Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ditch the smooth transition. The people voted for change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:33 AM
Original message
Ditch the smooth transition. The people voted for change
From "The Nation" (via The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/14/obama-white-house-wall-street)
Instead of accepting the corrupted bail-out and reassuring Wall Street, Obama's team must start doing the hard stuff now

... Of equally dubious legality are the equity deals the treasury has negotiated with many of the banks. According to Congressman Barney Frank, one of the architects of the legislation that enables the deals: "Any use of these funds for any purpose other than lending - for bonuses, for severance pay, for dividends, for acquisitions of other institutions ... is a violation of the act." Yet this is exactly how the funds are being used...

...Yes, there is only one president at a time, but that president needed the support of powerful Democrats - including Obama - to get the bail-out passed. Now that it is clear the Bush administration is violating the terms to which both parties agreed, the Democrats have not just the right, but a grave responsibility, to intervene forcefully...

...{Yet}, the Democrats, including Obama, appear to believe that the need to soothe the market should govern all key economic decisions in the transition period. Which is why, just days after a euphoric victory for "change", the mantra abruptly shifted to "smooth transition" and "continuity".


I hope BamMan is listening, and not just to Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The change many of us want is competency and integrity
and someone who knows what it means to work for a living. Its an over-reach to think the mandate is strictly for an extreme democratic agenda versus an agenda thats simply good for working Americans and the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I am confused? Truly, do not understand your comment.
You think it good that we do nothing to stop the looting? That to (try to) stop it would be an "extreme democratic agenda?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. If I wanted smooth, I'd vote Republican.
What part of change don't they get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC