Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK, who is the one impersonating Ben Stein and what did he do with the real one?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 08:54 PM
Original message
OK, who is the one impersonating Ben Stein and what did he do with the real one?
On CBS "Sunday Morning" he actually spoke in favor of helping the car manufacturers. For the same reason that many of us cite: 3 million people out of a job would aggravate our fragile economy even more and for national security reasons. They built tanks in WWII. Who builds them these days/

I am still puzzled about how, exactly, those billions of dollars can help Detroit if no one is buying. If it is through car loans - isn't this what Paulson is having in mind, helping the consumers directly to secure loans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know what. The freepers were right. Obama is hynotizing EVERYONE!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrizzlyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. The bailout is to help them meet payroll, etc.
It does NOTHING in the way of helping them help themselves on the long term. And therein lies the problem. I'm all for helping, but I want some guarantee there is some long term plan to increase sales. If there is not, then I'm afraid a bailout is merely a band aid.

Our DU resident GM/UAW expert says we should all happily hand over our tax dollars to the same idiots that ran the companies into the ground and "keep our fucking mouths shut" because we are "anti worker" if we don't blindly hand over money. I disagree with that assessment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Just as last year, they striked
to assure job security and I wondered here how many of us can demand job security.

No one's job is secure these days, and this is how we have had it for almost 30 years now, when we shifted from manufacturing and farming the a service based economy.

So if we purchase only what we need, we send the whole global economy on a downward spirals. And to artificially keep one industry afloat will just postpone the final blow.

I know that we need this industry, I just don't know how a bailout is going to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. shouldn't they be building rail cars, instead?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Remember when the Nazi's reign ended
There were few Germans that would admit to supporting them afterwards in Germany.

Not saying Ben Stein is a Nazi (far from it), but the situation is similar with the once arrogant neocons after the failure of Bush.

I knew that this was going to happen as soon as one of the original members of the PNAC (Fukiyama ..sp?) did his 180 degree about face a couple of years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Stein has actually been making sense (on the economy) lately.
I've seen him on Larry King and read a column or two by him in which he basically admits that greedy Wall St. fuckers have ruined the system, and he even suggested a bottom-up bailout in which the gov't would pay people's mortgages, in turn helping the banks. He still thinks Bush is a "good guy" though. And he is also still a delusional creationist. But apparently he is not heartless.

I don't think the auto bailout will work long-term unless trade regulations are changed to make a fair playing field between domestic and foreign car makers. GM pays more overhead, and that should be reflected by a tariff on imports. Without that, they are still in the same boat, sinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good thing GM was here when we needed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC