Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thomas Friedman, you have NO moral authority on this matter.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:28 PM
Original message
Thomas Friedman, you have NO moral authority on this matter.
Mr. Friedman, you pseudo-intellectual, you who passes for a "great mind" (says Tweety) in MSM "journalism" today.

You have no right, no right, sir, to pass judgment on anyone, including the Michigan Congressional Delegation, on the automobile crisis. Or point fingers at anyone on the current economic crisis and credit crunch that YOUR SUPPORT FOR THE IRAQ WAR CAUSED. We're in debt BECAUSE of the war. Credit is tight, frozen because of this debt and the IRAQ WAR which you whole-heartedly supported.

You neo-liberal flunky, you globalization toady. You water-carrier for the Bush Doctrine.

You, sir, have no moral authority on this or any other matter.

(End Keith Olberman-esque rant) about Tom Friedman on Meet the Press.

:rant:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know why anyone gives him any credit for anything
From the first time I heard him, he seemed like an obvious and unoriginal hack. Yet still he gets credit from people who should know a whole lot better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I don't know his whole body of work; but he's certainly coming across as a pompous hack right now!
A bit too big for his boots, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. He's completely pompous.
I haven't read all of his work, either. But I used to read his column in the New York Times, before he started waving the flag for the invasion of Iraq. After that I couldn't even read his columns- I'd just skip right over them.

The book that we were talking about- "The World is Flat" and the articles that accompanied the book are complete fluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. "corporate" media...
corporate part likes the policies Mr. Friedman cheerleads. That's why...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes they do.
They love the policies he touts.

And then they can also claim that they've had a "liberal" viewpoint represented on the show.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Ha!... I Know. I Also Know He ain't no Liberal
but he sure does fit the description that right wing AM radio and corporate America loves to paint us.

Someday the meat heads on the right may actually find that all their information, everything they thought they knew about the left was a corporate/GOP cartoon character to keep them from ever listening to our side.

People like Friedman play their part...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wasn't aware that Friedman had ever run anything but his mouth. Mr. CremePuff
merely has another book out. meh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. His books-
His books are another disturbing thing to me. I work in the academic realm (librarian) and what is so unbelievable is the number of professors who have their students reading "The World is Flat." What a piece of junk that book is. And yet so many swooned over it- suckered by its "cleverness."

I swear they're brainwashing students to be unquestioningly pro-globalization. I can't see any other explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I read that book and I seriously couldn't believe what passes as erudite prose,
logical conclusions and sound research. I thought it was terrible. An amateur collection of what seemed to be a cross between tarot cards and a farmers almanac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Totally.
Amateurish, weak arguments, illogical. Junk, just Junk.

I still can't believe it's required reading in so many college-level courses- Business classes, Political Science classes. Argh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I remember when it came out I didn't even understand the "Flat" part.
I was like...'didn't the human race spend like centuries debating the whole the earth is round bit and now to prove a point about competitive economic playing fields you want to claim the world is "flat". Half the time his arguments seemed to dispute each other and that did seem "flat".

Sure made out like a bandit for the intellectually challenged tho'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. As so many writers do.
He did make out like a bandit, that's for sure. As so many hack writers do. I don't mean to sound snobby about books- as long as people read, well, that's a good thing.

I just have a problem with his work being considered worthy of such undeserved praise and its widespread use in academia.

I'm hoping he's just a passing fad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It does seem to be a fad, this long litany of political books. Some have been good
and of course I read largely the liberal end of things. Woodward's books are another exercise in literary futility. Not to mention the false claims and the items he has conveniently left out of his books.

I've gone back to reading the tried and true. Current literature, films, and so called "fact" books all seem to have gone the way of TV with its "reality" shows. We laughingly refer to culture in the US as 'idiotocracy' at my house. And even that movie was not of the caliber of something Mel Brooks would have put together.

I am a book snob. I admit it. After 8 years of Bush, it may be the only thing I will have to be snobbish about. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. IMO most college Economics departments are noting but centers of Neo-Liberal indoctrination.
Edited on Sun Nov-16-08 02:39 PM by Odin2005
Students get the "protectionism is horrible" BS brainwashed into them from day one, and are constantly told that "protectionism" is nothing but politicians buying votes and similar BS, or at least that is why a friend of mine, who has a master's degree in economics and an unabashed old-school Keyensian, told me.

Neo-Liberalism is to the Right what Marxism is to the Left, a religion masquerading as something scientific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I think you're probably right.
I figured that this is what is happening, which is just really sad- what has happened to critical thinking? Exploring all sides of issues? Allowing students to form their own opinions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. for a while there I thought I was watching
"The Tom Friedman Show" :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sophree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I know, me too.
The way the MSM blows smoke up his ass is sickening. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's like the Anti-Bill Kristol
They're opposite sides of the same coin, and both always wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Tom Friedman is a lying, un-American, antipatriot POS
He's also a goddamned billionaire (by marriage). I guess he sees himself as part of the global elite, not an American. He's also a pompous windbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC