Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dartmouth Analysis - Remaining Uncounted MN votes favor Franken

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:43 PM
Original message
Dartmouth Analysis - Remaining Uncounted MN votes favor Franken
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 04:54 PM by brooklynite
Residual Votes in the 2008 Minnesota Senate Race

Jonathan W. Chipman (Director, Applied Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Departments of Geography and Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College)
Michael C. Herrony (Visiting Associate Professor of Government, Harvard University, and Associate Professor of
Government, Dartmouth College)
Jeffrey B. Lewis (Associate Professor of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles)

Abstract

The 2008 United States Senate race in Minnesota is one of the closest electoral contests in recent history: as of this writing, out of over 2.9 million ballots cast only 206 votes separate incumbent Republican Senator Norm Coleman and his Democratic challenger, Al Franken. The Minnesota Senate race is slated to be recounted starting on November 19, 2008, and a key issue in the recount will be the approximately 34 thousand residual votes associated with it. A Senate residual vote is, roughly speaking, the product of a ballot that lacks a recorded Senate vote, and in the Minnesota Senate race there is no doubt that the number of residual votes dwarfs the margin that separates Coleman from Franken. We show using a combination of precinct voting returns from the 2006 and 2008 General Elections that patterns in Senate race residual votes are consistent with, one, the presence of a large number of Democratic-leaning voters, in particular African-American voters, who appear to have deliberately skipped voting in the Coleman Franken Senate contest and, two, the presence of a smaller number of Democratic leaning voters who almost certainly intended to cast a vote in the Senate race but for some reason did not do so. Ultimately, the anticipated recount may clarify the relative proportions of intentional versus unintentional residual votes. At present, though, the data available suggest that the recount will uncover many of the former and that, of the latter, a majority will likely prove to be supportive of Franken.


Full Report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cool...... It's a wait and see. I'm so happy about Barack, i can wait.
Peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC