Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU: FOIA DOCS-Show Feds Can Lojack Mobile Phones WITHOUT Telco Help

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:23 AM
Original message
ACLU: FOIA DOCS-Show Feds Can Lojack Mobile Phones WITHOUT Telco Help
FOIA docs show feds can lojack mobiles without telco help

By Julian Sanchez | Published: November 16, 2008 - 10:45PM CT

...................

This summer, however, the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation sued the Justice Department, seeking documents related to the FBI's cell-phone tracking practices. Since August, they've received a stream of documents—the most recent batch on November 6—that were posted on the Internet last week. In a post on the progressive blog Daily Kos, ACLU spokesperson Rachel Myers drew attention to language in several of those documents implying that triggerfish have broader application than previously believed.

As one of the documents intended to provide guidance for DOJ employees explains, triggerfish can be deployed "without the user knowing about it, and without involving the cell phone provider." That may be significant because the legal rulings requiring law enforcement to meet a high "probable cause" standard before acquiring cell location records have, thus far, pertained to requests for information from providers, pursuant to statutes such as the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) and the Stored Communications Act.

The Justice Department's electronic surveillance manual explicitly suggests that triggerfish may be used to avoid restrictions in statutes like CALEA that bar the use of pen register or trap-and-trace devices—which allow tracking of incoming and outgoing calls from a phone subject to much less stringent evidentiary standards—to gather location data. "By its very terms," according to the manual, "this prohibition applies only to information collected by a provider and not to information collected directly by law enforcement authorities. Thus, CALEA does not bar the use of pen/trap orders to authorize the use of cell phone tracking devices used to locate targeted cell phones."

Perhaps surprisingly, it's only with the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act in 2001 that the government has needed any kind of court order to use triggerfish. While previously, the statutory language governing pen register or trap-and-trace orders did not appear to cover location tracking technology. Under the updated definition, these explicitly include any "device or process which records or decodes dialing, routing, addressing, and signaling information."

much more (plus links) at:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081116-foia-docs-show-feds-can-lojack-mobiles-without-telco-help.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. we pay for our own bugs
I have no doubt that the Feds can not only locate a cell phone at will, but also turn-on the mic. and/or camera at will. No telco help necessary: those back-doors were installed long ago now.

I find it ironic that we Americans (yes, me included) actually pay $50 or more per month for the devices that allow for total and constant surveillance.

K&R

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We don't have any choice
I bought a new phone recently. I wanted one without a camera, and was told flat-out that it was not possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That Depends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. tape over the camera
or take the battery out when it is not in use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. A Tin-Foil moment
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 11:48 AM by formercia
Aluminum foil, actually. Turn your phone off and wrap it in foil so that it can't be queried.

By a trac-phone or similar and pay in cash. Better yet, get someone else to buy it for you. When the minutes run out, smash it. Get another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. i smell an entrepreneurial opportunity
a tinfoil phone case. write to the people who make the otter boxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Faraday Cage
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 12:53 PM by formercia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage

Keep your signal from getting away. This angle could be worked many ways. Put a conductive strap on it and hang it around your neck.

In a pinch, you can put it in a condom and stuff it in a body cavity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phusion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. here you go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Conspiracy deniers in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC