*ahem* Speaking of "restributing the wealth", is it time for that now?

[underpants]

[On the Road]

1. No -- Redistributing Assets is Not Required

and would involve some fifth amendment questions in any case.

Just going back to taxing income on a more progressive scale is enough to do the trick.

[arcadian]

2. Yeah, I wouldn't mind some wealth being redistributed my way.

I hear money is going to be thrown from helicopters.

[underpants]

5. A-ha!

so THAT'S what the Clinton's were testing out with the black helicopters back in the 90's

:fistbump:

[Sal Minella]

6. Are you a Wall Street Bank or an auto company CEO? If not, fergit it.

I'm actually thinking about e-mailing Hank that "I'm a bank, now, Hank -- I just decided, I'm a bank from now on" -- and see if he'll send me a billion or two. Can't hurt to try.

[readmoreoften]

3. Stop it with your War on Christmas. Christmas isn't about poor, inferior, icky people.

It's about expensive dye jobs, fancy clothes, parties, and the hottest video games.

[underpants]

4. This is redistribution WITHIN the same house!!!

or are we all in this together now?

[readmoreoften]

8. So it's only a "small" War on Christmas, huh commie? Huh? Huh?

Only a "redistribution" within your "family". More of your libral soshalist comunistic anti-family values that you teach your children. Hello?! My family gets its gifts from the Lord God Santa, not "redistribution of parental income" to our lazy unemployed children.

[Parche]

7. give me your $500 running shoes

:rofl: :rofl::rofl:

Run Forrest Run