Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ejected at ’04 RNC Convention, a Protester Gets $55,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Ejected at ’04 RNC Convention, a Protester Gets $55,000
Ejected at ’04 Convention, a Protester Gets $55,000

By COLIN MOYNIHAN
Published: November 15, 2008


During President Bush’s acceptance speech in Madison Square Garden at the 2004 Republican National Convention, a San Francisco woman briefly interrupted the proceedings by standing on a chair and unfurling a banner that accused the president of lying.

That protest set into motion a chain of events that has ended in one of the more unusual legal resolutions connected to the four days of the convention, during which more than 1,800 demonstrators and bystanders were arrested, most of them in street protests. Hundreds of them subsequently sued the city, saying they had been arrested unlawfully or detained in holding cells without access to lawyers.

As of September, the city had paid about $1.5 million to settle 142 lawsuits arising out of the convention. The payout total rose by $55,000 on Friday, when the San Francisco woman, June Brashares, 44, an events planner, peace advocate and a member of the protest group Code Pink, reached a settlement in a lawsuit in which she said she had been injured while being ejected from the Garden and had been falsely prosecuted.

But unlike the other cases, which were settled after allegations of misconduct by city police officers or other city employees, the defendants in the Brashares case were not under the city’s control. They were two convention volunteers from California, a Republican group in California and the Republican National Committee.

Yet the city’s Law Department represented them anyway because of an indemnification agreement under which the city assumes the cost of defending any lawsuit arising from the 2004 convention that names the Republican National Committee.


more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/nyregion/16settle.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=nyregion&adxnnlx=1226811274-NHxxZrheE5KKjicTYVAa5Q&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a mess.
Starting with that headline.

WTF, NYT? The woman didn't sue to get money!

Damn.

And due to the GOP fucking with people's civil liberties, the city of New York will have to pay.

Damn, damn, damn.

I hope this makes it damn near impossible for a city to host their damn convention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So MY tax money is paying for the RNC's mistakes!! That sucks!!!
Why the hell did NYC sign something that stupid???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If I'm reading it correctly, yeah. Sorry.
I wonder if NYC residents can sue the RNC for their money back?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It wasn't the RNC that falsely arrested her; so far, the RNC still doesn't have arrest powers. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I was thinking the same thing--that Republicans have become too toxic for cities
to host their ugly convention charades.

But I don't object to the headline. I'm glad that a protester who called Bush a liar got $55,000. It's about time that these kinds of civil rights violations are stopped, and Pukes only understand MONEY. I'm sorry the city indemnified the Pukes, and it's the taxpayers, as usual, who bear the brunt of Puke crimes. But maybe it will make cities think twice about what they, or the people they indemnify, are doing. You don't arrest peaceful protesters. You don't shut people up, and abuse them, for exercising their rights under the Constitution. Those are the rules for indemnity, and, if you break them, YOU pay--or take your freak show elsewhere.

It cheered my heart--that $55,000! Kudos and laurel wreaths to Code Pink!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I just think the NYT could be a little more objective in their reporting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC