, Obama knows from the law and has hitherto shown no signs of underestimating the mendacity of the Reeps: in fact, he has already announced his intention of undoing a number of executive orders as soon as his butt hits the chair at his new office on 1/20/09.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. KO had a good bit of news concerning this on his show tonite....
Clinton may have put some wording in some law while he was in office that will make this easier. More to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps Sen. Lieberman, Chrm of HS and Government Affairs will call a hearing.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fourth Amendment
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 03:42 PM by wroberts189

without probable cause people will be free from searches of their papers and effects.

clear as glass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC