Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well now. . .didn't Jesus have two daddies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:44 AM
Original message
Well now. . .didn't Jesus have two daddies?
just wonderin'. ....


I was reading on some discussion forum that one sign at the Prop H8 rallies said that...:-).

Maybe that should be the gay theme to handle the revisionist religionists. . .


JESUS HAD TWO DADDIES

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought he had 3...
The Big "G", The Holy Ghost and ol' Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. There being a Trinity, wouldn't he have had four Daddies?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peruban Donating Member (888 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Not exactly.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 11:02 AM by peruban
You're referring to the trinity (which is also known the 'godhead" by fundies.

The trinity is one solid body with separate entities making up the whole. God gives the word, the word is then carried by the holy spirit, and made known to Jesus, the word made flesh.

So there's the Word, the communicating force that binds them, and then the word made flesh.

I welcome any further questions you may have and look forward to helping some people learn more and have more respect for my faith and realize that there is an enlightenment moment occurring all around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. 3 ... don't forget Ghost Daddy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winnipegosis Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Or none at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know about Jesus
But David and Jonathan down in the OT had a intense love affair going on the way I (and certain biblical experts who actually know what they're talking about) read it.

Yup THAT David. The sling slinging Giant killer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. shhhh! the fundies hate it when you bring up studies of Aramaic showing they were intimate!
even the rewritten into English versions sure make it look like something was serious between the two - but the fundies freak out and say, they were just best friends... RIIIIIGHT.

That story helps give me strength spiritually. I believe the original story was a clear sexual and spiritual relationship between the two. It's a great story of love!

Many different Yes We Did items in the Obama/Biden section www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peruban Donating Member (888 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Why do I not understand anything you just posted?
Oh wait, you said David as in Michaelangelo's David? Can you please provide a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm lovin your logic!
And David was really hot. Lets see, then there were Paul and Timothy ..

Do I hear exploding heads .. hee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Paul's a creep...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Jesus had two daddies> Ya know, that must have been a very confusing upbringing.
I'm surprised that he wasn't taken away by the rabbinate, instead of being reared in that confusing environment. It just shouldn't have been allowed. Children should be reared in conventional marriages, Not one where figments are having their way with the mom. Strange that didn't lead to one man, one woman, one figment, slippery-slope marriages.

The fundy's really do need to look into this. Jesus may have had psychological issues from that kind of non-traditional home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peruban Donating Member (888 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Are you kidding?
First off, after doing the deed, God split and became a deadbeat dad - Joseph took him along with Mary and supported them as a carpenter. Unfortunately Jesus never mastered basic carpentry, so he founded his own religion and finally reconciled with his spiritual Father with the help of the holy spirit/ghost/whatever.

Sounds reasonable, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Who made your Jesus? God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with him.
Sojourner Truth as best I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. this is funnier than hell and I'm stealing it - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. Poor Gullible Mary.. We all know how young girls can be swept off their feet..
That sly Gabriel..what a smooth-talker he must have been..

"Hey Baby..I'm an angel.. & work with me..we're gonna both go to heaven...let me help you with those ties on your dress"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peruban Donating Member (888 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's pretty weak analogy.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 10:43 AM by peruban
I mean, here's God, performing the immaculate conception and then, like many fathers, he goes out for some beer and cigarettes and doesn't show back up until his son if a full grown man while living with Joseph and Mary. I doubt we would have been able to perform a paternity test even if the technology had been available. I'm guessing Mary's immaculate conception didn't require normal fertilization which kind of implies that God did it and Jesus would have been walking around with the same DNA as his mother, including the female X chromosome instead of the Y. Could Jesus have been a woman?

Damn I speculate too much.

updated heading on edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. Actually, there is a rational explanation for the "virgin birth"
I got this from a Discovery channel program called "The Riddle of the Dead Sea Scrolls"

In that day, 3 marriages were typical

First, the child was "given in marriage"
Second, at puberty, sex was explained and they were told to not do it until the final marriage
Third, final ceremony .... hot sex could begin. The marriage was "consecrated" with pregnancy

Now for the kicker....
A Jewish woman was considered a "virgin" until she had the Final wedding. A "virgin birth" was a whoopsie, and a derogatory term used to designate pre-marital sex. In today's lingo ... Jesus was a "bastard child"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peruban Donating Member (888 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. You certainly used the word properly.
Jesus was technically a bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Jesus is part of the trinity
not a separate entity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC