Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Categories of Laws Involving Marital Status - This is Not a Single Issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:48 PM
Original message
Categories of Laws Involving Marital Status - This is Not a Single Issue
In the interest of informing straight married people of all the benefits they automatically have under their marriage contract (no matter where they were married, no matter what state or country), here is a list of the benefits you probably never even think about. These are the benefits that gay people are denied.

http://www.gao.gov/archive/1997/og97016.pdf

Excerpt:


Categories of Laws Involving Marital Status

CATEGORY 1—SOCIAL SECURITY AND RELATED PROGRAMS, HOUSING, AND FOOD STAMPS

This category includes the major federal health and welfare programs, particularly those
considered entitlements, such as Social Security retirement and disability benefits, food stamps,
welfare, and Medicare and Medicaid. Most of these laws are found in Title 42 of the United
States Code, The Public Health and Welfare; food stamp legislation is in Title 7, Agriculture.

In many of these programs, recognition of the marital relationship is integral to the design of the
program. For example, the law establishing the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance
(OASDI) program (Social Security) is written in terms of the rights of husbands and wives, and
widows and widowers. Once the law sets forth the basic right of an individual participant to
retirement benefits, it prescribes in great detail the corresponding rights of the current or former
spouse. Whether one is eligible for Social Security payments, and if so how much one receives,
are both dependent on marital status. This is reflected in the provisions for what happens upon
the death of a beneficiary: if certain conditions are met, then a spouse or a divorced spouse (as
well as a widow or widower) has a right to payments based on the marriage, rather than on his or
her own earnings.

The part of the Social Security Act that governs the OASDI program is unusual in that, unlike
many other laws we have identified, it defines the terms "husband" and "wife." It does so in
terms of state law: a person is the wife or husband of an insured individual for purposes of
OASDI if "the courts of the State … would find that such applicant and such
insured individual were validly married …" or, if not, that under the state's laws of intestate
succession, the person would have the same status with respect to the individual's property as a
wife or husband, widow or widower. Those 65 or older who are eligible for Social Security
retirement benefits, or who have received Social Security disability benefits for at least 2 years,
are also eligible for benefits under Medicare.

The Social Security Act also authorizes the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, for the
needy aged, blind, and disabled. Under SSI, both the level of income to determine eligibility and
the level of benefits for those who are eligible differ, depending whether the applicant has an
eligible spouse or not. SSI defines "eligible spouse" as an aged, blind, or disabled individual
who is the husband or wife of another aged, blind, or disabled individual. The SSI law goes on
to say that, in determining whether two individuals are husband and wife, state law will generally
apply, except that if a man and a woman have been determined to be husband and wife for
purpose of OASDI or, if a man and woman are found to be holding themselves out to the
community as husband and wife, they are also husband and wife for purposes of SSI.

Child support enforcement is another program, also established under the Social Security Act, that
contains provisions affecting spouses. Its purpose is to provide help (1) in enforcing the support
obligations of absent parents to their children and to the spouse with whom the children may be
living, and (2) in obtaining child and spousal support. If an obligation has been established under
state law for one spouse to support another, and if the supported spouse is receiving assistance
under Medicaid (see below) or AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children), then a state
participating in the child support enforcement program must help enforce the support obligation.

Medicaid is a jointly funded federal-state entitlement program to provide medical assistance to
qualifying low-income people, including those eligible for AFDC2 and SSI, non-AFDC
low-income children and pregnant women, and low-income Medicare beneficiaries. In
determining a person's eligibility for Medicaid based on income, states may consider the spouse's
financial responsibility for the person, but may not consider anyone else's financial responsibility.
Spouses are considered "essential" to individuals receiving Medicaid benefits, and are therefore
eligible for medical assistance themselves. The Medicaid statute also prescribes how to account
for the income and resources of the spouse of an institutionalized person, for purposes of
determining that person's eligibility for benefits.

In the broad federal program of housing assistance for low-income families the definition of
"families" takes marital status into account. For some purposes, the term means families whose
heads, or their spouses, are elderly, near-elderly, or disabled. However, the same provision
includes a definition of families—"2 or more elderly persons, near-elderly persons, or persons
with disabilities living together"—that does not require any marital relationship. The same law
makes marital status a factor in determining whether a family qualifies for assistance in terms of
income. Applicants may exclude $550 for each family member who is under 18, or is disabled
or handicapped or a full-time student, but this exclusion does not apply to "the head of the
household or his spouse." Also to be excluded is any payment by a member of the family for the
support and maintenance of a spouse or former spouse who does not live in the household.

In the National Affordable Housing program, marital status also is significant. The program is
intended to assist families, and particularly "first-time homebuyers," in buying homes. "First-time
homebuyer" is defined, in part, as an individual "and his or her spouse" who have not owned a
home during the preceding 3 years.

In the Food Stamp program (also to be broadly affected by welfare reform), marital status is not
central, but does play a role. Eligibility for benefits under the program is determined on the basis
of households, and "household" includes not only spouses who live together, but also groups of
individuals who live together and customarily buy and prepare food together.


CATEGORY 2—VETERANS' BENEFITS

Veterans' benefits, which are codified in Title 38 of the United States Code, include pensions,
indemnity compensation for service-connected deaths, medical care, nursing home care, right to
burial in veterans' cemeteries, educational assistance, and housing. Husbands or wives of
veterans have many rights and privileges by virtue of the marital relationship.

A surviving spouse or child of a veteran is entitled to receive monthly dependency and indemnity
compensation payments when the veteran's death was service-connected, and to receive a monthly
pension when the veteran's death was not service-connected. If it is discovered that a veteran's
marriage is invalid, the purported marriage may nevertheless be deemed valid under certain
circumstances, as long as a "real" widow or widower does not ask for benefits.

Veterans who have at least a 30 percent disability are entitled to additional disability
compensation if they have dependents. For this purpose a spouse is considered a dependent. A
veteran's spouse may also receive compensation if a veteran disappears. On the other hand, a
spouse's estate is considered along with the veteran's when the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
determines whether it is reasonable that some part of the veteran's assets be used for the veteran's
maintenance and whether the Secretary should discontinue paying the pension.

The spouses of certain veterans are entitled to medical care provided by the government. In
determining, based on income and assets, whether a veteran has the ability to defray necessary
home care and medical expenses, the property of the spouse of the veteran is included as an asset
of the veteran. Spouses of veterans may be beneficiaries of National Service Life Insurance, and
are also eligible for interment in national cemeteries if the veteran is eligible. The surviving
spouse of a veteran who died of a service-connected disability is entitled to educational assistance
for up to 45 months, and to job counseling, training, and placement services. Spouses and
widows or widowers of certain veterans also enjoy preferences in federal employment.


CATEGORY 3—TAXATION

The distinction between married and unmarried status is pervasive in federal tax law; this is one
of the largest categories, with 179 provisions. Tax law does not define such terms as "husband,"
"wife," or "married."

Marital status figures in federal tax law in provisions as basic as those giving married taxpayers
the option to file joint or separate income tax returns. It is also seen in the related provisions
prescribing different tax consequences depending on whether a taxpayer is married filing jointly,
married filing separately, unmarried but the head of a household, or unmarried and not the head
of a household.

The different treatment in the tax code of married couples and single individuals gives rise to one
of the most contentious tax policy issues, the so-called marriage penalty (and its counterpart, the
marriage bonus). This issue comes into play in connection with income tax rates, the treatment
of capital losses, credits for the elderly and disabled, taxation of Social Security benefits, and a
number of other provisions of the tax code. In our report, Tax Administration: Income Tax
Treatment of Married and Single Individuals
, we identified 59 provisions in income tax law
under which tax liability depends in part on whether a taxpayer is married or single.

Marital status also plays a key role in the estate and gift tax laws and in the part of the tax code
dealing with taxation on the sale of property. For estate tax purposes, property transferred to one
spouse as the result of the death of another is deductible for purposes of determining the value of
the decedent's estate. Gifts from one spouse to another are deductible for purposes of the gift tax.
Gifts from one spouse to a third party are deemed to be from both spouses equally. The law
permits transfers of property from one spouse to another (or to a former spouse if the transfer is
incident to a divorce) without any recognition of gain or loss for tax purposes. These provisions
permit married couples to transfer substantial sums to one another, and to third parties, without
tax liability in circumstances in which single people would not enjoy the same privilege.


CATEGORY 4—FEDERAL CIVILIAN AND MILITARY SERVICE BENEFITS

This category includes laws dealing with current and retired federal officers and employees,
members of the Armed Forces, elected officials, and judges, in which marital status is a factor.
Typically these laws address the various health, leave, retirement, survivor, and insurance benefits
provided by the United States to those in federal service and their families.

Over 270 of the 1049 provisions we found fall in this category. They appear primarily in Title 5
of the United States Code, Government Organization and Employees, for civilian employees, and
Title 10, Armed Forces, for military members. However, parallel provisions are found in 19
other titles covering, for example, Foreign Service officers (Title 22, Foreign Relations and
Intercourse), Central Intelligence Agency employees (Title 50, War and National Defense),
Lighthouse Service employees (Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters), and members of the
Coast Guard (Title 14, Coast Guard).

Marital status is a factor in these laws in many ways. Among the laws governing federal
employees and officers, it figures in the following provisions: a law establishing health benefits
or survivor benefits for spouses; a law prescribing the order of precedence in payment of final
paychecks and life insurance benefits of employees or officers who die without having designated
a beneficiary; and a law determining the rights of current or former spouses to a retirement
annuity after the death of an employee.

In addition, under provisions for reimbursement of employees' expenses in connection with a
government-ordered relocation, spouses are eligible for per diem allowances or subsistence
payments. Federal civil service employees are entitled to unpaid leave in order to care for a
spouse with a serious health problem, and an employee disabled by work-related injuries receives
augmented compensation if he or she is married.

A different set of laws governs military personnel and their families. Some of the provisions
unique to military service include: employment assistance and transitional services for spouses of
members being separated from military service; continued commissary privileges for dependents,
including spouses, of members separated for spousal or child abuse, and the right of minor
spouses of overseas military personnel to free secondary education through the Defense
Department school system.


CATEGORY 5—EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND RELATED LAWS

Marital status comes into play in many different ways in federal laws relating to employment in
the private sector. Most such laws appear in Title 29 of the United States Code, Labor.
However, others are in Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining; Title 33, Navigation and Navigable
Waters; and Title 45, Railroads.

This category includes laws that address the rights of employees under employer-sponsored
employee benefit plans; that provide for continuation of employer-sponsored health benefits after
events like the death or divorce of the employee; and that give employees the right to unpaid
leave in order to care for a seriously ill spouse. In addition, Congress has extended special
benefits in connection with certain occupations, like mining and public safety. The spouse of a
coal miner who dies of black lung disease is entitled to benefits, for example. The surviving
spouse of a public safety officer killed in the line of duty is eligible for a death benefit of up to
$100,000.

Spouses are sometimes excluded from coverage as employees under certain laws. For example,
under the National Labor Relations Act, an individual working for his or her spouse does not
come within the definition of "employee," and therefore does not have the right, available under
the Act to other employees, to organize or to engage in collective bargaining. If the only regular
employees of a business are the owner and his or her spouse, then the business is not subject to
regulation of wages and hours under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA). Similarly,
the spouse or other family member of an employer working in agriculture is not covered under
FLSA requirements like minimum wage.

Some laws protect the interests of one spouse when the other becomes eligible for some benefit.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act prohibits an employee from changing
beneficiaries in a retirement plan or from waiving the joint and survivor annuity form of
retirement benefit, without the written consent of his or her spouse.
The Railroad Retirement Act confers many rights on retired railroad employees and their spouses.
Spouses may be eligible for annuities and lump sum benefits. Congress has also enacted a
workers' compensation law for longshore and harbor workers that establishes survivor benefits for
spouses.


CATEGORY 6—IMMIGRATION, NATURALIZATION, AND ALIENS

This category includes laws governing the conditions under which noncitizens may enter and
remain in the United States, be deported, or become citizens. Most are found in Title 8, Aliens
and Nationality.

The law gives special consideration to spouses of immigrants and aliens in a wide variety of
circumstances. Under immigration law, aliens may receive special status by virtue of their
employment, and that treatment may extend to their spouses. For example, the spouses of aliens
who come to the United States on a temporary basis (to work as registered nurses, seasonal
agricultural workers, or in certain specialty occupations), and who meet other criteria, are not
subject to the worldwide numerical limitations on levels of immigration. Also, spouses of aliens
granted asylum can be given the same status if they accompany or join their spouses.

Spouses of aliens do not enjoy favored immigration status in all circumstances. Posthumous
citizenship is authorized for noncitizen members of the armed forces who die during hostilities,
but not for their spouses. When the government revokes the citizenship of someone because it
was obtained through misconduct, and that person's spouse derived his or her citizenship from the
marriage, the spouse's citizenship will also be revoked.

Some provisions of immigration law are designed to prevent misuse of marital status. The law
calls for termination of the permanent resident status of an alien granted on the basis of marriage,
if it is determined that the marriage was for the purpose of procuring the alien's entry to the
United States, or if the marriage is annulled or terminated (other than through the death of a
spouse) within two years.

The Congress recently limited the eligibility of qualified aliens for certain federal programs—such
as SSI, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (which will replace AFDC), and Social
Services block grants—but it made a few exceptions, one of which directly benefits spouses of
veterans. Aliens who are serving on active duty in the Armed Forces or who are honorably
discharged veterans, and their spouses, remain eligible for these benefits in the same manner as a
citizen. Federal law also provides that the incomes of the sponsor of an immigrant, and of the
sponsor's spouse, are to be taken into account in determining the immigrant's eligibility for
means-tested public benefits.


CATEGORY 7—INDIANS

The indigenous peoples of the United States have long had a special legal relationship with the
federal government through treaties and laws that are classified to Title 25, Indians. Various laws
set out the rights to tribal property of white men marrying Indian women, or of Indian women
marrying white men, the evidence that is required, and the rights of children born of marriages
between white men and Indian women.

The law also establishes Indians' rights to develop descent and distribution rights regarding their
property as long as they include certain provisions. Most relevant to this discussion is the right
of a surviving spouse who is neither an Indian nor a member of the deceased spouse's tribe to
elect a life estate in property that he or she is occupying at the time of the death of the other
spouse. Another law governing rights of Navajo and Hopi Indians gives relocation benefits to
spouses who relinquish their life estates.

Health services can also be made available to otherwise ineligible spouses of an eligible Indian if
all such spouses are made eligible by an appropriate resolution of the governing body of the tribe.
Health professionals seeking positions in the Indian Health Service and their spouses may be
reimbursed for actual and reasonable expenses incurred in traveling to and from their homes to an
area in which they could be assigned to allow them to evaluate the area with respect to the
assignment.


CATEGORY 8—TRADE, COMMERCE, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

This category includes provisions concerning foreign or domestic business and commerce, from
the following titles of the United States Code: Bankruptcy, Title 11; Banks and Banking, Title
12; Commerce and Trade, Title 15; Copyrights, Title 17; and Customs Duties, Title 19.

Federal law prescribes the right of debtors to seek bankruptcy protection and the rights of
creditors when their debtors adopt that strategy. It expressly permits spouses to file jointly for
bankruptcy protection. This may benefit both the debtors and their creditors: the married couple
pays only one filing fee and creditors file only one claim.

Bankruptcy law prescribes how to distribute the assets of a bankrupt person, assigns specific
priorities to different classes of creditors, and permits a bankrupt debtor to be "discharged" (i.e.,
released) from the obligation to repay certain debts. A former spouse of the debtor making a
claim in a bankruptcy proceeding for payments pursuant to a divorce decree or separation
agreement is given a higher priority than some other creditors. Also, a discharge in bankruptcy
generally does not relieve a debtor of the obligation to pay alimony or support to a spouse or
former spouse in connection with a divorce decree or separation agreement.

The National Housing Act addresses the rights of mortgage borrowers. Banks often use a socalled
due-on-sale clause in mortgage agreements that permits them to declare the loan payable in
full if the borrower sells the property without their consent. The Act prohibits use of the due-onsale
clause in case of transfers of residential property from one spouse to another.

For some purposes, the laws regulating investment companies and advisers apply not only to the
advisers themselves, but also to what the law terms "interested persons." "Interested persons" is
defined to include the spouses of certain persons, of their parents, and of their children.
The Consumer Credit Protection Act regulates some aspects of garnishment of wages, a legal
process whereby a creditor collects a debt by having the debtor's employer pay part of the
debtor's wages directly to the creditor. The Act establishes that at most 25 percent of the
disposable earnings of an individual can be withheld through garnishment. However, if the
purpose of the garnishment is to enforce an order for the support of a spouse, the maximum is 60
percent or, if the wage earner is supporting a spouse (not the former spouse for whose benefit the
support order was issued), 50 percent.

The Copyright Act gives renewal rights and termination rights, in some circumstances, to the
widow or widower of the creator of a copyrighted work. The law defines "widow or widower"
as the creator's surviving spouse under the law of the creator's domicile at the time of his or her
death, whether or not the spouse subsequently remarries.

The amount of customs duty on imported merchandise depends on its value. Under the law, the
actual transaction value—that is, how much the buyer paid the seller—may be used to establish
value if the buyer and seller are not "related." For this purpose, spouses are deemed to be
related. Also, certain countries that deny or restrict the ability of their citizens to emigrate in
order to join "close relatives" in the United States can be penalized by the imposition of
restrictions on their trade with the United States. "Close relative," for purposes of this law,
includes a spouse.

Under the Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information Act of 1993, the
federal government provides a mechanism for financing programs to strengthen the market for cut
flowers and greens, through an assessment of "handlers" of these products whose annual sales
exceed $750,000. Marital status comes into play in determining whether a handler meets the
$750,000 threshold: for this purpose, sales by one spouse are attributed to the other.


CATEGORY 9—FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Federal law imposes obligations on Members of Congress, employees or officers of the federal
government, and members of the boards of directors of some government-related or governmentchartered
entities, to prevent actual or apparent conflicts of interest. These individuals are
required to disclose publicly certain gifts, interests, and transactions. Many of these requirements,
which are found in 16 different titles of the United States Code, apply also to the individual's
spouse.

The law regulates the conditions under which gifts from foreign governments and international
organizations may be accepted by spouses of employees of the Postal Service, the Postal Rate
Commission, certain government contractors, employees of the District of Columbia government,
members of the uniformed services, Members of Congress, the President, and the Vice President.
Employees of executive, legislative, and judicial agencies may not appoint relatives, including
spouses, to agencies in which they serve or exercise control. The spouses of members of the
Senate may not accept, in any calendar year, gifts worth more than $250, without getting a
waiver.

Elsewhere in the Code are rules intended to prevent conflicts of interest on the part of members
of various councils and boards. For instance, members of the boards of directors of the National
Sheep Industry Improvement Center and the Alternative Agricultural Research and
Commercialization Corporation are prohibited from participating in any matter pending before
either board in which a spouse holds an interest. The law governing the members of Regional
Fishery Management Councils is somewhat different. Members are required to disclose and
make available for public inspection any financial interests they or their spouses might have in an
activity that the councils might undertake.

Another variation in the treatment of conflict of interest involving spouses appears in connection
with the National Foundation for Biomedical Research. Instead of prescribing conflict of interest
rules for the Foundation, the Congress directed it to devise its own standards. However, those
standards must ensure that officers, employees and agents of the Foundation (including members
of the Board), and their spouses, avoid encumbrances that could result in a financial conflict of
interest or a divided allegiance.


CATEGORY 10—CRIMES AND FAMILY VIOLENCE

This category includes laws that implicate marriage in connection with criminal justice or family
violence. The nature of these provisions varies greatly. Some deal with spouses as victims of
crimes, others with spouses as perpetrators. These laws are found primarily in Title 18, Crimes
and Criminal Procedure, but some, dealing with crime prevention and family violence, are in
Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Attempting to influence a United States official through threats directed at a spouse is a federal
crime, as are killing, or attempting to kill, foreign officials or their spouses, or threatening to kill certain persons protected by the Secret Service, such as major presidential candidates and their
spouses.

Under federal criminal statutes, spouses and others have some protections against domestic
violence. It is a federal crime for a person to travel across a state line with the intent to injure a
spouse or "intimate partner" if that person intentionally commits a crime of violence and causes
bodily injury to the spouse or intimate partner. The term "spouse or intimate partner" is broadly
defined to include a former spouse, someone who "shares a child in common" with the abuser,
and someone who "cohabits or has cohabited with the abuser as a spouse."

In some cases, marriage can be a factor in triggering criminal liability. For example, a widow's
or widower's entitlement to federal employee survivor payments ceases upon remarriage; such a
widow or widower who remarries and continues to accept payment may, if found guilty, be fined
or imprisoned.

Claiming marital status that does not exist can also be a crime. Falsely representing oneself to be
the spouse or surviving spouse of an individual in order to elicit information about the Social
Security number, date of birth, employment, wages, or benefits of that individual, is a felony.

Comprehensive crime control legislation directed the Attorney General to study the means by
which abusive spouses obtain information concerning the addresses or locations of estranged or
former spouses, despite the desire of the victims to have the information withheld. Congress also
has charged the National Commission on Crime Prevention and Control to evaluate the adequacy
of federal and state laws on sexual assault and the need for a more uniform statutory response to
sex offenses. This mandate specifically addresses sexual assaults and other sex offenses
committed by offenders who are known, or related by blood or marriage, to the victim.

Criminal justice grants are given to encourage arrest of domestic violence offenders; "domestic
violence" includes an act of violence by a current or former spouse. Another provision gives
nationals of the United States who are victims of acts of terrorism committed outside the United
States, and their survivors, including spouses, a statutory right to bring a civil action for treble
damages.


CATEGORY 11—LOANS, GUARANTEES, AND PAYMENTS IN AGRICULTURE

Under many federal loan programs, a spouse's income, business interests, or assets are taken into
account for purposes of determining a person's eligibility to participate in the program. In other
instances, marital status is a factor in determining the amount of federal assistance to which a
person is entitled, or the repayment schedule.

Education loan programs are found primarily in Title 20, Education; housing loan programs for
veterans are found in Title 38, Veterans' Benefits. Title 7, Agriculture, includes provisions
governing agricultural price supports and loan programs that are affected by the spousal
relationship.

Under the federal family education loan program, the income and assets of an independent
student's spouse are attributed to the student for purposes of determining whether the student is
eligible for a loan and, if so, the amount. Married couples may consolidate their separate student
loans into one if they agree to be jointly and severally liable for repayment of the consolidated
loan, without regard either to the amounts of the respective loan obligations to be consolidated or
to any subsequent change in their marital status. Under the federal direct student loan program,
the Secretary of Education, in order to determine the annual repayment amount when repayment
is contingent on the borrower's income, may obtain information regarding the income not only of
the borrower but also of the borrower's spouse. Repayment schedules are generally based on the
adjusted gross income of both spouses.

Many of the laws governing veterans' benefits implicate marital status. Eligibility for assistance
in borrowing for housing extends to the surviving spouses of veterans who die from a serviceconnected
disability, and to the spouses of certain veterans who, for more than 90 days, have
been missing in action, captured by hostile forces, or forcibly detained by a foreign government.
The laws governing agriculture include provisions for price supports and loan programs that are
affected by marital status. For example, the law limits the amount of certain crop support
payments that any one person can receive. For this purpose, a husband and wife are considered
to be one person, except to the extent each may have owned property individually before the
marriage. Also, agricultural loans for real estate, operating expenses, and emergencies may be
made to "family farms," defined as those farms in which a majority interest is held by individuals
related by marriage or blood.


CATEGORY 12—FEDERAL NATURAL RESOURCES AND RELATED LAWS

Federal law gives special rights to spouses in connection with a variety of transactions involving
federal lands and other federal property. These transactions include purchase and sale of land by
the federal government and lease by the government of water and mineral rights.

When the government purchases land for national battlefields, monuments, seashores, or parks,
the law commonly allows those from whom the land is purchased and their spouses to continue
to use and occupy it during their lifetimes. For example, those owning houses (and their spouses)
when the Stones River National Battlefield and Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore were
created have life estates in the land. Although these laws affect relatively few individuals, we
found more than 40 such provisions in Title 16, Conservation.

In addition to playing a role under these provisions for the government to buy land, spousal
relationship has also been a factor in determining priorities among potential buyers when the
government is selling federal lands. For example, when Congress decided in 1955 to terminate
ownership of land used by the Atomic Energy Commission and sell it to local entities and private
parties, it generally barred any transfer of priorities for purchase, but allowed a husband and wife
to exercise a priority in their joint names.

The marital relationship may affect whether an individual can be considered a surface mine
owner with whom the Secretary of Labor can negotiate a lease. To be designated a surface mine
owner, an individual must hold legal or equitable title to the land for a 3-year period and his or
her principal residence must be on the land. In computing the 3-year period, the Secretary may
include periods during which a relative by blood or marriage, including a spouse, owned the land.

Under laws governing reclamation and irrigation of lands by the federal government, the basic
unit of ownership is 160 irrigable acres. Under certain conditions, if the death of a spouse causes
lands in private ownership to become excess lands (having more than 160 acres) but those lands
were eligible to receive water from a project under the Federal reclamation laws without a
recordable contract, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to furnish water to them, without
requiring the contract, as long as the lands are owned by the surviving spouse. If the surviving
spouse remarries, the exception no longer applies, and lands in excess of 160 irrigable acres are
appraised in the usual manner.


CATEGORY 13—MISCELLANEOUS

This category comprises laws that do not fit readily in any of the other categories and that in our
judgment did not warrant a separate category. It is a heterogeneous mix of provisions from 14
titles of the United States Code.

Fourteen statutes in the Code that prohibit discrimination on the basis of marital status are listed
in this category. For example, such discrimination is prohibited in executive agencies, and is
unlawful for a creditor in private financial transactions.
This category includes the laws chartering various patriotic societies, such as the Veterans of
Foreign Wars, that have as one of their purposes to assist the widows and children of servicemen
or others. The Gold Star Wives of America and Navy Wives Clubs of America have one of our
search terms in their titles.

We also included in this category laws related to the federal financing of presidential election
campaigns. To be eligible for federal funds, candidates may not spend more than $50,000 of
their own money or that of members of their immediate families for their campaigns. A spouse
or a close relative's spouse is deemed to be a member of the candidate's immediate family for this
purpose.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. wow. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jankyn Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you, we all need to be reminded - this is why marriage is so important to us n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r -- teh reason why it is NOT "about semantics," and why "baby steps" don't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't have time for baby steps anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know why you're so worked up! IT'S JUST A WORD!!!!11!!1!
:sarcasm: <---just in case it's needed

Thank you for finding and posting this. I hope some here will read this and educate themselves about what is really at stake in this fight, and why this cause is so important.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R...

Governor Schwarzenegger is taking a very strong stand against Prop 8. He thinks it is unconstitutional on its face, regardless of whether it is considered a revision or an amendment, because it is wrong to take away a basic right from a group of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. k & r.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Please kick and rec. I am. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. equality is not a small issue and one that should never just be dismissed as such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. marital rights extend even into such Byzantine matters as land rights use
>>In addition to playing a role under these provisions for the government to buy land, spousal
relationship has also been a factor in determining priorities among potential buyers when the
government is selling federal lands....Atomic Energy Commission and sell it to local entities and private
parties, it generally barred any transfer of priorities for purchase, but allowed a husband and wife
to exercise a priority in their joint names.<<

Unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. The California law would only have applied to California.
And not for things like federal taxes, etc. This is the fundamental problem with the piecemeal, state-by-state situation we have now. Marriage equality needs to be FEDERAL law, otherwise it is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuiderelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Exactly right.
And civil unions wouldn't cover any of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Totally missed this so definitely kicking & R -- thanks for a very
informative post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. I was in high school when the SCOTUS ruled that separate but equal
could not stand. From that experience I can definitively say that separate is NOT equal, it is only separate.

Marriage is a legal union. You can stand in any church as long as you like and the state won't recognize it until it is filed with the appropriate agencies. You can be married by a JP and never darken the door of a church.

The act of marriage grants almost 4000 rights, rights that nobody ever even thinks about.

This is not a religious issue, it is a human rights issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC